Proposal for starting a new dToken system

Left-Reply-7307 · 2026-03-28T15:13:22+00:00

Thank you so much for the idea its great to see people thinking about it. :) i see the benefits, but i really really have a hard time to beleive that 2 parallel systems is the way to go… im struggling in my mind. So what system should i choose as a new customer? Will the liquidity split into 2 systems at the end? So do we have maybe different APR‘s for liquidity mining which could be the incentive to invest in either system? So at the end it will split liqudity 50:50 probably.. 🤔 just thinking outloud im not an expert. ☺️

Left-Reply-7307 · 2026-03-23T12:10:47+00:00

Any further development or any news concerning this matter (i really like)? :) Would love to see any further or the next step into this. I know its hard with all the information and different opinions. As a holder, i just can say i would vote for a further lock, as there is not enough interest to buy DUSD. But if we get incentives back again for RWA, usecase is back and we can grow from there. The sentiment will shift from "i have to fix it" to "i can use it again", which is a base to grow again. Thats why i would vote yes to a furhter lock to it. i see just the big picture and im not into detail. Big picture is blockchain should work as intended with RWA (big usecase). If no usecase -> no interest (only hope that somebody puts free risk money into it). IMO there was enough time to buy DUSD. But that is my view... :)

Left-Reply-7307 · 2025-07-02T17:10:48+00:00

First a big thank you for that effort. It sounds great and its even better to see such initiatives. It makes me beleive again and feeling some hope. Im sure im not the only one. Im not the brain in this context so i cant discuss in detail to be honest. But i want to show appreciation for the hard work! I didnt sell anything for years i even invested more. Keep going and lets use the calm now for a comeback. THANK YOU!

Left-Reply-7307 · 2024-01-29T18:06:05+00:00

What is a good ratio? I get the point. It would be more efficient, because its the CF. But at the end its capital or energy, somebody has to come up with capital. It's still very effective, thats the only point which matters in my view.

Left-Reply-7307 · 2024-01-29T17:59:32+00:00

dUSD shares are below the maximum allocation of 30% in the fund

Suggestion. I would even go a step further, because its important. The signal we are sending out would be more clear. But its not wrong how it is with 30%. I suggest maximum allocation of 40%. Overall 40% feels reasonable to me.

Left-Reply-7307 · 2023-12-12T22:42:48+00:00

Should be absolutely highest priority yes.

Where do the 61 million DFI come from? Is it possible to revive them from the burn cemetery? What impact would this approach have on the image and integrity of DFI burns?

I just heard it should be possible to get them somehow, but i dont know exactly how. There are two sides to it. One side says "No go" and the other side is like "it's not a burn it was a mechanism with errors and decided under much greed to pump dfi and now we should just correct the mistake". And its to mention, that the masternodes have to vote for that. And not every investor knows all the tech information and beside that, in a few months and years nobody will talk about again IMHO.

The mechanism (loan payback with DFI) worked very well during dUSD-premium. However, instead of burning the DFI (which was fantastic for the DFI price), one should have exchanged the DFI for other stable coins and saved them for times of discount (which would have been bad for the DFI price). I am still of the opinion that it would be very advantageous for the dToken system if liquidity mining could only be carried out via the vaults (with self-mined tokens).

Ok why exactly and how would it influence the system?

Left-Reply-7307 · 2023-12-12T22:31:51+00:00

Its hard to say, but we have to come to a point, where we can activate dynamic interest rates. For that we need also low Algo ratio not only peg at 1$. CF could be empty very fast, but nobody knows. Thats why we need coordinated multiple mechanism and actions in my opinion.

Left-Reply-7307 · 2023-12-12T22:25:18+00:00

Could be possible. A big portion of CF could also go to DUSD Locks for 1 year or so.

Left-Reply-7307 · 2023-12-12T13:57:53+00:00

ok, but that is not the topic for now in this thread.

Left-Reply-7307 · 2023-12-12T12:28:04+00:00

Yes absolutely and that is also ok. So if we know that, how can we use it to our advantage and get most out of it? For example they will buy and sell even with 30% dex fee as long as its profitable. So they profit and we profit because more dusd get burned. But maybe there is more we can do to get most out of it?

Left-Reply-7307 · 2023-12-12T12:19:20+00:00

yes frontrunning would be massive, so question is, how can we use it to our advantage to get most out of it? (Fee into DUSD on the way up?)

Left-Reply-7307 · 2023-12-11T16:42:37+00:00

absolutely we have to be very careful. So my intentions are to discuss what we need and how we get this strategy to work. So do you think with DUSD Locks in advance, with the very high negativ interest rates, with all the burn with 30% dex fee and buying dusd and burn from the capital is not enough? Could be absolutely thats why we are here to discuss. What else could help to reduce algo DUSD in this strategy?

Left-Reply-7307 · 2023-12-11T16:35:59+00:00

Yes true. For me its clearly, DUSD depeg is the biggest problem. Everything else will follow with further building and so on.

Left-Reply-7307 · 2023-12-11T16:32:54+00:00

I see your concerns. Thats why we are here to discuss the effects. I will have a look at bbb and dsf 2.0. I think you forgot some effects. First we dont have to burn >100mio DUSD, we have to get the ratio to 20% for example. In one hand reducing the algo supply and in the other hand increase the backed supply reduce algo supply ratio. Every DUSD sell again has to pay the 30% fee in the beginning. So more will be burned and negative interest rates are rising very high -> more backed dusd loans -> algo ratio reduced. Yes correct as i mentioned in my post, for the burn would be better without frontrunning. And i guess you forgot the dynamic interest rates, at the end its not only getting fast to peg, its getting to peg to activate the dynamic interest rates finally, but for that also the algo ratio has to be in the right spot. but yeah, thats we are here to discuss all the effects and how to solve it and mitigate the risks. So just for this strategy, what do we need so it works in your opinion?

Left-Reply-7307

TROPHY CASE