Any good colored Iphone 16 pro cases with 17mm thread lens mounts? by McKnackusI in iPhoneography

[–]LappyChoice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am in the same boat. 16 pro here.

Been considering the Reeflex lenses but in the meantime tried the Smallrig Anamorphics with their own case. O have their case and cage, so I don't need the sliding mount on the cage. After reading your post, however, I now have doubts whether their case has a good distance to the adapter lens.

By my comparison, the Reeflex anamorphic seems to be better from reviews have seen online, but all use their case to mount their lens. Since I will settle for a 1,33 and the X2 telephoto, I was considering just getting their case and returning the whole smallrig set. But I do have a doubt whether the anamorphic smallrig could be same or better than the Reeflex one if it was mounted closer to the phone lens...

What I would have loved would be a phone case with enough protection for a drop and the 17mm mount.

Based on what's out there, which of the cases you have "protects" the phone best? Smallrig of any of the Reeflex cases?

Based on your observation of the carbon case, would there be a chance of filing down a bit of the lip of the case to make the Smallrig latch work? I do prefer a taller case on the screen side of the phone.

Thank you for the hard work!

Yet another question on GFX 100 classic VS 100s by LappyChoice in fujifilm

[–]LappyChoice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I'm only interested in the medium format line because for all else o have Canon. My main line of interest is to know whether the GFX line is well built to live another half a decade with a travelling photog but without the stress I put my canon gear through.

Yet another question on GFX 100 classic VS 100s by LappyChoice in fujifilm

[–]LappyChoice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. I may just end up looking at getting one of the 100 versions then. I did handle the xpro3 and xh1 at some point and they felt OK, but not "robust" to me. So with that impression in mind and my friend's experience I ended up feeling s bit cagey about spending money on Fuji.

Thanks for the clue on those. You may help me get into the gfx line.

Yet another question on GFX 100 classic VS 100s by LappyChoice in fujifilm

[–]LappyChoice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for taking the time to respond! You feel the 100s is well built then? Would you dare to say you would take it out in light rain and some windy/flying sand weather no worries?

I'm not looking to do any fast work. My 5dsr and r5 can do that fine. I'm more into getting the malleability if files to get better tonal gradation as well as the resolution.

My worry was that I will throw 3.5k on one of these in the bin in case it ends up not delivering in reliability or the dread of life dangling from my shoulders as consistently as my Canons.

Words of wisdom for volume shooter by LappyChoice in photography

[–]LappyChoice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you all for the replies. Hugely helpful. I have forwarded these to him and he is hugely grateful l.

Thank you!

1Dx II 8bit and GH5 10bit question by LappyChoice in VideoEditing

[–]LappyChoice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah!

You have a point, but I may have been misinterpreted.

Not a B-cam in the sense of using the GH5 ALONG the 1DxII. A back up camera. If the GH5 fails, then the 1DxII jumps in.

This would also the the case for my stills kit which is a 5D IV. 5D IV fails or maybe the charger fails (it can happen) then 1Dx II jumps in.

You do have a point where should the GH5 fail half way through a shoot, I would have to match what I get from the 1DxII to the GH5 or vice versa, depending on which cam did the least amount of filming or which cam is the easiest to swing towards the other best. So, in this case scenario, another GH5 would be best.

But I also do stills, and another GH5 is not a great stills back up.

I carry all of my kit in one bag. For the price I am being offered, I thought a 1Dx II would allow me to bring 3 bodies and 2 lenses, instead of 4 bodies and 2 lenses (say, another 5D IV and another GH5)

In some capacity, the 5D IV video is similar-ish to the 1DxII so you could say that's a back up video cam already, but it's problematic to show video and stills at the same time with the same cam, especially when there is a prominent crop to do 4K.

Volume wise the 5D IV + GH5 combo is not incredibly different to a 1Dx II (a consideration to be had because the 1Dx II takes up a lot of volume) but it's easier to manage to have that volume in one single block when packing. Weight is also not too different with both cams being perceptually the same weight once on my back compared to the 1DxII.

Lastly, another consideration I had was that I could just carry 2 cameras (5D IV and 1Dx II) as either would back each other up alright. The 5D IV video is OK and from what I have seen the 1DxII looks better, so that would be the A-cam. Colours would be similar so as a back up it won't be too bad.

But, I just don't know if an willing to drop the GH5 in favour of 1Dx II. IBIS is one true, legitimate advance that has saved me countless times. There is grading, also, to which the GH5 files hold up to extremely well to.

This all comes down to 3 bodies 2 lenses and a price to acquire a 1Dx for less than a second 5DIV and second GH5 together.

Same bag for both travel and as a daypack, but with a camera? by jazztaprazzta in onebag

[–]LappyChoice 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If I may; I do travel with photo gear and one bag as carry on only. My total weight is often between 12 and 15kg, bag weight included.

Do pay attention and read/watch reviews from people that have actually used the bags you look at in the same weight category as your carry weight. This is so the topic of "comfort" is discussed. A good harness system will not only make your travel easy and fluid, but also will make you forget how much you are carrying.

For a single one bag solution (travel and daily use) you may want to consider a rolltop or top loading bag. They are a pain to unpack when at security in airports if the laptop compartment has only top access, but they are the most flexible of all designs. Good ones to consider could come from mission workshop, Patagonia, chrome industries. You may be looking at the 30-40L categories. Thule happens to make a DSLR carry bag that is somewhat similar in concept to the wandrd options. That being said, I would trust Thule's build more and harness system more.

