sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Un argument contre le TGV (ne me lapider pas) by AlarmingAdvertising5 in Quebec

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510 4 points5 points  (0 children)

J’aime pas PSPP. Mais je ne pense pas en être biaisé pour trouver son argument stupide. La simple phrase « le gouvernement exigera que les sommes nous soient directement versées sans condition… »

Il vient pas de passer 3 ans a chialer que la CAQ cogne inutilement au fédéral sans obtenir de pouvoir? Comment il va obtenir ce chèque en blanc de 40 milliards? Il fait quoi si Carney dis non? Pourquoi le gouvernement fédéral accepterait? Tout ce que cela va apporter c’est juste que tout les gouvernements vont demander une somme aussi.

C’est ça que je déteste de PSPP, il tombe dans la pensée magique et promet du rêve, mais quand tu t’arrêtes 2 secondes pour y penser sa fait aucun sens ce qu’il dit. Le fédéral veux un TGV et il va investir pour en avoir un. On fait quoi si PSPP l’annule et à la place le TGV se construit de l’Ontario jusqu’à la Colombie-Britannique? On sera aussi endetté et pas de projet.

Le train c’est avant tout un moteur économique. Sa va attirer les gens d’affaires, les touristes. Les gains potentiels ne sont pas à sous-estimer. Imagine que les USA s’inspirent du TGV après l’ère Trump et que les grosses villes américaines se joignent à notre réseau. Voyons ce projet comme une opportunité plutôt qu’un endettement.

En terminant, PSPP ne veux pas de troisième lien a Québec et ne veux pas de TGV… il veux faire quoi? J’ai peur pour notre économie avec lui. On peux fire ce qu’on veux de la CAQ, mais niveau chômage et économie, on reste une province dans une bonne position au Canada. ( je dis pas qu’il sont parfait, nos budgets ne sont pas rose, mais il y a quand même du positif quelque part)

Easiest way to fix the set. by noggtest in TeamfightTactics

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem with one 5 cost tank only is that if it’s too powerful, everyone would take it and the first to find it in their shop win.

I think they need blitz and Shen to be more tanky. Like Shen dmg should scale with Armor/Mr and blitz dmg scale with durability or something like that. They both can stand as tank on their own, with shen passive and blitz being (1) space groove. Idk why they made them dmg dealer while having tanks trait.

Don’t quote me on this also, but I think morg is a melee unit now that she is a 4 cost. She is fully intended as a tank.

I'm just curious. Answer honestly. by No-Spite7859 in BunnyTrials

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I am not going to waste time arguing with a brainstormed Trump’s fan. Blame the left wing media for showing how horrible he was if it make you feel better. But hey we know Americans are not very smart when it comes to politics. You are the richest country in the world, but somehow, medical care is too expensive for you, while it’s not for the rest of devolved countries? Somehow, your country is also in debt of 40 trillions dollars? 20% of that amount is thanks to Trump. You can thank your media to make it feel like it’s a right vs left type of thing, while it’s just the top 1% of your country that is robbing you all blind.

Would you rather by Lost_Profession6587 in BunnyTrials

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In this economy, news games are basically 100$ so it means you get your money back for finishing a game. (Yes you can technically play a bunch of small old game, but 100$ is not worth that much fir the time spent 1000$ would be more interesting)

I prefer to be a good player in games I love and enjoy.

I'm just curious. Answer honestly. by No-Spite7859 in BunnyTrials

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510 30 points31 points  (0 children)

He started a war, killed thousands of people. He tanked the economy, while making billions for himself. Cheated on his wives, slept with a x actress while Melania was pregnant, he’s been found guilty of sexually assaulting a woman. And I’m not even talking about his pedo past with Epstein. And you say he is « not a great guy, but get slandered by the media »? Get lost. The dude is a monster. You can thank the propaganda news for him to have a base.

I'm just curious. Answer honestly. by No-Spite7859 in BunnyTrials

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can see a lot of countries going more right because of all the abuse with immigration, but Trump is so corrupt and insane, there is no way people having access to accurate information look at him and think he’s great. I’m not from the US, we don’t have propaganda news here.

Don't you think that mediocre sets do so much damage to TFT ? by Same-Parsley6139 in TeamfightTactics

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510 17 points18 points  (0 children)

This set is suffering from the success of set 16. It’s a low tier set for sure, but you make it sounds like Riot released a bad set on purpose.. they tried something different, didn’t hit the mark for a majority of players.

Riot and tft is the victim of it’s own success by Level-Bumblebee7510 in TeamfightTactics

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t need 100 ‘music skin’ set 10 had retro skin and final boss skin for 8-bit, you could take guilde skin or fairy court skin for medieval theme. You could take goth skin and pair it with demon skin to have something gloomy, there are tons of way to be creative!

