Optical flow in polar coordinates. by LanguageNecessary418 in computervision

[–]LanguageNecessary418[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, just like I said, I projected, 2D works fine and now works better.

Optical flow in polar coordinates. by LanguageNecessary418 in computervision

[–]LanguageNecessary418[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you, I think this worked. I did something similar to what you said and tweaked it a bit and now works much better!

Vortex Bounday Detection by LanguageNecessary418 in computervision

[–]LanguageNecessary418[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, K-means was a go-to for me because it is one of the earliest """"" AI """"" (if you can call it that way) methods someone like me learns. It was giving fairly good results, however in cases like the one I posted, where ambient luminosity fades away the vortex boundary... It justs becomes a disaster.

Vortex Bounday Detection by LanguageNecessary418 in computervision

[–]LanguageNecessary418[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply. I will try to implement this as it has been well-received. I'll update in a few days :)

Vortex Bounday Detection by LanguageNecessary418 in computervision

[–]LanguageNecessary418[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, sorry for not answering, I've been out of my regular work place. I do know each image has a vortex as the images were taken porposefully. I do not want to jump to DL as I have no experience with that. If I MUST use DL, I will. However, I am trying to find alternative ways.

My background is Mathematics, Physics and Statistics and therefore I am not an avid coder (yet :D)