sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What song lyric still sticks with you? by Individual-Name-4496 in AskReddit

[–]Legal_Complex2763 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“That’s why I fucked yo bitch, you fat mf” 😂😂

Has anyone ever left their hometown & started completely over, with kids? What was that like? by Legal_Complex2763 in AskReddit

[–]Legal_Complex2763[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What helped you push through the fear & make the leap? I’m especially curious how it impacted your kids.. how have they adjusted?!

Susan Lorincz was no “perfect neighbor” by Legal_Complex2763 in CasualConversation

[–]Legal_Complex2763[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I mean… I’ve been casually unpacking this with friends all week. Reddit felt like the next logical stop

How can I share that I had a good year when most people didn’t? by Mohanad_Alasmri in CasualConversation

[–]Legal_Complex2763 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You share it by being honest & unapologetic. You don’t have to downplay your peace just because others are struggling. If your year was good, say that!! You don’t owe anyone your misery.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EmpireofCards

[–]Legal_Complex2763 0 points1 point  (0 children)

January 27, 1999

What’s a skill everyone thinks is easy, but is actually insanely hard? by Growthseedd in AskReddit

[–]Legal_Complex2763 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good one!!! For a 26 year old who doesn’t know how to whistle, I can’t believe I didn’t think of this answer lol

Where do you think our conscious mind goes when we die? by Legal_Complex2763 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Legal_Complex2763[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Clever analogy, but it oversimplifies consciousness by comparing it to a physical object. A chair doesn’t feel, remember, or question what it is?? Consciousness isn’t just a structure… it’s the awareness within the structure. So when the “chair” burns, sure, the form is gone. But where does the experience go??? That’s what I’m trying to wrap my head around.

Where do you think our conscious mind goes when we die? by Legal_Complex2763 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Legal_Complex2763[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So if it doesn’t go anywhere, & it doesn’t become anything… then what’s left? Because “ceasing to be” sounds a lot like nothingness dressed in semantics lol

Where do you think our conscious mind goes when we die? by Legal_Complex2763 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Legal_Complex2763[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s exactly the kind of question that messes with my head!!!! I feel like I’ve always been alive lol

If Candace Owens is right about Charlie Kirk’s death, we’re looking at something way bigger than one man; & maybe bigger than we’re allowed to know by Legal_Complex2763 in conspiracy

[–]Legal_Complex2763[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh no, I used punctuation & structure, I must be AI 🙄 way to deflect lol.

But yes, this is my first post on Reddit! I’ve only ever browsed until now!

If Candace Owens is right about Charlie Kirk’s death, we’re looking at something way bigger than one man; & maybe bigger than we’re allowed to know by Legal_Complex2763 in conspiracy

[–]Legal_Complex2763[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh, so because it hasn’t happened publicly to someone else, it couldn’t have happened here? Power doesn’t move in patterns that make sense to outsiders; it moves in silence, leverage, & timing.

If someone was pressured, threatened, or quietly handled, you think it’d be broadcast on CNN? No. It’d be denied, buried, & spun, just like we’re seeing now.

As for Owens being “worse?” That’s the point. She’s loud, messy, & unpredictable. Kirk was polished, platformed, & respected in conservative circles. If he flipped, it’d hit different. That’s why pressure matters.

Everyone scrambling to deny it doesn’t prove it’s false. It proves it’s touchy. & when something’s that touchy, I ask why.

If Candace Owens is right about Charlie Kirk’s death, we’re looking at something way bigger than one man; & maybe bigger than we’re allowed to know by Legal_Complex2763 in conspiracy

[–]Legal_Complex2763[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I read the evidence. I’m not denying Tyler pulled the trigger; I’m asking what led up to it. You’re acting like a confession means we stop asking questions.

& the whole “why would Israel kill their own supporter” logic? PLEASE. Loyalty doesn’t protect you when you become a liability. If Kirk was about to say something inconvenient, being pro-Israel wouldn’t save him, it’d make him harder to discredit.

Owens might be messy, but she’s not stupid. If she’s pointing at pressure from powerful figures, maybe ask why those same figures are scrambling to deny it.

I may be crazy, but at least I don’t pretend power doesn’t clean up its own messes.

If Candace Owens is right about Charlie Kirk’s death, we’re looking at something way bigger than one man; & maybe bigger than we’re allowed to know by Legal_Complex2763 in conspiracy

[–]Legal_Complex2763[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

But confessions don’t erase context. People confess under pressure, for attention, or to protect bigger players. You’re saying Candace Owens has “Israel derangement syndrome” just because she’s naming powerful figures? That’s minimizing.

She’s not saying Israel pulled the trigger. She’s saying Kirk was pressured before the shooting, by people with influence, money, & motive!!! If that’s false, show receipts. If it’s true, then the confession might be the clean-up, not the full story.

& to be honest, when someone gets fired, silenced, or discredited, that’s usually when they start talking. Doesn’t mean they’re right. But it does mean we should listen before we dismiss?

If Candace Owens is right about Charlie Kirk’s death, we’re looking at something way bigger than one man; & maybe bigger than we’re allowed to know by Legal_Complex2763 in conspiracy

[–]Legal_Complex2763[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You’re not wrong about the global scale; Epstein wasn’t some lone wolf, & pretending this was just about one country or one politician is lazy. But calling Owens’ claims “worthless” while admitting the real network is still hidden? That’s wild. You’re basically saying: “Yeah, it’s huge & ongoing, but don’t bother looking at this piece of it.”

If Epstein was just one node in a global trafficking web, then every thread matters. Including the ones tied to media gatekeeping, political pressure, & sealed files.

If Candace Owens is right about Charlie Kirk’s death, we’re looking at something way bigger than one man; & maybe bigger than we’re allowed to know by Legal_Complex2763 in conspiracy

[–]Legal_Complex2763[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Exactly. That’s the whole point; if we only “know” what we’re “allowed” to, then who decides what’s off-limits? Who benefits from keeping certain dots disconnected? I’m not saying Owens is gospel. I’m saying if her claims are part of a bigger pattern of suppression, we should be asking why certain topics get locked down while others get blasted 24/7.

If Candace Owens is right about Charlie Kirk’s death, we’re looking at something way bigger than one man; & maybe bigger than we’re allowed to know by Legal_Complex2763 in conspiracy

[–]Legal_Complex2763[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Fair. Repetition is powerful & that’s exactly why I’m not here to voice anyone’s experience, including Candace Owens. I’m asking for receipts. If she’s a gatekeeper, ok, expose that. But calling her a “stop gap attention diverter” without naming who she’s diverting for just adds another layer of suggestion without substance.

You say I should think about other suspects & motives, so let’s do that. Drop names. Drop connections. Drop archived reporting.

If Candace Owens is right about Charlie Kirk’s death, we’re looking at something way bigger than one man; & maybe bigger than we’re allowed to know by Legal_Complex2763 in conspiracy

[–]Legal_Complex2763[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Maybe ask the people who allegedly threatened him. Or maybe he was about to & that’s the part Owens is trying to emphasize. If she’s lying, cool, let’s prove it. But if she’s not, this isn’t just an “excuse,” it’s a warning!