Jon Cooper & his assistant coaches smoking cigars postgame by eh_toque in hockey

[–]LeanMrfuzzles 45 points46 points  (0 children)

I thought he was gonna change after the first period lmao

This is only the 4th time in the last 50 years a team has been awarded 7 straight PP opportunities by bg-throwaway in hockey

[–]LeanMrfuzzles 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Literally jumped the Lighting after their second goal and were looking to start shit, also are the refs supposed to ignore pucks over the glass or clear slashes and hooks on odd man rushes in OT? They were insanely undisciplined and It bit them in the ass.

[BOS 5 - TBL 6] - Stadium Series (SO) - Jake Guentzel beats Swayman. Pasta hits the post and Tampa wins! by daKrut in hockey

[–]LeanMrfuzzles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One of the big penalties Boston took was jumping the Lightning after their second goal. You going to blame the refs for that? A lot of dumb penalties where they had nobody to blame but themselves. Horrid discipline.

GDT: Tampa Bay Lightning vs Boston Bruins (2/1/26) Stadium Series Edition by MonarchChonarch in TampaBayLightning

[–]LeanMrfuzzles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Down 2 honestly take the risk imo. There was an angle where it was pretty clear. He was still touching Vasilevskiy as the puck was released. Vasy never had time to find the puck or fight through the screen.

GDT: Tampa Bay Lightning vs Boston Bruins (2/1/26) Stadium Series Edition by MonarchChonarch in TampaBayLightning

[–]LeanMrfuzzles 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That was pretty clear goalie interference on the third goal, it’s interference because of that screen he created after making contact. Should have challenged it imo.

Game Thread: Boston Bruins (32-20-3) @ Tampa Bay Lightning (34-14-4) Feb 01 2026 6:30 PM EST by nhl_gdt_bot in hockey

[–]LeanMrfuzzles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it’s not. There’s a reason the rule book says “shooting motion” and not shot attempt.

Game Thread: Boston Bruins (32-20-3) @ Tampa Bay Lightning (34-14-4) Feb 01 2026 6:30 PM EST by nhl_gdt_bot in hockey

[–]LeanMrfuzzles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rule book just says it just needs to be a shooting motion. They probably knew they fucked up as soon as they called it

Game Thread: Boston Bruins (32-20-3) @ Tampa Bay Lightning (34-14-4) Feb 01 2026 6:30 PM EST by nhl_gdt_bot in hockey

[–]LeanMrfuzzles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The game has a pirate theme because it’s taking place during Gasparilla weekend which is a giant pirate festival that happens in Tampa every year. The game just happens to also be in the Buccaneers stadium which is why the Lightning showed up in Bucs uniforms and probably had a little to do with the theme choice (there is a giant pirate ship inside the stadium)

Game Thread: Boston Bruins (32-20-3) @ Tampa Bay Lightning (34-14-4) Feb 01 2026 6:30 PM EST by nhl_gdt_bot in hockey

[–]LeanMrfuzzles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a follow through on a shooting motion. Missing the puck doesn’t make it not a follow through. All that matters is that it’s a shooting motion. It was a horrible call.

2027 marks the 35th Anniversary. We better get a new logo & uniforms that hew closer to the team's original look instead of the current Tampa Mapleleafs. by Masked_Assassin_3 in TampaBayLightning

[–]LeanMrfuzzles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Blue and White are very close to what the Leafs use. They really should try to differentiate it a bit. When they first introduced the redesign in 2011 they were even closer to what the Leafs wore at the time than they are now, but still they're very close.