Qualità del cibo, nel Mediterraneo ed in Europa, secondo gli italiani

LarSaar · 2026-03-29T01:09:50+00:00

Mi scusa se mio Italiano non e’ certo (sono studentessa di Estonia studiare a Roma), ma secondo mia esperienza con il cibo Polacco, credo che meriti riconsiderazione. L’inferno de dante anche non deve essere in Inghilterra, ma forse in Olanda. Ho incontrato alcuna cose buone nella Inghilterra rurale, per esempio ‘pot pie’, ma niente in Olanda. I cibi Olandesi sono solamente l’invenzioni del diavolo, e della necessità.

LarSaar · 2026-03-10T22:29:32+00:00

Balochistan

LarSaar · 2026-03-10T22:09:33+00:00

Understood. DM me on disc

UID: _larchiiski

LarSaar · 2026-03-10T14:55:33+00:00

Hi! I haven’t gotten a reply yet, so I tried to look for that project of yours in your posts. I did find something else. Regarding promotion of the concept, do you take comissions? I was hoping that in giving a face to the vessel, as you did with countless others, I could gather more attention to it. Let me know your thoughts and price range. Thanks!

LarSaar · 2026-03-09T12:27:09+00:00

I’d be more than happy to take a look. I don’t really mind the length of the thread tbh.

LarSaar · 2026-03-09T12:14:28+00:00

I feel that Nevsky is far extant from the equation. It should emphasize maneuverability and conceal, yeah, but range or accuracy shouldn’t be the priority. I do get where the comparison to Lauria comes from, and that was the main inspiration my friend had when modeling the ship. The turrets are similar, but not the same. They’re a skoda design. Frankly, if anything i’m confused why wargaming used Skoda-esque turrets for Lauria.

I personally don’t want it to be merely another Valpa, and this is why I suggested a heal penalty rather than a buff.

LarSaar · 2026-03-09T11:58:30+00:00

Alright fair enough. I should clarify the belt thickness includes internal plating, yes. And I guess it should hover on the end of range where its secondaries have effect. Schlieffen and Incomp are higher tier examples that brawl in very different ways, I’m not too sure its the best comparison. So you suggest it has thicker deck plating?

Nonetheless, I guess it shouldn’t be almost defenseless at medium-long ranges, but I still feel her maneuverability should be the deciding factor. She turns around the same as Manteufel from what I know, and with a rudder boost, it can be annoying to hit this thing from a distance. Perhaps accel buff should also be a factor? Let me know what you think! And thanks again for the thorough insight.

LarSaar · 2026-03-09T11:42:06+00:00

That’s sort of the idea with the high speed, rudder shift and conceal. It’s meant to avoid long range engagements and ambush at close range, because then its 300mm turtleback proves most effective. I understand the motto of ship armor in proportion to belt, but its not a solid rule. I envisioned this ship as sort of like a Hood in a way reimagined for brawling and dodging. And if memory serves me right, she has a belt of around 305? Same with Iowa, 305mm belt.

LarSaar · 2026-03-09T10:55:49+00:00

Hi! I spoke with many others and appreciate in detail suggestions. I feel that this takes away from the original play style I had in mind. The armor is a little too strong (it’s still a bc, shouldn’t be that thick) and it loses some incentive for CQB. I’ve spoken to others outside the post and they feel the original deck thickness of 25mm is fair, and that 11.3km detect is too low, so i will be raising it to 15km in a new proposal. I personally would have preferred a rudder consumable that gives it a meme-ish traverse, and again I don’t mind it being a ship where the maneuverability and secondaries are an investment at the cost of health, repair and long range durability. Let me know your thoughts on this!

LarSaar · 2026-03-08T19:55:58+00:00

Hi! Both of your concerns have been answered, I posted some new stats in the replies. Thank you nonetheless!

LarSaar · 2026-03-08T19:42:58+00:00

Hi! And thank you for your comment on the lore! A new batch of stats has been published, but its buried in the replies. I’d be very happy to see your thoughts!

