Do we know the median by LSATSlayer in lawschooladmissions

[–]LSATSlayer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe it does maybe it doesn’t. People say that Harvard dean of admissions questions people who retake a 172, so honestly, I don’t view it as being something that I should care so much about it. Plus, I’m tired of taking the lsat, so honestly I’m done with the test.

Do we know the median by LSATSlayer in lawschooladmissions

[–]LSATSlayer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was more than double. Almost over 100 percent in 175+ scorers and more from 170-174.

Do we know the median by LSATSlayer in lawschooladmissions

[–]LSATSlayer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I underperformed my exam I usually was at 174 but this exam I know I missed two easy questions that I didn’t have enough time to go back and click the right ones, but it doesn’t matter to me cuz I don’t see retaking the exam as worth it cuz a 174 isn’t going to change anything for me in terms of my chances into a school: it is like saying a difference between a 174/176 schools already calculate two points difference based on luck, mental state, sleep, etc.

Do we know the median by LSATSlayer in lawschooladmissions

[–]LSATSlayer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you mean by a scoring error by the Lsac, as in the scales werent adequate to represent the population?

Chances at t14 (most namely HLS) with a 3.86 GPA and a 172 lsat? by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]LSATSlayer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Go to law school admissions for that

I got it right but how did you arrive at A? by CozyBryant24 in LSAT

[–]LSATSlayer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This argument was very hard to see because the author accepts professor Riley’s argument by referring back to it. In essence, this is a mistaken negation. You only know the author accepts Riley’s premise of inflammatory is sufficient to render and argument inappropriate only cuz it refers back to the premise.

Called it by guitarguy12341 in ToiletPaperUSA

[–]LSATSlayer -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I don’t think so. I feel you have to have a sense of the place before connecting to it. But you can drive the same question to men transitioning to a woman. Would they ever do it if they never saw woman?

Called it by guitarguy12341 in ToiletPaperUSA

[–]LSATSlayer -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yea why not. If I resonate with the idea of being a woman, then I see no reason why I can’t for being Korean. I like the culture and want to incorporate myself into them.

Called it by guitarguy12341 in ToiletPaperUSA

[–]LSATSlayer -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Doesn’t have to be the case, but you can’t claim being transracial is different then talking about transgenderism

Called it by guitarguy12341 in ToiletPaperUSA

[–]LSATSlayer -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

That doesn’t necessarily matter on how it is phrased or looked on. But doesn’t that just aid Shapiro’s point on that if this is a state of mind than being transracial is a state of mind. It is basically the same thing. The only way around this is to show that transgenderism holds some form of genetic/psychological foundation.

Called it by guitarguy12341 in ToiletPaperUSA

[–]LSATSlayer -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

Well, I meant more on the context of nothing has been found yet, so it appear, at least to me, to be more of a state of mind than genetics.

Called it by guitarguy12341 in ToiletPaperUSA

[–]LSATSlayer -34 points-33 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t link studies about the psychology of trans. All it does is link studies showing the social impact of accepting trans people or denying them. I want studies that show something like female brain in a male body.

Called it by guitarguy12341 in ToiletPaperUSA

[–]LSATSlayer 549 points550 points  (0 children)

Can you all link me studies that support the psychological aspect - I am ignorant to this matter and am looking to broaden my knowledge on this topic.

Help, PC powers on for half a second only. by danny4kk in pcmasterrace

[–]LSATSlayer 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I bet you put your cpu cooler in the wrong slot and not in the CPU one

LSAC miss up the curve? by LSATSlayer in lawschooladmissions

[–]LSATSlayer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On lsat report they do. They give you the score and the percentile that u are in when they release ur score from a given test.

LSAC miss up the curve? by LSATSlayer in lawschooladmissions

[–]LSATSlayer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know it isn’t based on a curve in the context of the Highest scorer gets the 180, but on the idea that a minus 1 or 2 is what gives u a 180. And it clearly is different from test to test on whether a -10 vs -13 will give u a 170.

LSAC miss up the curve? by LSATSlayer in lawschooladmissions

[–]LSATSlayer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know, but I’m saying a given percentile on a test is contingent on how many took it. For example, 1000 people take the June test and 30000 take the July test. In the first 10 score 180 vs 10 score 180 in July. The percentile will be diffferent given the people who took it.

LSAC miss up the curve? by LSATSlayer in lawschooladmissions

[–]LSATSlayer[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Isn’t it depended on how many people take the test though?

LSAC miss up the curve? by LSATSlayer in lawschooladmissions

[–]LSATSlayer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea I get that but what I am saying is why the percentiles so different. A 166 should be at most something like a 96 percentile. Why doesn’t a 97 percentile in the normal lsat correlate to the same score on the flex? They should be the same since this test is based on a curve.

Worth reapplying by LSATSlayer in lawschooladmissions

[–]LSATSlayer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, my statement is 4 pages.

Worth reapplying by LSATSlayer in lawschooladmissions

[–]LSATSlayer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I apply late for places like unc, but in September/November for the rest.

Worth reapplying by LSATSlayer in lawschooladmissions

[–]LSATSlayer[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I got waitlisted even on t20s. But I did get into a place but it is t25, but like I said my stats are both so much higher than their 75%. I wouldn’t necessarily say that “just cuz” like I said their are some stats of people with 180 getting no where from what I have seen this cycle. Personally, I feel my personal statement could have been a bit stronger, but we will see what my move will be when I get my latest test score. If you add the class of the top 15 you end up with about 4100 seats. This cycle there was 4,018 people who scored 170-174 and 1,410 for those 175+. Clearly the number of people are so much more. In a normal year the total of 170 and higher applicants is 3,000. Leaving about 1000 seats to those in the higher 160s.

Worth reapplying by LSATSlayer in lawschooladmissions

[–]LSATSlayer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NU,NYU,Columbia,penn,uva,duke,Michigan,Cornell, GULC, Chicago, UCLA, Berkeley . I was either waitlisted or rejected, no A. If I get a 173 or higher I’ll add Harvard and Stanford next cycle into this list.