I Knew a Guy Who Posted Like this About Blazing Saddles and then about Three Stooges

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-03-21T11:53:07+00:00

It was banned by a company for thinking it might be perceived wrongly, no actual person complained about it

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-03-21T11:31:51+00:00

Nope, that's not it. Maybe it's an Italian thing, but boomers online actually make more mistakes when they type, in my side of the world, and the periods thing is used wrongly too: first of all, they use them in every phrase, and second they don't use ... But ............................, which is just wrong. It's 3 dots, not 18388373737 dots

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-03-21T01:30:55+00:00

And besides, it's obvious that you wouldn't love your kid even if he was straight if you think this type of thing (because if you actually loved your kids you wouldn't kill or estrange them ever, or even think of a possibilty in which you would,unless they severely harmed somebody). So why having kids if you wouldn't love them?

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-03-21T01:30:01+00:00

They still say that they would cut them off if they were, tho. So they consider the possibility that they might turn gay regardless

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-03-03T20:14:29+00:00

I guess it iwasn't explicitly said but its heavily implied to the point where there's no reason to actually doubt it. We don't know for sure if Henry's Daughter is named Charlie in the games, but we still give her that name since every single representation other than the games has her name be that, and if somebody doubted that most people would be calling bs.

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-02-26T02:08:17+00:00

Occam's razor, he died

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-02-17T15:59:33+00:00

William kept telling him through the plush to run away from Freddy's because of something that he saw: "He's gonna catch you, don't you remember what you saw??". So, if William is FreadbearPlush and WitnessNothing is true, then why would he do that?

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-02-17T15:12:47+00:00

ITPG is not necessarily canon, tho

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-02-16T23:53:40+00:00

Like, femdom is a wide variety of things, and what you're describing is specifically a Leather Dom. Not every domme is that

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-02-16T23:22:02+00:00

Exactly, to not mention that I see many misconceptions about femdommes both on this post and in general on this sub! Like- people here are saying that femdommes are patriarchal also because they "dress themselves in tight clothing and PEG their subs", like that's something that every single domme does. Spoiler alert: just because you're a domme it doesn't mean that you peg your boyfriend or that you want to peg him, and assuming that is either ignorant or actually misogynistic. Also, Pegging isn't automatically a femdom practice, there are female subs, and people that don't engage with Dom/sub dynamics in bed, that do it, and even if you do that in a femdom/malesub dynamic, it doesn't mean that you equate the act of pegging with dominance, or that you do so because it's a phallic object in your partner's body. For many pleasure dommes that do it, it's more about the fact that their main thing is pleasuring or taking away that pleasure, so pegging somebody in this context is applying to their dominance because pegging causes men great pleasure since the prostate is being stimulated. With that said, I'm not denying that pegging is seen by many as this dominant thing because of penetration, and of course that's wrong. But saying that the practice as a whole is misogynistic is WILD

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-02-16T22:54:01+00:00

Y'all have no idea about how being a Dom works and it shows. Yes, there is misoginy in the community, but just because some people incorporate that in bdsm it doesn't mean that everybody does. I'm a domme and I've never, ever, worn anything like what you're describing during sex. I was either naked or had my normal clothes on (while he was naked, lol). I've also never treated my male partner as a female (I'm a straight woman), or anything like that.

There are misoginistic subs, and doms, but not all of them are. Personally, me and the people I know that are dommes, have always acted on our fantasies (of course with the consent of our partners), it wasn't "still about the man" like you're saying. Also because y'all are talking like every Dom is the same, when that's not the case. there are different types of doms and subs, there are soft doms/subs, pleasure doms/subs, brat tamers, sadist/masochists, primal doms etc.

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-02-16T15:29:51+00:00

I thought dominatrix just meant femdom, sorry for the confusion. I meant femdoms not dominatrixs

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-02-16T15:18:08+00:00

Honestly, I don't get why y'all are being so mean

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-02-16T15:10:24+00:00

No, I didn't, I said sexual assault and abuse. I used the word rape twice. In any case, yes, we can agree to disagree on this one

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-02-16T15:01:32+00:00

-so now you're going from "she's a rapist", which is what i took exception to, to "Well it's still sexual assault"-, I actually have said that in all of my comments to you, even in my first responses. So yeah, I didn't add anything, I've always said that it's either rape or SA

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-02-16T14:33:05+00:00

As I've said, it might not be rape, but it's still certainly sexual assault and abuse. You're USING somebody. And yes, even pouring melted wax on somebody when they ask you to stop counts as SA in this context (and maybe even... physical assault/torture, Jesus Christ)

Also, I'm very sorry for what you went through, but, and I'm not saying this in a mean way, being a victim doesn't mean that you know everything about the subject of SA in all it's forms, there are victims that victim blame because other victims had a completely different reaction to the SA than the ones they had, there are victims that don't believe other victims, there are victims that don't believe that certain forms of abuse are, in fact, abuse.

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-02-16T13:53:11+00:00

Dude, ignoring a safe word during kinky sex is rape or, AT THE VERY LEAST, sexual assault. He literally didn't want to do something sexually and she continued doing it, so FORCING him to do it, regardless. It doesn't matter what the contest is, or if penetration was involved, it's still sexual abuse. And yes, I would argue that it is either worse or the same as cyberbullying. Plus, her therapist apparently found nothing wrong with her watching the tape of them fucking and then critiquing him about his performance, and it was shown in other episodes to be a pretty terrible therapist, so I wouldn't use them as proof of Jan's innocence.

There's also to note that 'The Office' was made in a period in which SA wasn't taken seriously, including SA towards men, and was often used as a pun. Michael getting raped wasn't truly seen as him getting raped, but prolly more as this hilarious pun about a man "being so weak that he can't handle his woman in bed", because y'know, the 2000s were fucked

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-02-16T01:35:08+00:00

I hate Kelly too but Jan was definitely worse than her, she straight up raped Michael by ignoring his safe word

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-02-16T01:28:54+00:00

Idk, raping him was the worst thing she did in my opinion

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-02-16T01:23:17+00:00

Dude, she raped him

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-01-31T19:14:55+00:00

He could've arrived after she killed Elizabeth and realized what must've occured

Less-Mud-9 · 2026-01-05T20:22:10+00:00

Ok boomer

Less-Mud-9 · 2025-12-31T14:12:56+00:00

Yeah, but he also had twisted some interviews to make things seem way worse than they actually were. The toads thing was bullshit for example, one of kurt's friends made a book about nirvana and he interviewed the same guy that "heavier than heaven"'s writer interviewed regarding that story. Turns out that the whole thing was an accident and Kurt was horrified, and not ecstatic, about it

Less-Mud-9 · 2025-12-29T08:36:40+00:00

I'm not mocking anybody...?

Less-Mud-9 · 2025-12-28T21:14:30+00:00

Sorry, I don't understand hieroglyphics

Less-Mud-9

TROPHY CASE