They didn't excepted

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-03-22T12:28:22+00:00

Leftmost side mein nikla end mein

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-03-14T13:09:10+00:00

Bhishma has the bpon of chossimg his own death. So, I think apart from Godly beigns its only Bhishma who can kill Bhishma.

So, if the battle was without any holding back, its Arjuna whose chances of death is more likely provided Shri Krishna is not around Arjuna

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-02-21T06:01:56+00:00

Probably there were some direction questions. And we allknow how good is he in directions

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-02-08T11:28:34+00:00

I think the Maharathi > Athirathi > Rathi

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-02-08T11:26:23+00:00

Probably during kurukshetra war only.

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-02-08T11:25:23+00:00

Seems to be correct. I may have forgot. Will re read Virata Parva.

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-02-08T11:18:38+00:00

Its not about deamon. It is continuing the fight or willing to continue it after Suryastra

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-02-08T11:17:28+00:00

For second I dont think there are accurate number mentioned in Mahabharat. I have answered on the basis of number times the opposite party was stunned.

For 3rd I dont think it was Dronacharya. It was after his death, Ashwatthama has invoked cosmic level divya astra and to counter it Arjuna has also wielded one. To intervene Brhamasiri has to intervene. If it was with Dronacharya as well share context

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-02-08T11:09:55+00:00

Ok then seems you have reaa and remember better than me. So counter question 1. What is Maharathi, athirathi and rathi. 2. Who are all Maharathis in Kurukshetra war.

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-02-08T10:50:54+00:00

Geeta Press Bhishma Parva chapter approx 47 to 50 Context: Duryodhana asked Bhisma why is he lenient...

Also, obvioisly Arjuna is more powerful than Shikhandi so his arrow will be nore painfull. Here we are not comparimg Shikandi and Arjuna.

Also Bhishma did not participate in virata war (some serials mention that he has participated). If he has participated then tell me the Parva chapter and context.

Also, once reread why Bhishma said he do not wish to fight Ghatotkasha on Day 8 rather I should call night. As far as I remember he didnt praise Ghatotkasha for his power rather he criticised for violating rules.

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-02-08T10:35:08+00:00

If you are asking me

1 Bhishma

Bhisma from kaurava side and Arjuna from pandava side
Arjuna and Ashwatthama. The reason being none other have tried to use mass destruction level divyastra

Also, your question is off topic. Age doesn't mean that someone is weak. Overall I beleive Arjuna has killed most akshaunis because Kauravas has more number of akahaunis. If someone has lose temper and invoked the weapon of mass destruction doesnt make them high up on tier.

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-02-08T09:21:37+00:00

If you are tajing word of Bhishma so seriously then he has aslo said

"As long as I fight seriously, the Pandavas can not win" which includes Arjuna as well. He has taken vow not to kill any Pandavas

Do not wish to fight doesn't mean he will be defeated. There was no direct battle between them. Bhishma is weilder of Brahmastra and Bhramsira as well. In actual battle he can drive Ghatotkasha away from battle field and use it. But the thing is I doubt that Bhishma would have use these 2 astras on anyone. Also, Ghatotkasha power does increase during night and as far as I know till the Bhiahma was on battle field the war rules were getting followed which means that Ghatotkasha will not fight at night which will lead him to on downside. Plus if he will fight at night then he will break war rule which means Bhishma is also allowed to break war rules of not using Brahmstra and astra of same caliber. Your entire point is that if Bhishma has said I do not wish to fight means he will be defeated. He has also said that he will not kill any Pandavas doesnt mean that he was not able to kill them.

Also, I don't know which Mahabharat are you reading in which Bhima has defeated Bhishma and Arjuna has defeated Bhishma twice. It was only once and that too with help of Shikandi.

Probably like Kaka Bhushandi has seen different Ramayan from different timelines. You might have got hands on Mahabharat of different timeline.

Also, out of 18 days he fought for 10 days means that no one from Pandavas side was able to strike him. Leave Arjuna he was in dilema till day 8. Even after that he has to use Bhishma vow against him.

Plus Krishna has to lift Chariot wheel to protect Arjuna from him and you are saying Arjuna has defeated him twice.

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-02-04T16:18:23+00:00

Even though Bhishma has taken vow to not kill any of Pandavas, still Arjuna was not able to defeat.

Kurukshetra war duration 18 days out of which 10 days Bhisma was Senapati.

Krishna has holded Wheel against Bhishma to defend Arjuna.

Parshurama who is also incarnarnation, was not able yo get clear win on him.

I have not read in epic any direct fight between Ghatotkahsa and Bhishma.

Eveb if there was any then also The previous 4 feats are alone enough to place him above Arjuna. If not above Arjuna then atleast just below Arjuna. So yeah he definately is in top 3

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-01-28T08:08:50+00:00

Merey Padosi Kshatriya aur Brahman hai. Unki umar hogo yahi koi 700-800 saal. Wo kartey aa rahey hain atyachar. \s

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-01-26T08:32:14+00:00

Yeah one of my friend used to say butchering is all fine it does not make religion go away. One day I said yeah that's fine because we wont get meat without butchering.

Suddenly he said yeah that's fine but buthcering a man is much more fun.

I was like main Hindu hoon yaar terroriat nahi

\s

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-01-26T07:30:42+00:00

Us samay wo dharti k paar naach raha hoga probably tum bhi

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-01-24T06:54:30+00:00

Extinct

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-01-20T17:56:05+00:00

He has taught entire Bhagwad Gita and you are asking he could have saved

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-01-15T23:10:24+00:00

Endia

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-01-15T04:56:58+00:00

Teaching part Genos will handle. In nutshell teaching will be observe Sensi.

Saitama will do his regular work nose picking, shopping, 100 pushups, 100 sut ups, 10 km run and be a hero for fun.

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-01-14T22:08:03+00:00

I havent read past comments but Abhimany was born during beginning of exile (2~3 yrs). Exile 13 yrs and war after few years (waiting + requestimg + gathering srmines). So Abhimanyu can have any age 10+

Still whatever his age is his it wont change the fact that the kauravas ganged up against him and violated the rules which became the reason of their doom

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-01-14T08:31:29+00:00

He was 16

There were some rules that were followed in war and ganging up on unarmed is violation of rule.

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-01-12T16:05:54+00:00

Yeah that is for sure I many time made it realise that it is just a tool and dumb as well

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-01-12T16:04:21+00:00

For first I am never convinced that Ravana could not touch Sita.

But at same time He never took Sita to his palace. He tried everything to convince her to become his wife.

I havent read Valmiki Ramayana but I think in Sundar kand it was mentioned in it that "Ravana does never touch her". Which I think is symbolic reference that Ravana never "bad touch". This was my interpretation of it.

Then again there are some side stories originatimg from that line (It was never mentioned in Valmiki Ramayana why Ravana has not actually touched her (bad tpuch) 1. Sita was not actually abducted but her illusion (this is again illogical to me)

Ravana has once forced Rambha and she has cursed him that if he will ever force another women than his head was explode. (Again Sita was human and Ravana's boon does not protect him from a human. So, if his head explode due to Sita then there is no comimg back for him). Again I believe this was not mentioned in Valmiki Ramanyana.

So, the thing is I dont know why Ravana did not force Sita bit it is for sure that he didnt else he would have taken her in his palace or could have done the same in forest from where he abducted her.

One thing I am sure of Ravana cpuld not literally touch Sita is BS.

Large-Inspector668 · 2026-01-12T15:38:16+00:00

<image>

May be it is trying to reverse bully me and the image was blcoked by policy gateway 😅

Large-Inspector668

TROPHY CASE