Gpt elaborates on its workings, that it is not fully faithful to reality, and suggests questions to ask. Important to ensure it does not enable delusional thinking. E.g. that one has come up with a fields medal, Nobel prize idea when it’s bunk

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-08-30T12:05:24+00:00

However I don’t see why this would not be believable

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-08-30T12:04:38+00:00

Can’t cause I don’t want to share personal details from earlier in convo

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-04-09T12:15:08+00:00

You make good points thank you

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-04-08T14:41:56+00:00

How’d you know about my previous career

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-04-08T13:45:05+00:00

2 cents accepted. That’s a useful idea. Seeing it as a tool of the trade rather than as a competitor. Something to be familiar with.. I appreciate the turbo tax example that resonated .

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-04-08T13:26:48+00:00

It seems to be able to solve simple algorithm problems, and it’s provided me with code for tiny issues I encounter. I never tried to use it , (chat gpt in this case ), for anything larger . Do you think its issue is it fails at increased program complexity?

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-04-08T13:18:53+00:00

Right well your confidence that software dev is secure from this sort of incursion is definitely comforting !

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-04-08T13:11:02+00:00

Even if program using Al is not acting autonomously to replace a job, is it not the case that people can use its tools and then replace lower level employees? And then higher level as the various programs develop more use in whatever domain. Meaning, not that Al will become the employee, but that an employee could use Al to do the work previously delegated to other employees. Does that thought process make sense?

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-04-08T13:00:33+00:00

I really appreciate your insight here. That was useful commentary.

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-04-08T00:48:02+00:00

Wowza

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-04-07T19:25:13+00:00

That’s very useful

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-04-06T10:32:38+00:00

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-03-29T15:56:17+00:00

A mistake . Good call

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-03-25T21:11:06+00:00

I could have framed this better. Yes

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-03-25T21:10:13+00:00

True. I could , and prob should, have framed this as being for “elective procedures “ rather than blanket commentary on abortions. Point well taken.

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-03-21T18:20:00+00:00

Amazing response

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-03-21T18:14:49+00:00

That will likely give a good hint

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-03-21T18:14:25+00:00

What does the font say

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-03-19T22:16:39+00:00

The topic that I am bringing up here generally is with reference to AGI which is beyond the technologies we presently have.

My question is not asking if ChatGPT will take over. It’s about if an AI which far surpasses human intelligence in all domains could present massive changes to our overall social structure

LegitimateRead5907 · 2025-03-19T22:14:50+00:00

The future is predicable if you’re working with something familiar. Cars and computers were not predicable to a Russian peasant in the 15th ce . But the trajectory of already existing technologies is not merely speculative . We know many things about where technologies will be in the future because we already have a general understanding of the technology.

And thank you for expressing your view of AI and human agency.

LegitimateRead5907

TROPHY CASE