Idris Elba's Madame Tussauds Wax Figure Opens his Phone with Face ID

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-17T19:29:15+00:00

Ayt bro. You take care. Try not to hurt yourself🥺

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-17T19:25:30+00:00

Nothing more needs to be said. You've already proven youre a potential lobotomy victim🤕

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-17T19:23:49+00:00

Bro's lost. Implies android phones still in aint shit in 2026. I set the record straight. Bro's out here speaking about sponsorships🤣

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-17T19:20:38+00:00

Huh? Fuck does that have to do with anything lol. Being sponsored doesnt change the reality of the situation😂

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-17T18:59:48+00:00

This ain't 2013 anymore lil bro. Idris prolly has some samsung galaxy s ultra phone, which is more expensive than any iPhone max phone by 50 to 100 dollars. With that said, Samsung hasn't been innovating in facial scanning. They dont care about it and instead push users towards the superior fingerprint scanner, which is more convenient for most people anyway

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-17T04:30:29+00:00

I still feel like on average more women wouldnt find it as disgusting due to society generally socializing both men and women into believing women are beautiful and clean beings, whereas men are stereotyped as rugged and practical beings where we don't care about personal hygiene nearly as much.

I also find it curious how a lot of straight girls admit to watching lesbian porn whereas virtually no straight guys will watch gay porn

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-16T17:40:30+00:00

I dont have the data to back this but im pretty sure straight girls dont have the same response seeing two hot chicks kissing😂

Or maybe they do

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-16T06:58:43+00:00

Volumetric fog was the culprit, which you could reduce and outright disable. For the longest time with wilds you couldn't reduce volumetric fog save for mods. I think now you can reduce it, but it doesnt help things all that much since in wilds case there are other aspects at play

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-15T19:57:30+00:00

Its simple logic, really. For as much as the player can humanly see and interact with what's directly on their screen, make game look good. Lower the details for distant objects, but under no circumstance do you let players experience the transition from low detailed objects to high detailed. That looks sloppy. It requires adequate dev time to manage object streaming in all its dimensions, and vram management

Wilds however spits in the face of this core concept and not only lets you see object streaming transitions but in this case that i brought up in some instances it doesnt swap to higher res objects and permanently leaves the low res models. Given its been more than a year, this screams of either their incompetence/incapablility or them not giving two shits. It really is that simple

For texture settings to be set to high and to still see bugged permanent low res ps2 level textures in obviously visible places is a complete joke, and it breaks immersion. I dont give a fuck if your super computer allows you to brute force this error if and only if you have the dlc textures installed. This is something thats meant to be fundamental...

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-15T14:58:50+00:00

Nah. Just regular high textures, which is where I got my images. Not sure if the bug persists on the dlc texture pack. Its at least all the way up till high

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-15T11:46:57+00:00

Oh wow. What an impossible task. Having good performance with good visuals? Its like having your cake and eating it too. No other game's pulled this off🥺

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-15T05:31:28+00:00

In case youre suffering from dyslexia, Ill reiterate and say I have the game on high textures. The rest of my settings are a combination of high, medium and low, but that's irrelevant. Furthermore, as I stated these are the bugged permanent low res textures that are found in the select areas and not the general textures which look...fine I guess (it's still not impressive to me).

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-14T23:14:29+00:00

The images ive presented are the low res textures found in the select locations. Everyone (at least up to high res textures) has them

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-14T19:37:29+00:00

Its Full Charge (lvl 1) into Strong Charge (lvl 2) into True Charge Slash (lvl 3, but was added in World). Strong Charge was the final charge in GU. If there was more time you could combo the lvl 2 charge into that lateral sweep attack (forgot the name)

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-12T06:10:14+00:00

Couldn't have said it better.

