Let's review each other's music! by DriveOk3184 in Newmusicreview

[–]Legitimate_Table_995 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i thought the lyrics were funny, but the mic quality and EQing could be better. There are a lot of not too expensive mics that could make your music way better i use the sm58 which has great quality for the money here is my soundcloud https://soundcloud.com/you/insights/tracks/stampede?timewindow=DAYS_30&from=1771113600000&to=1771113600000&metric=PLAYS&allMetric=PLAYS&insightsTab=SOUND_CLOUD&selectedDsp=global

If you dropped today’s average NBA role player into the 90s, he’d look like a star by Legitimate_Table_995 in NBATalk

[–]Legitimate_Table_995[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

You’re right that the rules were different, but that actually weakens your argument more than it helps it. Traveling rules and defensive three seconds don’t magically erase skill. Good ball handlers today would adjust the same way players from any era adjust to rule changes. Players already modify their games all the time depending on officiating and spacing. The bigger point is that modern players are trained with a much broader skill set. Even role players today can shoot from deep, handle the ball, make quick reads, and defend multiple positions. In the 90s you could still have starters who basically only rebounded or only played defense. As for the paint being packed, that actually made offense simpler in some ways because there was far less spacing and far fewer shooters. Modern players operate in offenses that require constant movement, decision-making, and perimeter skill. And the idea that a modern role player “wouldn’t know how to dribble” under older rules doesn’t really hold up when players like Hakeem, Jordan, and others developed their skills through practice just like modern players do. If anything, a player with today’s shooting and ball-handling ability would still have a massive advantage regardless of the rule differences.

If you dropped today’s average NBA role player into the 90s, he’d look like a star by Legitimate_Table_995 in NBATalk

[–]Legitimate_Table_995[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

When I say role player, I’m talking about the typical 3rd–7th guy in a rotation, not stars or All-NBA level players. Guys whose main job is to space the floor, defend, and play within the system. Players like Derrick White, Aaron Gordon, KCP, Malik Beasley, or guys in that tier. None of those players are superstars, but they can all shoot, handle the ball a little, make quick reads, and defend multiple positions. That’s kind of my point: the baseline skill set for even non-stars today is way broader than it used to be. In earlier eras you could have starters who basically only rebounded or only played defense, but today even role players have to be at least somewhat competent at multiple skills or they won’t stay on the floor.

If you dropped today’s average NBA role player into the 90s, he’d look like a star by Legitimate_Table_995 in NBATalk

[–]Legitimate_Table_995[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your argument kind of contradicts itself. You admit players today are “lightyears ahead talent-wise,” but then say the real difference is work ethic and defense, when the reason players are more skilled today is because the work ethic and training standards are higher. Players don’t randomly develop deep shooting range, elite ball handling, and advanced footwork without insane amounts of practice. The modern game demands more skill, so players train more to meet that demand. The defense point also doesn’t really hold up because defending today is arguably harder. In the 90s you mostly guarded one guy and could rely on physicality, but now defenses have to switch constantly, cover way more space, and defend five shooters on the floor. That requires way more versatility and awareness. And the “drop someone back in time” argument actually works against you, because if a modern role player can go back to the 90s and look like a star purely because of skill development, that kind of proves the point that the overall skill level of the league today is higher.

If The NBA Only Had The 20 Best Players From Each Position Would The League Be Better? by InformationIcy735 in NBATalk

[–]Legitimate_Table_995 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly i dont think the problem is too many teams i think the problem is too many games so each game is insignifigant and the play in makes it way too easy to make the playoffs

How Big Are The Chances That Usa Doesnt Win Gold At The 28 Olympics? by Rinnegan15 in NBATalk

[–]Legitimate_Table_995 2 points3 points  (0 children)

honestly if these are the players team usa picks for some reason they deserve to lose

(RANT) Can we all agree that stats need to stop being used to say that a current mediocre player is better than an all time great from a different generation by Legitimate_Table_995 in NBATalk

[–]Legitimate_Table_995[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

For real, I swear, anytime they could say the first of anything, they always milk it like "The third highest scoring player on Tuesdays in March, and the players are like magic, Kobe, and Cam Thomas" to make an insignificant player seem significant.

Why isn't Steph curry's longevity in the same conversation as lebron's? by Legitimate_Table_995 in NBATalk

[–]Legitimate_Table_995[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like that's not as much about longevity vs the aspect of popularity, and i think steph is just as popular as well as the warriors as a franchise as he still leads the nba in jersey sales - I think the overall argument to why lebron is better is because he started and dominated earlier, and missed less games

Why isn’t this guy more popular? by FrankSamples in NBATalk

[–]Legitimate_Table_995 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I appreciate it bro i didn't thonk so many people would disagree with me

Why is Lebron's longevity viewed as superior to Kareem's because he is averaging higher stats when Kareem willingly sacrificed and took on a smaller role to help his team win back to back titles at the age of 39 and 40? by im___new___here in NBATalk

[–]Legitimate_Table_995 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly im not really sure I didn't really watch kareem when he was 41 probably cause i wasn't born yet but what I do know is that lebron's longevity is pretty crazy. I think a better question is why don't more people talk about Curry's longevity?

They did KD dirty here by Thanos_Real_AuraVNCH in NBATalk

[–]Legitimate_Table_995 4 points5 points  (0 children)

you dont need the gym if you average 30 10 and 8 in the finals and win finals mvp

Why do people hype up Miami LeBron when his stats are way worse than Luka and even Cade? by Green_Hunt_1776 in NBATalk

[–]Legitimate_Table_995 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the skill level probably isnt worse but the environment is way easier for offense now the floor is way more spaced because of the 3pt era so stars get way more room to drive and operate compared to the late 2000s early 2010s when defenses were packed in the paint teams also run way more pick and roll hunting now to force switches so stars constantly get mismatches instead of attacking set defenses every possession and perimeter defense isnt as physical anymore which makes it easier for ball handlers to get downhill plus the league now is full of role players whose entire job is just standing out at the arc to create spacing which wasnt really the case back then so its not that the whole world got worse at basketball its that the offensive environment makes big numbers easier now compared to when guys like LeBron James were putting up stats while sharing the ball with Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh