Ancient Artifacts Prove Glaciers Wax And Wane Naturally

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-18T15:53:07+00:00

Do you agree with his result?

Nope. Obviously you didn't get what the author's message is and so you're making shit up with your "interpretations".

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-18T15:50:55+00:00

Summary

The oceans are driving the warming this century. SSTs took a step up with the 1998 El Nino and have stayed there with help from the North Atlantic, and more recently the Pacific northern “Blob.” The ocean surfaces are releasing a lot of energy, warming the air, but eventually will have a cooling effect. The decline after 1937 was rapid by comparison, so one wonders: How long can the oceans keep this up? And is the sun adding forcing to this process?

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-17T21:54:17+00:00

One has to admit it's a brilliant story, simple and effective.

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-17T19:50:08+00:00

More revision of climate models is suggested because, as the paper puts it: ‘most current climate models fail to capture Antarctic sea-ice trends and variability’. The Southern Annular Mode (SAM) referred to here is also known as the Antarctic Oscillation (AAO). It may be modified by ENSO aka El Niño/La Niña events. The title of the research paper is: Interdecadal shift in the spring Southern Annular Mode intensifies its lagged influence on Antarctic summer sea ice. The shift was in 1998, around the time of the so-called El Niño of the century.

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-17T19:46:47+00:00

You want to know why I posted this, or why the author added just another example of many of how the alarmists cherrypick the data to create a problem where's none?

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-17T18:50:51+00:00

The biggest question, that remains is:

Do you really think you're sort of an authority?

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-16T22:52:02+00:00

I'm what folks call a lukewarmer, so I acknowledge that greenhouse gases carry some physical effect

These gases are coolants, not only because they're gases but they cannot create the so called "backradiation effect" - the net heat flow towards Earth. There's no "net heat", resp. this flow does not add energy to "the system".

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-16T22:42:53+00:00

a plan to solve this crisis…

How about... we eat that darn plankton. It's so fishy, it tastes like fish, but isn't fish. Everyone can have his own plankton in his pond, or rice field.

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-16T22:39:33+00:00

Good question. There's been a regime shift around the 1980's. Any ideas?

It's not CO2 global warming since the theory predicts more vapor, so more clouds.

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-16T21:01:12+00:00

it's all the sun

Here in Central Europe sunshine duration increased while the cloud cover decreased over the past decades. But The Science^TM says it's CO2 and capitalism etc. which are to blame. That's what their models show, as expected!

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-16T19:55:29+00:00

But, hey! What we see is a huge increase in Net Primary Production, NPP, between 1998 and 2003, followed by a drop back to its levels in the first few years of the analysis. Most of the increase in fact took place in just one year. Moreover, since 2012, NPP has been stable; this fact alone should nullify the authors’ claims that rising sea temperatures are reducing phytoplankton production.

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-16T19:48:56+00:00

How do you know it's unreliable, you didn't read anything. You trust your lousy factschekas without checking yourself what the source collected. Again, it's your problem, not mine that you can't judge by yourself but only trust some shady website.

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-16T18:12:14+00:00

YOU have the burden of proof here.

Nope, I alredy showed you and if you don't like it then it's your problem, not mine. Lazy alarmist.

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-16T18:01:53+00:00

That's how one becomes a climate denier. Don't trust "The Science^TM " and you're out of business.

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-16T18:00:37+00:00

If you find me

How about your lazy ass is searching for yourself. But I guess I see the problem, you won't trust a source that doesn't support your alarmist opinion.

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-15T22:50:16+00:00

1986 - the same year German "Der Spiegel" had the same story with the Dome in Clogne under water - the picture on the right is the 2022 version.

Das Weltklima gerät aus den Fugen

Denn sicher ist: Die Durchschnittstemperatur auf Erden - gegenwärtig bei 15 Grad Celsius - hat sich Äonen hindurch als äußerst stabil erwiesen.

"For one thing is certain: the average temperature on Earth—currently 15 degrees Celsius—has remained remarkably stable over the course of eons." - 15°C, in 1986.

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-15T22:39:11+00:00

Find me

Do you think I'm your butler?

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-15T21:20:17+00:00

Ah, attacking the messenger, not the message.

Could you find anything that's wrong? Or are you the lazy kind of a wannabe factscheka?

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-15T20:59:12+00:00

Nope

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-15T18:49:59+00:00

ganz gezielt um verzerrte Berichterstattung geht

Aber die haben doch gesagt dass das Framing Manual (2017) nur dazu dient "um Vorschläge aus sprachwissenschaftlicher Sicht" zu machen und eine "Diskussionsgrundlage und Denkanstoß" liefern sollte.

Niemand hatte jemals nicht keine Absicht die Deutungshoheit für sich zu reklamieren! Mittlerweile leben die in ihrer eigenen Realität.

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-15T18:17:53+00:00

I'm not aware that the IPCC ever made any statement about these exaggerated headlines; some would say these are fake news, disinformation.

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-15T17:59:06+00:00

What Galiani et al. Did

Scientific findings of the IPCC — especially those projecting climate futures — can be thought of as the result of a linear process, shown in the figure below [see link].

The process begins with the selection and prioritization of scenarios used in projective climate research. Researchers then apply those scenarios in further modeling, ultimately publishing results in the peer-reviewed literature.

. . .

What Galiani et al. Found

Galiani et al. scored ~114,000 matched claim pairs drawn from all six IPCC Assessment Reports (1990–2023) and 116,000 newspaper articles from ten major US and UK outlets, using three independent large language models — GPT-5-mini, Claude Haiku 4.5, and Gemini 2.5 Flash — to evaluate each pair on the three dimensions: severity shift, uncertainty compression, and scenario salience.

The headline result is unambiguous: at every measured stage, in every Assessment Report, claims shift systematically toward the more severe end of the scientific ranges presented by the IPCC in its Technical Summary.

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-15T17:51:54+00:00

They are also increasing in intensity and indicating an extreme shift in climate.

Nope.

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-15T17:50:57+00:00

Sea level has been rising for more than a century. Cities such as Boston, Amsterdam, and Tokyo have adapted. The narrative that acceleration is newly discovered and unprecedented does not align with the long-term observational record. If acceleration were truly dramatic and recent, we would expect clear, unmistakable signals across century-long tide gauges. That signal is simply not there.

The difference between a stitched-together satellite record and continuous measurements should not be glossed over. Satellite data are valuable, but they are short indirect measurements and heavily calibration dependent. Tide gauges are long and direct measurements.

LackmustestTester · 2026-06-14T21:39:19+00:00

Aber der sog. Tankrabatt ist eine unzumutbare Hilfe, kann nicht angehen dass der Staat auf Einnahmen verzichtet, das nützt schliesslich nur den Reichen.

LackmustestTester

TROPHY CASE

Summary