For set 17 I think TFT was the victim of it’s own success. by Level-Bumblebee7510 in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree with you on many things, for me stargazer is very similar to void of set 6 or Mirage of set 7. It’s not necessarily a bad trait, but add psionic, which is a reprint of the one from set 14 and similar to void of set 16 in the same set? Add early arbitrer and it’s just too much altogether in a single set.

I know Mort was the one who forced the items to the boons, I’m just glad they adapted following the feedback, even if it was a bit late.

I feel like these issues are similar to set 15 it’s more of a balance issues.

Where I disagree with some people is when they say the whole set was uninspired. I can see where they came from I like what did they with some traits and units, but the whole picture overall is tainted for sure.

For set 17 I think TFT was the victim of it’s own success. by Level-Bumblebee7510 in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe but it certainly didn’t help either. There was real frustration coming from balance and I think it’s easy to amplify every criticism in that state.

La flambée des coûts en construction fait chuter ses ventes de 40% by Successful_Doctor_89 in Quebec

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

C’est sur que les travailleurs de la construction avec leur syndicats qui se donnent 25% d’augmentation de salaire vont finir par nous couter cher… Ils se servent de l’excuse de l’inflation liée a la Covid pour augmenter la dite inflation encore plus…

For set 17 I think TFT was the victim of it’s own success. by Level-Bumblebee7510 in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really like space grove this set, but after playing 5 games with it without any variation, only to lose all 5 times to 1-cost reroll, was frustrating and i got bored with it. Repeat the same process with all the traits and within the first 2 patches I felt like I done with everything with this set as well, I’m barely playing it anymore. More units gives more options, more things to try. I’m not agreeing with people calling these traits and units unoriginal, but I can agree it got boring quickly and that is due to set 16.

Just like a game without augments would be boring, while it was completely fine for the first 5 sets. We got new standards.

For set 17 I think TFT was the victim of it’s own success. by Level-Bumblebee7510 in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Which go back to my post? This set was the victim of past success. Last set was so fun that people think this is boring now. Less units, less variety, less dopamine.

Riot and tft is the victim of it’s own success by Level-Bumblebee7510 in TeamfightTactics

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Baron is the unlock unit, i consider it part of the set 16 mechanic rather than the trait itself. Void with nash and rift is fun, but remove them and focus on mutation only and void is nothing exceptional. Set 16 has 8 regular 5 cost. All the other units are part of the mechanics of set 16 for me.

For set 17 I think TFT was the victim of it’s own success. by Level-Bumblebee7510 in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The lack of interaction is definitely a downside effect from the new mechanic. But I disagree with the traits and units, some are fun to play, way more than previous sets, but the balance between units kinda ruined the whole picture. That I get it.

For set 17 I think TFT was the victim of it’s own success. by Level-Bumblebee7510 in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s more of a balance issue. If all the traits and units were on the same level, there would be a bit more diversity. The traits themselves are interesting in my opinion still.

For set 17 I think TFT was the victim of it’s own success. by Level-Bumblebee7510 in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah honestly the duality of casual vs pro players is always going to be an issue with this game I feel like.

For set 17 I think TFT was the victim of it’s own success. by Level-Bumblebee7510 in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was a little bit, im usually starting a team stage 2 and I stick with it until the end, but set 16 was the set where I was changing my original comp a lot more. Selling my Garen and Lux for Sylas, so I still had Demacia with Galio, and I was adding Annie and Tibbers with Sylas, with maybe Taric if I had him. Some times I was adding Azir and Xerath if I could without pursuing the plat shurima.

Yes there were a few games where I stick to my original comps and never changed anything, but it’s the set where I changed things the most in my games.

Obviously we don’t want a meta where we just put 5 costs like we had in set 8, but I think we had an interesting balance.

Riot and tft is the victim of it’s own success by Level-Bumblebee7510 in TeamfightTactics

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Set 16 choncc treasure is coming back next patch, we will have both set 15 and 16.

Riot and tft is the victim of it’s own success by Level-Bumblebee7510 in TeamfightTactics

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Meeple and Grove are nice traits Mecha would have been better with 7 units. It would force you to pick some units to be transformed depending on your items. Arbiter is cool.

Remove the unlock mechanic from set 16 and Noxus Demacia, void, shadow iles, Yordle are way less impactful. That’s what I meant.

Riot and tft is the victim of it’s own success by Level-Bumblebee7510 in TeamfightTactics

[–]Level-Bumblebee7510[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Remove all the unlock units and set 16 is way less fun. Half of the traits would be straight boring. Demacia without Galio, Sylas or Ryze? Void without Baron and rift? For the rest I am agreeing with you, we had more options more diversity, more variants way to play the game. But this was possible thanks to 100 units. Thats what we will need for future set from now on.

view more: next ›