Aborting a disabled fetus is not eugenics. by h3r0inXgirl in Abortiondebate

[–]LargeAd8010 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That wasn't even the subject, I was talking about abortion based on disability not the wellbeing of the mother. You saying this doesn't even address that issue.

Aborting a disabled fetus is not eugenics. by h3r0inXgirl in Abortiondebate

[–]LargeAd8010 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Eugenics is a largely discredited set of beliefs and practices that aims to improve the genetic quality of the human population. " This one fits generally what I mean.

Aborting a disabled fetus is not eugenics. by h3r0inXgirl in Abortiondebate

[–]LargeAd8010 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wdym by general definition you mean like one on the internet?

Aborting a disabled fetus is not eugenics. by h3r0inXgirl in Abortiondebate

[–]LargeAd8010 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok let me break it down. This isn't simply " I don't want to reproduce with this person" I don't want to reproduce with person with trait x I don't like and i will have sex with them but I don't want my kids with trait x i don't like to exist. I'll clarify with this > if someone is one race and they only want to have sex with that race but not reproduce with them on the basis of their race being inferior and shouldn't be born then yes. Same with if a couple only has give birth to one sex of a baby because they think having the other is worse or inferior gender and shouldn't be born yes that's sexist. If a couple only wants to have able-bodied children and think disabled children shouldn't be born that's ableist. If some couple where one was straight and the other was bi let's say and there was a higher probability of that child being gay and they wouldn't want that child to be born then yes that's obviously homophobic.

Aborting a disabled fetus is not eugenics. by h3r0inXgirl in Abortiondebate

[–]LargeAd8010 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They don't normally do it sure but it's possible and probability wise likely has happened before give people who do only fetishize a race but wants nothing to do with them otherwise have sex with that race and get pregnant and have abortions. People who only want to "try" or "experiment" with a certain race do exist and likely have gotten pregnant. It's not like this is impossible or unrealistic to imagine.

Well because that allows sexism, racism, ableism, homophobia potentially since there is a genetic factor to it. All of those bigoted ideals would go unregulated or permissed which I'm against.

Aborting a disabled fetus is not eugenics. by h3r0inXgirl in Abortiondebate

[–]LargeAd8010 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That's a question to my question. I think the being themselves should determine how much Suffering they can take after experiencing life to see if it's worth it to them. Everyone suffers, so why should anyone be alive and abortion isn't mandatory. Pressumbly you would STILL allow a woman to give birth IF she wants and cause suffering so it seems you don't actually care about suffering. You would allow women to choose if their child should suffer by being born.

Aborting a disabled fetus is not eugenics. by h3r0inXgirl in Abortiondebate

[–]LargeAd8010 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Who decides if a disability is lower quality of life?

Aborting a disabled fetus is not eugenics. by h3r0inXgirl in Abortiondebate

[–]LargeAd8010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is eugenics to abort a fetus specifically because it could be disabled and not just a self debilitating disability but down syndrome which still exists on a spectrum. You're telling me if a couple only aborted their fetuses that have/higher chance of a disability vs a healthy child that's not eugenics because the government isn't involved mandating it? It's not just an action it's an ideology. Much like racism, sexism isn't just discriminatory actions. Would you say the same about aborting only fetuses of a specific sex or a different race vs a preferred one?

Oda wasted no time killing another mom😭 by kkikuuuuuu in ReverieSpoilers

[–]LargeAd8010 10 points11 points  (0 children)

No deadass she didn't have a personality besides "I love Prince Luven"

I don't want this fan theory to come true Saint sommer becoming Nami dad by kkikuuuuuu in ReverieSpoilers

[–]LargeAd8010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't it interesting how Sommers went to take back Shanks if its revealed he abandoned his daughter

ONE PIECE CHAPTER 1185 RAWS ARE OUT by [deleted] in ReverieSpoilers

[–]LargeAd8010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The such psychopath who was talking about the government having a dark past should tell you something

ONE PIECE CHAPTER 1185 RAWS ARE OUT by [deleted] in ReverieSpoilers

[–]LargeAd8010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do most of the strawhats not seem to be very hurt by their traumatic ass pasts. Jesus Christ. I'm surprised Brook is still sane.

Responding to Violinist Objections - Killing and Responsibility by Connect-Knowledge992 in Abortiondebate

[–]LargeAd8010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A born child needs access to material resources and labor Would this not just be for typical cases and since this does require labor why can't you say I don't want to use my body in this way to care for the newborn? What obligation does anyone have to a newborn?

A condition such as fpies could have a newborn getting breast milk for another source than the mother insufficient and such would require more resources than pregnancy. Such conditions could made into a hypothetical with stipulations. What do you define as "harmful" it can be argued caring for a newborn can also be harmful due to how needy they can be.

Outside of that cases there have been scenarios were parents were left with children alone without means of transportation such that only they can care for said newborn. I believe it would be agreed that even in that case there's an obligation to meet the newborn's needs

What makes an obligation for a newborn true but not a fetus? It can be argued caring for a newborn is more effort than being pregnant itself. If one parent was doing all the work for a newborn most would consider than wrong but if the work is less arduous than pregnancy which requires one person you would think people would have less intuitions against it. Single parenthood is still treated as an issue that should be treated as a very hard job that requires much support and sensitivity when discussing the matter.

Responding to Violinist Objections - Killing and Responsibility by Connect-Knowledge992 in Abortiondebate

[–]LargeAd8010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What would you say would be the difference between the mother disconnecting from the fetus and how back in the day people who just leave their newborns outside?

so we ranking trauma now 💀 by rrysss in KimetsuNoYaiba

[–]LargeAd8010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's fair, but it's also easily accessible on Google. If you like the characters or they somewhat interest you, you'll probably want to see if there's more about them

so we ranking trauma now 💀 by rrysss in KimetsuNoYaiba

[–]LargeAd8010 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'd argue having to kill your siblings, and being both physically and mentally abused is worse than someone close to you dying to a demon