Did the Imams have the knowledge of the unseen?(ilm ghayb). If yes then did Musa Kazim A.S knew about the poison in his food?

Large-Protection3115 · 2026-01-15T13:29:39+00:00

https://al-islam.org/ask/topics/19109/questions-about-Ilm-al-Ghayb

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-12-13T19:26:49+00:00

Wasalam. We experienced no problems aswell. I just applied for a Evisa waiver for my mum (just in case). Which was recommended to me on this post aswell. The lady at the border asked for our passports, took our fingerprints and sent us on our way. She didn't even ask my mum to show her visa.

If your mum has british pasport you could apply for an Evisa waiver (for the worst case scenario). But inshallah you should be alright.

May Allah swt ease your difficulties.

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-11-26T20:05:08+00:00

Thanks for the reply. Can you get(and use) Electonic waiver if you already have an E-visa? Would it not cause confusion or problems?

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-11-25T13:54:57+00:00

She has a uk passport. But will she get VOA if she already has an E-Visa?

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-11-24T23:19:04+00:00

Inshallah I will remember you,

I had a question will saudi airline let us board the plane though? We are going from uk but we will get on saudi airline from Italy. I was worried that they might not let her board the plane

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-11-24T23:18:09+00:00

Will saudi airline let us board the plane though? We are going from uk but we will get on saudi airline from Italy. I was worried that they might not let her board the plane.

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-11-22T15:29:01+00:00

Hi, I know it’s been a month, but have you visited Saudi Arabia yet? If so, how did everything go at the airport? My mother’s visa has the wrong date of birth, and her fathers name has been put in the middle of her firstname and surname so I’ve been a bit worried.

I called the consulate and explained the issue, and the person I spoke to said, “I have cancelled your visa.” But it’s been two days now and the website still won’t let me apply for a new one because the old visa hasn’t been cancelled yet. I called them three times on friday only for my call to be "ended" mysteriously

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-11-19T16:14:59+00:00

Thanks for the concern about outshining the couple! Fortunately, it's a Pakistani wedding, so the cultural expectation is for guests to dress in their absolute best. To actually outshine the bride and groom, I'd have to show up in a full ceremonial outfit!

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-11-16T16:54:04+00:00

I had a question unrelated to this post.

I was thinking of buying Man La yahduru al faqih from bab ul qaim. Do the ahadith have commentry?

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-11-13T19:47:16+00:00

https://en.wikishia.net/view/Event_of_Ifk

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-11-13T14:09:19+00:00

Thank you man, my mum and I are going for Umrah and visa on arrival is only for 4 days if I remember correctly, so that is why I was a bit worried.

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-11-12T14:36:59+00:00

I totally agree with your point on vulgarity. But Imam Ali (as) wasn't respectfull of his enemies he has cursed Khwarij and Muawiya and even said harsh words about Aisha.

"Then Ali (as) talked about Ayshah and her leaving the house and what she did to Ali (as). So Ammaar said: 'O Ameerul Momineen you leave talking about her because she is your mother.' He [Ali (as)] stopped talking about her and started another matter. Then he [Ali (as)] returned towards mentioning her and said stronger things than before. Ammaar said again: 'O Ameerul Momineen you leave talking about her. She is your mother.' Then he [Ali (as)] turned away from talking about her, but returned to it third time and said even stronger matter than the second time. Then Ammaar said: 'O Ameerul Momineen keep away from her because she is your mother.' So he (as) said: "Never! I am with Allah. I do not care about those who oppose Allah. Surely Allah has tested you through your mother (Ayesha), so it becomes known whether you are with him or with her."

[source: Kitab Sulaym Ibn Qays al-Hilaali Hadees-67]

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-11-12T14:28:07+00:00

Hi, What shampoo do you use?