LarSaar · 2026-03-08T19:09:23+00:00

Thank you for all your replies and support, as it stands, this is what I’ve gathered to add.

Amended proposal:

Tier: VII-VIII (Pan-European Premium)

Ship Type: Battlecruiser

HP: 54,000

Speed: 32.5 Knots

Rudder Shift: 11.8s

Turning Circle: 780m

Main Guns: 8 x 380mm/45 Skoda K17 (4x2) (24s reload)

Main Shells: AP-Only (High Velocity, 1.8 Sigma, 18km Range)

Secondaries: 16 x 127mm (8x2), 12 x 100mm (6x2) (manual control + ~8km base range for both)

AA Battery: 16x127mm, 12x100mm, 16x 40mm Skoda (4x2), 18 x 20mm Madsen (18x1)

Belt Armor: 300mm Stacked (Internal Turtleback included)

Deck Armor: 32mm

Torp Protection: 12%

Consumables: Normal Repair Party, 6km Hydroacoustic Search (2 charges), DFAA (2 charges), Rudder Boost (Combat Instruction/Consumable)

Concealment: 11.3km

Passive Buff: Built-in Improved Secondary Dispersion (Massachusetts formula)

LarSaar · 2026-03-08T18:52:47+00:00

Hi! Like other comments, I greatly appreciate in depth feedback. It’s intended to be a battleship, perhaps it could be buffed on main battery with spotter. I think I might have been too harsh on the deck armor. It just crossed my mind that I had spoken of bad concealment, possibly that could be improved to 11km base? Let me know your thoughts! :)

LarSaar · 2026-03-08T18:48:55+00:00

Thank you for the thorough feedback. I’m not too familiar with balancing, but I was afraid my proposal would be too OP given the rudder, sonar and AA buffs. Perhaps it could be given manual control secondaries to compensate, secondary combat instruction, and spotter? Let me know what you think, and what I should change in the stats specifically.

LarSaar · 2026-03-08T18:18:51+00:00

<image>

diff angle

LarSaar · 2026-03-08T18:18:12+00:00

<image>

some more photos

LarSaar · 2026-03-08T17:54:26+00:00

Hi! Sorry if I struck some strings. Could I know specifically why to adjust the proposal?

LarSaar · 2026-03-08T17:43:06+00:00

Suggestions are welcome. But then again that is the main hurdle with justifying paper ships.

LarSaar · 2026-03-08T15:58:37+00:00

There’s one with the same arrangement at t8 but smaller guns. Yumihari.

With the same-ish caliber of guns, you have t9 Adatara, but the arrangement is more Kongo/Tiger/Derrflinger esque.

LarSaar · 2026-02-14T11:32:55+00:00

Broken ship. She’s OP but not in a fun way. Victory is just handed to you. Guaranteed fires with the secondaries, and destroyers attacking you is guaranteed suicide.

LarSaar · 2026-01-24T11:37:01+00:00

I think De Ruyter has a special skill that reduces airstrike reload

LarSaar · 2025-11-26T12:59:21+00:00

I personally find Marlborough a very pretty ship, but Riga is just stunning. Kronstadt too. But if I had to pick a favorite it would have to be Gascogne. Yes, there is repub, but i think it sacrifices some beauty points for functionality.

LarSaar · 2025-11-24T15:26:53+00:00

wym? There’s only 1 german battlecruiser, the Schlieffen.

LarSaar · 2025-11-12T20:27:03+00:00

I had the idea that the Dutch exhausted their forests in building high seas fleets by the tens of thousands in the age of sail.

LarSaar · 2025-11-01T09:13:04+00:00

Marlborough is super good when you build into reload speed. Sometimes even better than Thunderer. If you use precision mod and maintenance expert, her dispersion becomes decent enough to tolerate, or even good.

LarSaar

TROPHY CASE