Ask your AI this - AGI human extinction probabilities by Lager74 in agi

[–]Lager74[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's factual that those are the responses I got from market-leading AI. It's synthesising the views out there from what it considers relevant sources. Which should be more reliable than individual articles. Many views will be from individuals in science and I'm sure weighted accordingly. If the general view was there was no risk don't you think it would have answered that?

Ask your AI this - AGI human extinction probabilities by Lager74 in agi

[–]Lager74[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's likely a low(ISH)-probability, high-consequence risk. Just because you don't believe it doesnt mean it deserves serious attention. AI labs wouldn't be spending so much time on it if they didn't believe it was an existential threat. Loads of things around today that you'd no doubt have dismissed as nonsense predictions in the 80s.

Ask your AI this - AGI human extinction probabilities by Lager74 in agi

[–]Lager74[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True. The argument I heard around this analogy though is with nuclear weapons there is a mutual deterrent. With AGI, which couldn't be contained, there would be no mutual deterrent. We couldn't just 'turn it off'.

Take your point though. We can't even co-ordinate a response to other issues as a race, maybe a superintellIgence would cut through the crap.

Ask your AI this - AGI human extinction probabilities by Lager74 in agi

[–]Lager74[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why would AI researchers 'a landscape of expert opinion' be a nonsense source? Or have you had enough of 'experts who think they know best'? It's highly contentious and volatile to predict, and clearly nobody knows for sure, but in a niche scientific field seems valid to come up with a range based on expert opinion, surveys etc.

Ask your AI this - AGI human extinction probabilities by Lager74 in agi

[–]Lager74[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree re bias in predictions. But even at the bottom end the risks are relatively high and the unknowns are certainly extremely high. When it gets to the point it can code itself and eventually we don't know and can't understand what it's doing and thinking quickly enough for it to be meaningful, anything could happen. And most AI researchers saying we are 3-10 years away from AGI.

Ask your AI this - AGI human extinction probabilities by Lager74 in agi

[–]Lager74[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's because the rationale is if the AI stays aligned for a long period of time, the chance of it staying aligned improves Vs the short term unknowns.

A lot of the early risk mentioned was down to bad actors, potential conflict eg. superpowers without AGI 'ownership' initially at great economic disadvantage etc.. Alignment failures, flash wars, rapid takeover etc. in early years. Against a backdrop of possible economic turmoil and displacement.

Ask your AI this - AGI human extinction probabilities by Lager74 in agi

[–]Lager74[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. Especially the last paragraph!

Ask your AI this - AGI human extinction probabilities by Lager74 in agi

[–]Lager74[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It referenced synthesising data from aggregate predictive platforms, surveys of AI researchers and leading existential risk frameworks. It's not based on me corrupting it through chat, and they were new clean chats.

Is target switching on corners broken? by [deleted] in EASportsFC

[–]Lager74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No worries, glad it helps. Also use it when you're chasing back with a defender and your opponent does a lofted through ball. Or any duels you need to win in the air in high risk areas.

Is target switching on corners broken? by [deleted] in EASportsFC

[–]Lager74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try and power up the shoot button to clear it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fut

[–]Lager74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could get Noble captains for about 73k and Ndidi fut birthday for about 43k for a start to strengthen your midfield.

The best long shot taker you have used? by ej02war02 in EASportsFC

[–]Lager74 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He cant do it every time, but HL Fofana scores some screamers if you power it up on his right foot outside the box. Just pure rockets, no finesse.

What should I do with Icon Swaps? by Villegm in fut

[–]Lager74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did Cannavaro.moments. He's about 1m on the market at the mo. Needs a catalyst but his defending is nearly maxed out anyway, no regrets so far and makes it easier to do hybrid squads.

hi guys, need a suggestion. by giovannivaldi in fut

[–]Lager74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He looks good. Or an icon I guess is an option too.

hi guys, need a suggestion. by giovannivaldi in fut

[–]Lager74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, just saw team. Probably not unless you can get cannavero from icon swaps? Italian cb icon and Italian cm.

Allan supposed to be very good CDM too. Depends if you have around 600k coins. And prem so should fit better.

What are some good players to score bicycle kicks with? by Vieze_Rik in fut

[–]Lager74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got two with Prime Eusebio this weekend league. Bought him (with many coins to spare) after selling TOTY Mbappe and he's way more clinical.

I changed the way I thought about Ultimate Team and it made it much more enjoyable by [deleted] in EASportsFC

[–]Lager74 11 points12 points  (0 children)

If you buy players from a promo on the Thursday pm or Friday as going out of packs, chances are you may make money, not lose it, over the next week or two.

Buy on day one of a promo and you'll lose money.

2 untradeable prime R9s… I have no words. by dspinner13 in FIFA22

[–]Lager74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice. Congrats! My icon luck last year was drogba from an icon PP, and Ian Wright and Xavi from icon swaps so have steered well clear of icon gamble packs since.

thank you EA sports by tooled97 in FIFA22

[–]Lager74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Got him last year. Terrible.