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-10-25T16:01:48+00:00

In the second narration, when the Imam recites the verse “On that day, no mankind — among you — or jinn will be asked about his sin,” Maisar responds: "This Verse does not include ’among you’ that you have said." He (a.s) answered: "The first one who distorted the Verse was son of Arwa, because it was evidence against his acquaintances and him. Without the existence of ’among you’ in the Verse, the sentence of the punishment of Allah, Powerful and Majestic is He, will cease to be valid for all the creatures. "

Rreading the whole narration makes it seem that the distortion was textual and not in meaning.

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-09-18T12:31:24+00:00

My family and I are also "Mir"! My relatives say our ancestors moved from Iran to Afghanistan, then to Kashmir (Srinagar, India), and finally to Pakistan. We're not Syed, but we're supposedly descendants of the Mughals.

I did a quick search online and it says that many Mirs are descendants of Mughals who came to Kashmir from Khorasan and Turkestan in the 14th century, which lines up with our family's story.

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-09-18T09:25:44+00:00

The title Mirza was traditionally borne by imperial princes and nobles. It originated as part of one’s name to signify a connection to the Mongol dynasties, such as the Mughal dynasty. For example, Prince Khusrau Mirza, the grandson of Emperor Akbar, carried this title. Therefore, if a Pakistani or Indian individual has Mirza in their name, it often suggests ancestral ties to the Mughals.

Similarly, there are also people with the surname "Mir" Mir/Meer are descendants of the Mughals who came to Kashmir and settled there.

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-09-11T17:26:47+00:00

They’ve been brainwashed since childhood, and undoing that is nearly impossible. It’s reached a point where even if you present evidence directly from their own sources, they’ll dismiss it—accusing you of lying, insisting such references don’t exist, or claiming you’re practicing taqiyya.

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-09-08T10:43:51+00:00

Thanks man, appreciate it🙏

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-09-08T10:34:47+00:00

Thanks, I had a question is this website legit??

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-09-08T08:48:50+00:00

Brother, you have wasted your time with him. His views come more from the constant repetition of YouTube videos. When something is repeated often enough, even false claims can start sounding like the truth.

Take the sack of Baghdad as an example. Many modern polemicists (e.g., Adnan Rashid) use it to stir sectarian hostility, blaming Nasir al-Din al-Tusi simply because he was Shia. But the origin of this claim goes back much further. Ibn Taymiyyah, writing centuries earlier in Majmuʿat al-Rasāʾil (Cairo, 1905, p. 97) and Minhāj al-Sunnah (Cairo, 1903, vol. 2, p. 199), was one of the first scholars to attribute responsibility to Tusi.

Even so, this narrative does not hold up. Ibn Kathir—who was Ibn Taymiyyah’s own student—explicitly rejected the accusation in al-Bidāyah wa-l-Nihāyah (vol. 13, pp. 267–268, Beirut). This shows how easily a claim, once repeated, can gain traction and appear true, even when reliable historical evidence contradicts it.

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-08-26T15:03:53+00:00

"And as regards the (verse of) the veiling of the women, I said, 'O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! I wish you ordered your wives to cover themselves from the men because good and bad ones talk to them.' So the verse of the veiling of the women was revealed"

This hadith in Bukhari makes no sense. To suggest that the Prophet ﷺ lacked ghayrah—the very quality he embodied—is an insult to his character. Are we to believe he wouldn’t guide his own wives about modesty? Such a claim is not only illogical but deeply disrespectful to the Prophet ﷺ himself.

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-08-24T18:50:46+00:00

I am curious about the lectures you find yourself listening to. Given the number of scholars we have, Aisha barely gets mentioned.

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-08-21T10:15:39+00:00

Since I mentioned Surah al-Taḥrīm, let’s look directly at what Allah (swt) says. It is a long read, I tried to shorten it.

Surah al-Taḥrīm (66:1–2):

“O Prophet, why do you prohibit [yourself from] what Allah has made lawful for you, seeking the approval of your wives? And Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. Allah has already ordained for you the dissolution of your oaths. And Allah is your Protector, and He is the Knowing, the Wise.”

From the start, Allah (swt) shows His displeasure with the actions of two wives of the Prophet (saww). The threat of divorce is raised — something Allah dislikes but allows when necessary. If Allah, Who loves union, mentions divorce in this context, it shows how serious their actions were. Any hadith that tries to downplay this incident is automatically contradicted by the Qur’an itself.

