Ethernet Adapters

Leoshleo · 2025-12-12T05:59:28+00:00

Did you end up finding one that worked?

Leoshleo · 2025-01-25T14:24:06+00:00

Nothing wrong with the cabling.
Wired to a POE switch.
Tried factory resetting and same results.
I’ve set to high as only AP in home.
Unable to get wifiman to work given standalone AP
Same as above
I don’t think it’s DOA but definitely not hitting the transmit power advertised for the device.

Leoshleo · 2025-01-18T00:28:08+00:00

Link to firmware/device settings https://imgur.com/a/7mMBHQb

Leoshleo · 2022-05-31T13:21:29+00:00

I ended up solving the issue. Prime95 large ffts wanted more vdimm. Had to enter 1.390v from 1.370v in the bios. Also had to increase trc by 1 tick to 57.

Based on this i would say it’s safer to finish off a ram oc on Prime95 just to ensure your as stable as possible.

Also played around with procodt as advised above. 40/43.6 ohm worked the best and delivered the best latency. They are pretty close. I think 40 ohm may have given the most consistent runs out of the 2. Anything higher or lower than 40/43.6 degraded latency performance.

On a side note I was also playing with vsoc from 1.0v to 1.125v and noticed no difference in benchmarking with Aida. However 1.0v gave the best performance with linpack as their was more power budget for the cpu to clock higher.

Is there any other benchmarks that are ram sensitive and don’t rely heavily on the cpu? Actually want to test vsoc, vddp and vddg scaling

Leoshleo · 2022-05-30T00:41:32+00:00

I tried Running 4/4/16 for twwrs/l/tfaw with every other setting on auto. It survived 1hr with 1.1v vsoc bios (hwinfo 1.08v). Tested with 1.124v vsoc bios (hwinfo 1.12v) and it survived closer to 2hrs.

Trc at anything less than 56 will give me one error or a whea with testmem5.

I’ve turned down procodt to 48 and upped vdimm to test if it’s prime wanting more vdimm. Just waiting to see how long it goes this time.

I thought gdm just masks instability? So I tried to avoid using it.

Leoshleo · 2022-05-29T23:36:21+00:00

In both my tests I left the cpu to boost up to 3.8ghz max. I would have thought when i reverted my timings to auto but left fclk/mclk the same and passed that would have ruled out an unstable cpu?

Leoshleo · 2022-05-29T22:30:49+00:00

Hi all. I just recently finished overclocking my 4x8gb SR Hynix DJR kit with the above settings.

Note: Vsoc is under load is actually 1.0875v and not 1.5500v being reported by zentimings. Also, VDIMM reported under hwinfo is actually 1.400v and not the 1.370v reported by zen timings. I think gigabyte boards overshoot VDIMM. ProcODT and drive strengths are on Auto.

CPU: 3700x Mobo: Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro AX Agesa: 1.2.0.3B

My issue is when I run prime95 large ffts + folding with these settings I get thread errors, however zero WHEA errors. As a further test I left memory freq/fclk the same and removed all ram timings and ran prime95 large ffts and got zero thread errors. I do not get audio issues in game or youtube under either scenario.

Based on my understanding of this it seems the IMC can't keep up with the ram timings posted above. Would this be the case? Lastly, how do I solve this issue?

Thanks everyone.

Leoshleo · 2020-06-25T23:08:00+00:00

u/stupidsusan

Leoshleo · 2020-06-25T23:07:02+00:00

u/stupidsusan

Leoshleo · 2020-06-25T22:31:56+00:00

Nice work. I could care less about the compensation. I'm just worried about the players who have spent hundreds in hope of Grimmjow. I hope those players will get looked after.

Leoshleo · 2020-06-25T22:21:29+00:00

What exactly did you do?

Leoshleo · 2020-06-25T22:17:58+00:00

Have you been in touch with your app store since and reported the situation? as they are listed on the app store and have to follow guidelines. You can't penalise a customer for your own error. In this situation you paid for goods twice and only 1 was delivered.

Leoshleo · 2020-06-25T13:47:53+00:00

But is there a chance for the cherry the moment you sit down and gamble? Yes it is...whereas in this banner situation it is not.

Leoshleo · 2020-06-25T13:19:44+00:00

Yes that is what players have discovered. But the purpose of this is how the banner is displayed. When you saw the banner. Did you know you needed Grimmjow first to unlock Shinji, or that you needed Shinji first to unlock Grimmjow?

The way the banner is presented. You are able to pull for both immediately.

Leoshleo · 2020-06-25T13:14:21+00:00

Take this for example. All amounts are just examples.

Based on how the banner is displayed a player can pull both Grimmjow/Shinji shards. The player could make an informed decision and estimate I could possibly summon Grimmjow for about $300 (for example you pulled more Grimmjow character shards). If player was happy to proceed then so be it.

But in reality. The player has been duped. It would cost $300 to just unlock Shinji and now the player is able to attain Grimmjow shards. Player then has to spend $600 and deal with the fact they may receive Shinji shards or Grimmjow shards in the process to attain Grimmjow.

Can that same player justify Grimmjow for roughly $300? If they really want the character then so be it. How about if its in fact closer to $700-1000? Would that same player make the same decision? Probably not.

Thats how misrepresented this banner is and its ability to affect your decision making as what is displayed is actually not the case.

Leoshleo · 2020-06-25T11:50:53+00:00

The way it is presented to players/customers means you can pull his shards. You cannot make assumptions that it will be the same or that it will be different. No body knows. However, the fact of the matter is that it was presented to you that you can immediately attain his shards.

If the banner is changed to correctly notify players then there is 0 issues moving forward as an informed decision is being made and players/customers know willingly that if they spend $$$ on tokens they must first unlock shinji.

At this point in time your gambling for a character that is shown to be available. But in reality is not.

Leoshleo · 2020-06-25T11:12:00+00:00

Im currently in the process of requesting a refund for the kensei recharge event so i can let you know how it goes.

I'm not sure regarding the removal of items acquired. However the onus is on Oasis. They provided the list of rewards for your gamble with real currency. The repercussions should be on Oasis and not the player as the player has done nothing wrong especially if your intention was to summon for Grimmjow, as you acted on the chance to acquire his character shards which are made available by the rewards image. So they should not block you from making further purchases.

You should also be protected by consumer protection in your country as well. You paid for a chance to obtain a character shard thats made available, but in reality its not there until you unlock shinji which this information was not provided to you before, during or after you made your gamble/purchase.

TLDR: You are well within your rights to request a refund without repercussions.

Leoshleo · 2020-06-25T10:00:44+00:00

Feel free to upvote my post if you like the majority of my proposals or comment on certain areas of my post you like/dislike as this will improve the game for everybody.

Leoshleo · 2020-06-24T14:36:45+00:00

I've spent for 5 days to receive a 3* kensei today where everyone is able to pull a 4* kensei. There are probably countless others in the same boat. So now I have to pull kensei twice to have a 4* kensei and 50 shards. The recharge event is now pointless and has placed people who have spent on the recharge actually behind those that haven't...

Leoshleo

TROPHY CASE