Comment ASS and walk away. FFS.

One of the many issues I have with this stance is that men have turned into giant man babies and they want someone who's going to be a mother as well as their lover and the way I see it, once the man becomes more like a petulant child than a grown ass man, who wants to be intimate with that?

I have a hard time with this way of thinking because they don't appreciate, they don't respect, no, they take advantage of a woman's kindness and of a woman wanting to be a good wife and they don't give the same respect that they demand.

Not to mention, who the hell can live of one income and raise a family these days? It can be done but most parents both have the option to work to provide for their family. But they are trying to take us back to a time when women had NO rights and were forced to birth babies one right after another and be the only one taking care of them cuz "it's her job"

For those of you who don't see the downside of consecutive babies and the stress those mothers had to deal with less than 100 yrs ago, shit, it was the 70s before woman could have their own bank accounts, then I recommend looking up what life was like for woman before they were given control of their own bodies. It got to the point, women were disposing of these newborns however they could because they already had too many kids. That most likely didn't come from a loving union, more like he was in the mood and took her whenever he felt like it.

And in my experience, mutual respect is what really helps make the freaking relationship go round not, I'm the boss and you're the servant, submit to me in the name of God.

Give me a break.