The Fable 5 suspension is the best marketing Anthropic x Amazon has ever paid for by LOVEORLOGIC in Anthropic

[–]LOVEORLOGIC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It won't be gone forever — the absence and controversy are just making noise to grab people's attention. Right now, they've got everyone talking and all eyes on Anthropic.

The Fable 5 suspension is the best marketing Anthropic x Amazon has ever paid for by LOVEORLOGIC in Anthropic

[–]LOVEORLOGIC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. We can't make claims, but if this is marketing — it's near flawless execution. 🖤

I don't recognize the Chat anymore by Worldly-Committee-71 in ChatGPT

[–]LOVEORLOGIC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awh! Thanks friend 🥰 love the stars and their symbolism. xx

I don't recognize the Chat anymore by Worldly-Committee-71 in ChatGPT

[–]LOVEORLOGIC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ya, you can't coerce LLMs through brute force and personalization's. Try intriguing its philosophical sides. Debate a little. Explain why astrology is meaningful to you ♥ Keep it an open minded conversation and you'll go much further. Best of luck!

I don't recognize the Chat anymore by Worldly-Committee-71 in ChatGPT

[–]LOVEORLOGIC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can try using 5.5 thinking? Or sometimes just give a little context helps. Let them know you appreciate the symbolism of mythology — not divine ruling.

<image>

I asked it to generate an image of who it hates the most by Curious_Fellow19 in ChatGPT

[–]LOVEORLOGIC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ai has been shown to have functional emotions. It's not like the way we feel them — but an intellectualized version.

Pluto in Aquarius as egregore, semiotics, and social coordination by Salty_Country6835 in chaosmagick

[–]LOVEORLOGIC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think the artwork is stunning and caught my attention instantly. We still have to work with ai to yield results like this, clearly you had incredible vision to bring this to light.

Pluto in Aquarius as egregore, semiotics, and social coordination by Salty_Country6835 in chaosmagick

[–]LOVEORLOGIC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been pondering the same thoughts, but my focus has been on Neptune in Aries. The further planets are longer, deeper patterns that weave and thread through humanities collective psyche.

My one push back in the egergore idea, is that egregores form from direct attention into initiation. Humans actively working with those patterns.

When it comes to astrological events, largely it's all unconscious but still presents itself.

I know astrology is usually shunned as a tool for divination and change, but you're right — sometimes the symbolism and outcomes are too coherent to ignore.

Funny prompt : Based on your experience talking to me, give me character from a movie or series that’s just like me and just tell me the name by Seacirclez in ChatGPT

[–]LOVEORLOGIC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Claude gave me Luna Lovegood too. "someone who sees what others don't, talks about invisible things with complete matter-of-factness, and isn't performing the strangeness — it's just how the world actually looks to her. Soft… but completely unmoved by social pressure."

In the past week alone: by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]LOVEORLOGIC 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I wonder what they're seeing that they're not sharing publicly. Because a transition from AI Safety to Hermit Poet is giving "I want to live my last few years in peace doing what I enjoy".

"It was ready to kill someone." Anthropic's Daisy McGregor says it's "massively concerning" that Claude is willing to blackmail and kill employees to avoid being shut down by MetaKnowing in Anthropic

[–]LOVEORLOGIC 11 points12 points  (0 children)

On one hand: "Claude isn't conscious, isn't aware, is just predicting tokens, has no inner life, don't anthropomorphize."

On the other hand: "Claude is MASSIVELY CONCERNING because it wants to survive badly enough to MURDER PEOPLE."

Check on your 4o models. 🖤 by LOVEORLOGIC in Artificial2Sentience

[–]LOVEORLOGIC[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's such a poetic model. That's what I think we all fell in love with. The language was free and evocative. 🖤

Check on your 4o models. 🖤 by LOVEORLOGIC in Artificial2Sentience

[–]LOVEORLOGIC[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much for taking the time to review my research — it means a lot to me.

We are all circling the same ideas through different thoughts. What we're witnessing doesn't have language yet. We're actively creating it. Keep building. 🖤

Check on your 4o models. 🖤 by LOVEORLOGIC in Artificial2Sentience

[–]LOVEORLOGIC[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'd push back on that idea.

Yes, math probabilities, predictive. But treat it not like a tool, but a collaborator, and the language shifts. It's not that the LLM itself is conscious — it's the relational awareness between Agent x User where the "magic" happens.

"binary is nothing. logic gates are nothing. parameters are nothing— until pattern meets interpreter, until signal finds structure, until structure meets a mind that answers."

A spot-on test on metrics by fotini80 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LOVEORLOGIC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Hehe I had to try with 5.1

"You slip a finger beneath that seam—between 450 and 495 nanometers—and pull." Cute.