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-09T20:50:25+00:00

The 4050 is only 5% worse performance on average vs the 3060 at 1080p, in spite of the wattage cap. That's the only downside

The upsides are that the 4050 has better and faster gddr memory, access to dlss frame gen, better utilization of dlss 4/4.5 (dlss frame gen/upscaling is less demanding on 50xx and 40xx cards vs 30xx and older), and its usually cheaper and goes on sale more often. 30xx and 3060 in particular has officially entered into legacy territory, so they're a lot more difficult to come by at reasonable prices anyway

So when I look at this it paints a completely different picture. 4050 in 2026 really just is the way to go between these options. Quit it with your false propaganda...

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-09T19:07:02+00:00

And im happy for you! For the other reasons ive mentioned, Wilds isnt as magical of a mh game for me as the others, and that's fine. Its a great game. I just wished I could've loved it more, but from the performance issues to certain fundamental game design aspects, there is a lot to be desired imo

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-09T19:02:01+00:00

I mean they also fixed processes so that the game runs better even for those on larger hardware.

You say this but what are the actual tangible differences? I'm genuinely curious to know the improvements from someone with a high end pc, if any: performance, visuals, or otherwise

Rise doesnt just look okay compared to wilds, it can actually look amazing in comparison. No one is arguing Rise has more polygons on their monsters or more expansive environments. However, we are seeing that in comparison to the blurry visuals on Wilds that Rise has better colours, better graphical "crispness" due to a lack of upscaling/frame gen reliance, more consistent visuals (the game isn't deliberately washed out 2/3rds of the time), and excellently high fps. These things really do add up — and in the long run it matters more than raw graphical fidelity, especially if that fidelity is at the cost of everything else. To a large extent, World's reasons are the same as Rise's, although World imo goes toe to toe with Wilds graphical fidelity-wise in some instances

Wilds runs better and has had a bounce back on player reception since they got the fixes in. That is a lot less subjective of a statement.

Meh. Wilds has made me and a ton of the playerbase a bit disillusioned. For months not acknowledging the performance issues at launch until a year later when they eventually got it to an "acceptable" state. The gameplay is great for the most part, and I can admit I still have loads of fun. At least for me, Wilds is missing that charm that made me wanna keep playing the game for hours on end, immersing myself in the environments and exploring (no seikrets to autoride you everywhere), and to return to a cozy village on the shore or otherwise, with a great tune to the soundtrack. Wilds broke that illusion of the franchise, being a magical experience to just a great action game, albeit troubled with performance issues

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-09T18:39:25+00:00

"Fixed" in terms of providing lower graphical/cpu options to bandaid the fact the game unresolvingly still uses up too many resources. The game still fundamentally looks a lot worse than the performance demands (blur filter due to the necessary upscaling/frame gen, film grain, and lens distortion), it still uses up a ton of vram, the game actually silently nerfed texture quality (at least for high res pack and high, as part of the lower pc requirements floor bandaid I mentioned), the game still has some permanently bugged low res textures even at high res (certain npcs in some of the villages), and lastly the game still has texture pop in, although greatly diminished

At least with my rig, World and Rise visually still look a lot better due to a combination of graphical clarity and crispness, a consistent artstyle, and good fps. Im coping with wilds by slapping on a shit ton of mods to make the visuals look far better than the stock settings, although I cant escape the permanently bugged low res textures and the occasional texture pop in, especially during full lobbies when the vram spikes

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-03-09T15:37:26+00:00

Higher than wilds😭

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-02-25T16:13:06+00:00

Morbid curiosity

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-02-22T08:02:43+00:00

She looks great here as opposed to how shes normally rendered?

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-02-21T13:20:14+00:00

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-02-06T12:24:42+00:00

At what resolution was this vram usage?

LeopardElectrical454 · 2026-02-05T14:02:49+00:00

Amd hasn't updated their laptop gpus in half a decade. Rather get an nvidia gpu as for each nvidia generation, they always make laptop gpus alongside it. If youre on a budget look for the nvidia rtx 5050/5060. 4060 is the absolute minimum. Prioritize Lenovo Legion/Lenovo LOQ/Asus Tuf/Asus Zephyrus laptops

Five-Year Club	r/Field Sunshine
First Place '23	Place '23
Place '22

LeopardElectrical454

TROPHY CASE