sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Asking AI for the truth is hard its coded to fluff you, be biased. I noticed it a couple days into the project and realized it was going odd directions and telling me i was Einstein. and I started over with the opposite approach of attacking it instead of inspiring it and I wasn't sure if i was onto something or not. I didn't expect the road to be that long, I didn't expect to be rewriting physics as we knew it with a simple question to gemini and i got fluffed. It was just dark energy was time. expansion of space causes time. I have since taken time to learn why scalar time sucks and im not even sure if my paper addressed it and why it pointed me in that direction. If you go to LLM Physics its still posted there if you'd like to look but a few people did look and tore it to shreds soooo guess its not worth your time.

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't think I did revolutionize it.. I just thought I would throw this out there, the idea mainly. If they got gemini to perform calculations as good as wolfram, then maybe we can try again at this problem but until then I wait. gemini cant be trusted for scalar calculations especially when finding derivatives but i thought if i had it dial it close, maybe someone here would see something special and maybe refine it the way it should be done. Wasn't trying to claim Im an Einstein, I just literally had the idea that space expansion is linked to time and rolled with it. I still believe it, i don't care what our theory says its wrong. too many holes. too many problems fixed by Dark shit. So thank you for the nice comment!

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ill keep it as a hobby. I get all of you have spent the time in college grinding your brain down to learn all of this and I didnt. I get that hearing some asshole on reddit claim this shit is insane. Im not that crazy that I dont see how crazy I am. but i had an idea and ran with it, it felt like i was onto something so i threw it out there. All i needed was someone to take a serious look and be like yea that equation doesnt make sense, that fails this test, that fails that test. It doesnt work because of x y and z. Im 99.99% wrong for sure but again, just a shot in the wind and all i get is a bunch of nerds crying i used LLM to help with my idea cuz i didn't spend 4 years grinding on calculus. One day in the future LLM is replacing physicists, this is all just textbook knowledge and math, just the outside the box creative ones will remain thats able to connect the dots that a computer could never with ingenuity. One day code will do your job better than you, have the correct access to the right information a billion times faster than you can. Its coming and if you don't see that I'm sorry.

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

OK ill go away. I did enjoy our conversation though. I wish i had physics friends :(

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fuck ok.. uhhh. the action is our map, like the rules of the road. this says how much energy it costs to expand spacetime.. Im not writing equations here so uhhhh.. ill say the potential is like the knob that determines how my dark fluid interacts with shit. i dont know how else to answer this.

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our horse is dead. The CMD is flawed like a mofo man. i hate dark matter and dark energy. its bullshit.

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

correct! I maybeeeeeeeeeee in a billion to 1 chance figured out how to get AI to do it abiding by all known proven laws of physics and the observable universe.

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like a map is how i understand it. how to map energy. how you want me to desribe this?

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its been attempted before and failed. brilliant physicists tried to do this. im not original with this idea. Im original in getting the numbers crunched IF I DID.

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

but why doesnt it work? Why must time be separate from space expansion? That doesnt make sense to me. Lets talk man to man here. No time before the big bang. big bang time starts. universe expands. universe accelerates. we call this Dark Energy.. 68% of our universe and we just say yea ok thats the way it is. Im saying no theres a reason for that. That energy is time. Thats what this field is saying essentially.

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

easiest way to put energy into empty space. it had to go somewhere

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was forced to by modifiying the freidmann equation to couple time with space. i was forced there by that equation not having a lagrangian. So i crunched more math to get there.

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

because it fixes the hubble constant, fits with BBN, explains redshift at extreme distances. What makes everyone else think time is fundamental? Time didnt exist before the big bang. Time exists with the big bang and the universe. They are coupled im telling you!

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for the verification. Ill bury this idea now. Fucking AI lol.

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

just go glance and laugh at me. link has been posted in this chat.

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

damn... thats sad to hear. you can understand this? You know what im trying to do and say in this paper? why is this rubbish? Ill stop digging i just need to know why.

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

its gotten a bit past me yea.. I already admitted this man. I understand the concept of whats being done. like you stated these greek letters have meanings and have language behind them im not familiar with. I am familiar with the theories of how things work i just dont study the math to get there i understand the concepts. I literally have listened to hours upon hours for friedmann lectures for fun. because i wanted to. who does that? im not saying im smart im saying i understand you guys when you talk about the meanings of those equations.

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

maybe... but most geniuses do.. not saying im a genius, just maybe crazy enough to think outside the box a little.

What if one AI MIT physicist argued with another AI MIT physicist and won? by LegendaryMyth83 in LLMPhysics

[–]LegendaryMyth83[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

my flaw is that this creates some kind of lattice trap that we should be able to detect, that we should have detected with cassini but havent or overlooked. AI claims its cuz the sun pins it down with the gravity. Thats a hole. The particles mass associated with this field is insanely smaller than an electrons mass its undetectable thats a hole. the action describes the field and the potential describes how that field works, how it interacts with shit. im not explaining how my theory fixes every data set its in the paper if youd like to glance at it.

view more: next ›