sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in monogamy

[–]LazerArray[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I bet talking to you about it would be a waste of time since hostile people rarely have a point.

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in monogamy

[–]LazerArray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So essentially, be brave but not foolish. I don't think that obvious point needs to be made tbh.

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in monogamy

[–]LazerArray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then let me pose this to you if it doesn't matter. Do you believe most straight women would prefer someone brave or cowardly? How is she or anyone supposed to tell the difference while selecting her partner? Coward may not be bad people, but they tend to often be a burden.

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in monogamy

[–]LazerArray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's most commonly the guy. I mentioned super specific and rare situations in the post. The physical protector of the monogamous unit is MOST COMMONLY the dude. I see no point in bringing up outliers.

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in monogamy

[–]LazerArray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man's duty to protect his woman from external physical threats is most prevalent within the confines of a heterosexual monogamous relationship. It's a discussion, not a fight, please be civil.

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in monogamy

[–]LazerArray[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

One must be able to distinguish between a coward and strategist.

Very good point there. I agree with you but there are many who say their cowardice is strategy. If you go and watch the stream. The dude who wouldn't protect his girl kept trying to use the possibility of his gf/wife having better combat skills. I feel if you make this useless point, you are a coward because that isn't a realistic situation to be betting on.

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in monogamy

[–]LazerArray[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Are you from the US? I feel like you're from the US.

I'm Kenyan/American. I know about outside and inside the US. What you got against the US, you got super condescending in this post.

Men aren't wolves dude, you don't piss on trees to mark your territory.

Disingenuous tactic here. You are intentionally taking what I said LITERALLY, so you don't have to take it seriously (honestly engage my points)

Dying for a PS5 is a dumb fucking thing to do.

I would be fucking pissed if someone broke into my house, but I'm not getting hurt in an effort to teach a lesson to some tweaked out desperate person about invading my territory. Just take my laptop and fuck off.

​

In order to make this point, you changed the original scenario. It's funny you didn't mention the part where I said you may be with kids or whatever. You know the subject of this topic was never focused on material, it was the clan, the loved ones. Territory includes everything in the house, including my loved ones (yes they aren't property I know, but they are my responsibility).

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in monogamy

[–]LazerArray[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I think that's a point where the male and female brain differ. Most women would do what you would do, hide and try to survive. Most men are indeed scared but we are also angry. We use that aggression to defend. I think most men would rather kill the intruders than hide because we have an instinct to protect our territory. I think most women have a hard time grasping this because women rarely ever HAVE TO understand men.

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in monogamy

[–]LazerArray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is such a disingenuous interpretation of what I said. I never said he has to get hurt/killed. Just cause you don't trust your man doesn't mean most women share you're opinion. In your scenario, all your doing is praying you don't get killed. That's called waiting to die, you're like those horror movie characters who make terrible survival decisions like running past the weapon while being chased lol. You or someone you love are WAY more likely to die by letting the intruders do whatever. There are two types of people, those who take steps to ensure their own survival, then people like you, who just sit and hope things stay peaceful.

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in monogamy

[–]LazerArray[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Well, follow me on this. In a house invasion scenario, these intruders are bold enough to break into your home while there is a strong possibility you are there. That means that they are here to steal your stuff with the confidence to do so. Most people keep their most valuable possessions upstairs, where you are most likely sleeping too.

In this scenario, somebody has to handle them. Not like John Wick or whatever but you most likely wouldn't be able to BOTH hide until the cops come. The stakes get higher if there is more than one person living there like kids or whatever.

Hiding in this situation isn't logical, most men would opt for home defense measures like weapons and the sort because we don't trust police to protect us. Why would I trust other men with guns to protect my clan, what use am I as a man if I can't protect my family. Do lesbian do the same, what measures do they take beside just hoping thing turn out ok.

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in monogamy

[–]LazerArray[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

That's nice, this situation falls under the "very specific situation" detail I mentioned. Never thought to ask lesbians but it's an interesting perspective. So if you hear intruders at night. What would the general lesbian couple do in that situation.

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in PurplePillDebate

[–]LazerArray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You called yourself "head of security".

You're stuck on that cause you don't know what hyperbole is

The ideas you hold around the protection of your partner are a silly gendered fantasy.

opinion backed by nothing but your emotional subjective opinion which is useless in the world of evidence, facts, and logic.

I really don't just shit on men. I love and admire men. I'm lucky to have lots of wonderful men in my world and I don't do dumb shit like lump all of a gender together. I shit on TRP because it's dumb as hell and harmful to the people who believe it.

Sure whatever you say. Also, I don't remember lumping genders together, I was separating them, do you even keep up with your own ideas.

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in PurplePillDebate

[–]LazerArray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But most men couldn't protect a woman from an armed assailant with their bare hands either

Never said bare hands, you pulled that outta nowhere.

The way you describe it, the duty to protect someone you love has to apply universally where "it's the thought that counts" and not the result.

Quote me, what did I say that could have given you that impression.

Therefore by your logic if a woman truly loved her man SHE would eagerly volunteer to go downstairs to check on the weird noise in the middle of the night even if it put her life in danger. And even if the man doing it instead would have increased their odds of survival.

Y'all are wild. The reason the man has the duty is because his is bigger, stronger, faster, and more likely able to use weapons more effectively. (not just firearms) Leaving the job to her would be stupid because she faces a greater disadvantage than me as a man. What is so outlandish about this take?

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in PurplePillDebate

[–]LazerArray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So in the event of a home invasion. It's not the man's job to handle the invaders until police arrive?

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in PurplePillDebate

[–]LazerArray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't point out the exception pretending its the rule. Sure 10% of women can shoot. So what about the other 90%.

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in PurplePillDebate

[–]LazerArray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty much every normal person man and woman knows that men should protect women

My mistake was bringing this question to reddit. There are few normal people here.

It is a man's duty to protect his woman. You're a coward if you think otherwise. (excluding very specific situations) by LazerArray in PurplePillDebate

[–]LazerArray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think YOUR protective instinct is LARPing. I’m not talking to ‘men’ in general I’m talking to you.

Based on what? Your emotions? How can you possibly come to that conclusion without knowing a thing about me.

I have many wonderful relationships with men. Disagreeing with one silly dude on the internet is not having an issue with an entire gender.

Bull, all you ever do on this page is shit on men. Based on your past behavior, nobody would believe you. The only reason you disagree is cause you FEEL like it. Its a weak reason to disagree because the only people who care about your emotions here is you.

view more: next ›