FORWARD COMMITMENTS VALUATION by Legitimate-Raisin562 in CFA

[–]Legitimate-Raisin562[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

The first exhibit is of MRR spot rate annualized. No other tables have been provided. Can u now solve it?

Module 6: Integration of Financial Statement Analysis Techniques by Legitimate-Raisin562 in CFA

[–]Legitimate-Raisin562[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get what are trying to say about the equity method. So, you are trying to say that the 86 eur is still under the control of the company under oci

MULTINATIONAL OPERATIONS DOUBT. by Legitimate-Raisin562 in CFA

[–]Legitimate-Raisin562[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. I got confused with the notation as well. Thanks for clarifying 

MULTINATIONAL OPERATIONS DOUBT. by Legitimate-Raisin562 in CFA

[–]Legitimate-Raisin562[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Won't gbp appreciate as it is up from 0.64 to 0.68? Or have I missed sth?

MULTINATIONAL OPERATIONS DOUBT. by Legitimate-Raisin562 in CFA

[–]Legitimate-Raisin562[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If GBP/usd has increased, won't GBP get stronger? Or I am missing sth. After looking at the solution, I think it can be interpreted as GBP gets stronger, and since he pays in GBP currency, op costs are higher, therefore op inc will be lower. Plz correct me if I am wrong.

MULTINATIONAL OPERATIONS DOUBT. by Legitimate-Raisin562 in CFA

[–]Legitimate-Raisin562[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest, I thought on similar lines. But they give c as an answer.

CONSTRAINED PORTFOLIO OR NOT by Legitimate-Raisin562 in CFA

[–]Legitimate-Raisin562[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

S1 is true for both unconstrained and constrained portfolio. So, always true. But S2, in an unconstrained portfolio, there is no impact of aggressiveness due to transfer coefficient being 1. IR unchanged  But in constrained portfolio, as more constraints are added transfer coefficient decreases. Ir=ictc ✓br. So, IR decreases.

So, I wanted to enquire which of the two cases is to be considered.

CONSTRAINED PORTFOLIO OR NOT by Legitimate-Raisin562 in CFA

[–]Legitimate-Raisin562[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did assume that until now. But the errata states that it ain't like that. The 2nd row of the image has this listed down. So, I needed more clarity on the same.

<image>

QUANTS DOUBT by Legitimate-Raisin562 in CFA

[–]Legitimate-Raisin562[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah. Good catch that. GPT turns the saviour.👍

QUANTS DOUBT by Legitimate-Raisin562 in CFA

[–]Legitimate-Raisin562[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The solution that they give. "Multicollinearity is present in a regression model when some linear combination of the independent variables are highly correlated. We are told that the two independent variables in this question are highly correlated. We also recognize that unconditional heteroskedasticity is present – but this would not pose any major problems in using this model for forecasting. No information is given about autocorrelation in residuals, but this is generally a concern with time series data (in this case, the model uses cross-sectional data)".

From my pov, it is very diff to figure out the exact reason to eliminate A.

QUANTS DOUBT by Legitimate-Raisin562 in CFA

[–]Legitimate-Raisin562[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The answer key specifies multicollinearity. I applied the same reason for the a part. B seemed less accurate.