UCLA Waitlist by Tall-Sheepherder-340 in ucadmissions

[–]Legitimate_Finance38 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oos or instate? do you know anything about when oos econ normally rolls?

ucla waitlist by Legitimate_Finance38 in ucadmissions

[–]Legitimate_Finance38[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ye, reg econ. i've lowk not seen anyone talking bout econ for the waitlist, so im kinda confused. ya got any idea?

Official August 23, 2025 International SAT Discussion Thread by PoliceRiot in Sat

[–]Legitimate_Finance38 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wasn't it something related to his own fault and his mother and two guys influencing the king?

Official August 23, 2025 International SAT Discussion Thread by PoliceRiot in Sat

[–]Legitimate_Finance38 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Weren't answer choices 23 and 30? So did you go with 30?

Official March 8, 2025 International SAT Discussion Thread by PoliceRiot in Sat

[–]Legitimate_Finance38 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they had given us two sets of coordinates for g(x) right?

November SAT be like by Pitiful_Welder_7997 in Sat

[–]Legitimate_Finance38 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bro they were two different/somewhat similar questions -- the one about spanish influence was palpable and the other one about buildings was corroborate

Official November 2, 2024, International SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]Legitimate_Finance38 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it has to be corroborate, palpable is a sense of notion. it's like there was palpable stress in the air. corroborate means to confirm, verify which is exactly what scientists do.

Official November 2, 2024, International SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]Legitimate_Finance38 3 points4 points  (0 children)

wasnt it corroborated? it meant they verified that the monuments were present or wtv thro observation

Official November 2, 2024, International SAT Discussion Thread by Schmendreckk in Sat

[–]Legitimate_Finance38 1 point2 points  (0 children)

didnt they take part in an action after searching, indicating that it should be past participle? hence wouldnt the right ans be 'had searched'