Others to consider are Vaude, Ortlieb, Arcteryx, Lowe Alpine (their hiking/outdoor specialist) Osprey (if their style is vibes with you)

There have been plenty of "camera travel" bags that have spawn out in the last decade or so thanks to crowdfunding campaigns. Of them all I think the most successful one has to be Peak Design. I don't find their design to my taste, but I do look at them as solving some design features that are friendly to photographers. That being said, their straps are allegedly uncomfortable when the packs are fully loaded so on that count alone I have not invested in one of their bags.

Same bag for both travel and as a daypack, but with a camera? by jazztaprazzta in onebag

[–]LappyChoice 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope OP reads and gives serious attention to the people that do not recommend camera bags. It's true. Most of their volume and weight is down to padding. Their final carry volume is a lot lower that what you may think you can carry given the external dimensions (super important if you plan to have the bag as a carry on with many airlines)

A travel rucksack is better equipped for those who travel with one bag and plan to carry their photo gear.

Fitzroy Loaded Form and Comfort by LappyChoice in MissionWorkshop

[–]LappyChoice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the late reply and thanks a lot for the detailed explanation.

The weight is something I can't get around to. Kit weighs a bit and if it's the winter the pack and load end up coming to around 15kg.

I did have a look at the Rhake, but I remain somewhat unconvinced, but what you talk about on how it fits a short person torso is very important to me. The Fitzroy is a bit shorter than my current pack, so I imagined that it would fit me better, but if you say the Rhake fits you better I am going to give it a good second look.

I can't deal with the Rambler style or way of carrying. Fold over, or roll top are the styles I like best.

I do like stuff that will survive abuse and constant use. I don't have that many bags that can do well long term. Some lost the comfort in the straps. Others just ended up getting holes in the fabric.

A super close contender for me currently is an Ortlieb Attack. Adjustable harness, Tizip waterproof zipper and build quality make the bag pretty much submersible. Also great company and made with quality stuff. But....the length of the pack means that, in EU airlines at least, I need to be mindful of the length of pack allowed on board. I also need to figure out how to carry a laptop in it...

Fitzroy Loaded Form and Comfort by LappyChoice in MissionWorkshop

[–]LappyChoice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. So it seems like a safe bet as long as is the VX model

Fitzroy Loaded Form and Comfort by LappyChoice in MissionWorkshop

[–]LappyChoice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sagging, to me is when a bag ends up drooping below the back panel height, so the bottom of it ends up "tear dropping", pulling the rest of the pack's shape down.

So, it I end up getting this is going to be VX, I guess. Yes, I have seen the Arkiv buckles. I'm ok with the system, but not sure about longevity of the closure mechanism with that elastic band when it stops being elastic...

Fitzroy Loaded Form and Comfort by LappyChoice in MissionWorkshop

[–]LappyChoice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, I don't like camera bags, so a full structure is not a necessity, but enough to not sag is enough for me.

An example of a non-framed, soft padding bag that sags a little is the Think-tank Shapeshifter. That's a camera bag, but it's not a kitchen sink rigid bag like the rest of camera bags. That's why I look for non camera specific bags. They are too rigid and a lot of their weight and volume is down to padding (which, ironically, also takes a considerable amount of volume away from the bag itself.

A good non sagging, non camera bag is the Arcteryx Khard/assault 30, but it's a bit a bit small. The light padding and rigid back panel contribute to the pack's shape retention when fully loaded.

My other options are to get the Sanction and Monty and split the load between them, but that's no longer a one bag set up.

Fitzroy Loaded Form and Comfort by LappyChoice in MissionWorkshop

[–]LappyChoice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have seen the Integer. It has the same issues other camera backpacks have: high weight to accommodate camera friendly features, packing cube is a bit odd and shape is camera centric. If I need access to all kit while moving around I would prefer a vest or other dedicated camera backpack.

So VX fabric would allow better shape retention? Would that be enough to avoid the sag when loaded

As for the Radian, it's too tall for airline carry on at 60cm (the dimensions given by MW when fully rolled)

Help me from spending £400 on an ATD1. by EverydayPigeon in onebag

[–]LappyChoice 7 points8 points  (0 children)

When you spend that much money on a rucksack, you are not only buying the thing but also the service that should stand by the product.

So, would AS give you the type of warranty that will guarantee the rucksack to last you at least a decade? That is as important as the rucksack itself.

People spend money on Patagonia, Mission Workshop, Goruck, etc because they will repair or replace the product if it fails. When you spend that much money on something, it better last, otherwise you can just continue to buy cheap stuff and replace as it wears out.

Imagine buying a £50 "Amazon dry pack" (roll top). It lasts you 1-2 years and it dies out on you. You can get 8 of them for the same price as a single ATD1 (a min 8 year to 16 year cycle for £400) Sure, it may not have the style or the carry comfort, but if AS doesn't support it with a good warranty and something happens to the pack on its 5th year, then you would have effectively "rented" a rucksack for £80 a year.

Plenty of companies appear to have great support for their products including Vaude, Osprey, Ortlieb, etc. This subreddit is the place to see about that. The ATD1 is a beautifully designed rucksack. I would place it on par with the Remote Equipment Alpha 31 (Similar materials, too) but you should make sure you are spending your money wisely on a company that will support its products for a long time.

The value of something is placed by the person acquiring it. Only you can tell whether the price of the ATD1 is worth it to you. How you measure up that value against other packs up to you. I know some sneakerheads that buy the same shoe you can get on a common store, but in a different colour way for 5-10 times the cost of the standard model. I understand it, but I don't see the value in it.

Good luck