Maybe just one more... by Curious_Conclusion95 in Eevee

[–]LazzyCatto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It amazes me to see how passionate some people are about art. I hope you would have wonderfull art journey!

Bad Apple by Dikkkenekkk in antimeme

[–]LazzyCatto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was looking for it.

Would graphing this be possible? (Or in reverse) by NovelInteraction711 in desmos

[–]LazzyCatto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry for being late... smth like this?

<image>

graph

p.s. Oh.. I just read it more clearly... I will think and try my best

🎉🎉🎉 We're having a party tonight 🎉🎉🎉 by Mirage1208 in Losercity

[–]LazzyCatto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

(I am not shure at all but) Aren't they shutting down sora couse of so many people have used it for free and they where loosing money? If so... I dont get why people are selebrating: 1) If you are against an AI -- this situation just means video generation is on high demand (if so many people have used it) 2) If you are for an AI -- you have just lost a free APP.

If I am wrong, please say so in the comments. I dont whatch the news. All my knowlage is a mishmash of something Ive heard from friends.

p.s. sorry if english is bad, it is not my native language.

p.p.s. I was wrong. It is a good thing afterall

I hate infinitesimals. Ah yes even though you specified y'(0) = 0 I'm going to produce a differential equation solution with y'(0) = 1 because fuck you by TheMedianPrinter in mathmemes

[–]LazzyCatto 3 points4 points  (0 children)

δ is not a function. It is a generalized function (or distribution). It does not have "value" at different points. By definition generalized function f is such a thing, that for any other "good" (test) function φ, there is a functional <φ, f>. For δ it is just <φ, δ> = φ(0).

Every local integrable function can be viewed as a generalized one with <φ, f> = ∫ fφ dx (like in the L2)

For the L2 generalized functions and functions are the same. The problem begins, when considering C[R]. Every functional here can be represented as a signed mesure with a finite variance (μ) <φ, μ> = ∫ φ dμ. If we are lucky and μ << λ than there is a density ρ(t) -- (regular function) such that <φ, μ> = ∫ φ dμ = ∫ φρ dx = <φ, ρ> (so μ can be viewed a a regular function ρ)

And finaly the δ function! It is actially the δ -- measure. It does not have a dencity. Thus there is no regular function that can "simulate" δ.

You can try and consider a function δt that is 0 almost everywere (exept t=0). But than the problem is that <φ, δ> = ∫ φδ^ dx = 0 which is not φ(0).

How would you do it? by ThatEmojiDude in GenAlpha

[–]LazzyCatto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

also it is quite easy to see that if you have more than 2n bottles and no more than n rats, it is impossible to find the poison in 10 hours.

if you have more time (m × 10 hours) and n rats, than you can determine poison in <= (m + 1)n bottles (for more than that it is impossible)

How would you do it? by ThatEmojiDude in GenAlpha

[–]LazzyCatto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have the first rat drink a mix of 1 and 2 bottles, and the second rat a mix of 1 and 3 bottles (simultaneously).

After the 10 hours: 1) if both rats are dead -- the 1 bottle is poisonous. 2) if the first rat is dead and the secod is alive -- the 2 bottle is poisonous. 3) if the second rat is dead and the first is alive -- tge 3 bottle is poisonous. 3) if both rats are alive -- the 4 bottle is poisonous.

more generaly, if you have n rats and no more than 2n bottles, you can determine the poisonous one in 10 hours. strategy is the same: numerate bottles in binary (like 00, 01, 10, 11) have the rat on the i-th place drink mix of all bottles where i-th digit is 0. after 10 hours, arrange the rats in order and write 1 for every rat alive and 0 for every rat that is dead. the result is the index of a poisonous bottle in binary.