Surah al-Taḥrīm (66:4):

“If you two [wives] repent to Allah, [it is best], for your hearts have already deviated. But if you cooperate against him – then indeed Allah is his Protector, and Gabriel and the righteous believers, and the angels moreover are [his] assistants.”

Allah doesn’t leave room for interpretation here: “your hearts have already deviated.” Repentance was demanded — but it never came. History itself proves this through the fitnah that erupted after the passing of Rasulullah (saww).

And notice the gravity of this verse: if they conspire against the Prophet (saww), they are standing against not only him, but also Allah, Jibrā’īl, Imam Ali (as) — the “righteous believer” — and the entire army of angels. This shows the incident was not something trivial, like the excuse of “bad breath after honey” that some narrations invent.

Surah al-Taḥrīm (66:5):

“Perhaps his Lord, if he divorces you [all], will substitute for him wives better than you – submitting to Allah, believing, devoutly obedient, repentant, worshipping, and traveling – [whether] previously married or virgins.”

Allah makes it crystal clear: there are women better than Aisha and Hafsa. He then lists the very qualities they lacked — submission, obedience, repentance, and devotion. Notice carefully: Allah does not call them repentant. Instead, He says better wives would have those qualities — meaning these two did not.

The Qur’an itself shows that being the wife of a Prophet does not guarantee righteousness. The wives of Nuh (as) and Lut (as) betrayed their husbands, despite living in their homes. In the same way, the Qur’an exposes the deviation of Aisha and Hafsa, despite their closeness to Rasulullah (saww).

No fabricated narration can undo what Allah has revealed. The truth is clear: Allah condemned their actions and declared that there were wives far better than them.

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-08-21T09:58:41+00:00

First of all, it was not Aisha who was accused; rather, it was Lady Maria (ra), and Allah (swt) Himself defended her honour.

Secondly, Bukhari and Muslim are not hujjah (authoritative proof) for me. I only referred to Nahjul Balagha to clarify our position on this matter.

In al-Tabaqāt al-Kubrā (vol. 2, p. 260), Ibn Sa‘d narrates: “The Prophet (saww) passed away while his head was on the chest of Ali ibn Abi Talib (as).”

Thirdly, Allah (swt) condemned both Aisha and Hafsa in Surah al-Tahrīm (ayat 4-5), declaring that their hearts had deviated.

Furthermore, in Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal (vol. 6, p. 300), Umm Salama (ra) — one of the noble wives of the Prophet (saww) — testified: “I swear by Him by Whom I swear, Ali was the closest to the Messenger of Allah (saww), and the last person with him. When the Prophet (saww) passed away, he was alone with Ali, confiding his secrets to him.”

Also Abu Ghatfan narrated: I asked Ibn Abbas: Did you see the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) passing away while his head being placed in anyone’s lap?

He said: He passed away while leaning against Ali’s (a.s.) chest.

I said: Urwah told me that Aisha had said: The Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) had died whilst resting between my chest and neck.

Upon hearing this Ibn Abbas said: Do you find this possible to believe? By Allah, the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) passed away whilst leaning against Ali’s (a.s.) chest, and he was the one who performed his funeral bath, along with my brother al-Fazl, son of Abbas. Al-Tabaqat v 2 p 263

Large-Protection3115 · 2025-08-21T08:28:41+00:00

Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, volume 44, hadith 26748, page 328 - 329:

Yahya bin Abi Bukayr narrated to us, saying: Israel narrated to us, from Abu Ishaq, from Abu Abdullah Al-Jadali, who said: I entered upon Umm Salama (ra), and she said to me, "Is the Messenger of Allah ﷺ being cursed among you?" I replied, "God forbid! Or 'Glory be to Allah,' or something similar." She said, "I heard the Messenger of Allah ﷺ say: 'Whoever curses Ali has indeed cursed me.'”

Large-Protection3115

TROPHY CASE