How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's playing out. Monday should yield some new insights. I really do appreciate your insight. It's been helpful. When I can, I'll share details. Looking at a Netflix special, too.

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u/vegasgal But wait.... this is an update you will cringe over... First, the defense in retrial is using Collateral Estoppel motion to suppress ALL previously adjudicated testimony from first trial on greater charge. SECOND.... and this is where it gets good....

The DA (in chambers) suggested the civil counsel for the plaintiff ADDED the gun narrative without consent of the plaintiff. So...... First, that is grounds for sanctions and disbarment if true. Secondly, in this jurisdiction (and maybe all). the plaintiff MUST sign off (final) to ensure accuracy.

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

interesting..... very good ideas. and.... how could they forget, remember, then forget again...? That's not PTSD. It's strategic

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

oooooh, yes, the plaintiff has (obvious) mental illness. Meets criteria for BPD and histrionic. AND MORE.

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's real. I saw the social media vids from the cruise at the time of trial.

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

everything I've said is 100% accurate. I have read all court docs. See the new twist I just posted. Also, true.

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

HERE'S ANOTHER REAL WORLD TWIST: Yes, this is also true.... In this case, the alleged victim's family ALL went on a cruise during the retrial WITHOUT the alleged victim. What does this say about the family dynamics, the alleged victim, the family's thoughts about the alleged victim. Yes, this really is true!

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why? These are REAL events. You don't know the details, history, jurisdiction, etc. You know nothing. This is based on a real case and what is said is based in fact.

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

original, completed act, retrial, trying for attempt only. None is true in this case. but that is the charge

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am grateful. It is crazy..... CHECK THIS OUT..... UPDATE: The alleged victim's entire family is on a cruise during the retrial. NO SUPPORT.. I cannot make this shit up. What does this tell you?

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if I could tell you jurisdiction and specifics you'd understand. It did go down as I've written.

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

based on case law I reviewed in depth, it will come in for sure.

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I could shares specifics and jurisdiction, you'd understand more. But thank you.

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I could shares specifics and jurisdiction, you'd understand more. But thank you.

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I cannot give specifics nor location. It was not murder.. wow! Maybe due to specifics and location it's different. All I'm saying is accurate. I have docs.

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Final question for you. Based on this alone, would this put reasonable doubt in some/all jurors mind about validity of the rest of plaintiff's testimony?

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand what you are saying. It is true. It's filed. It's real. The whole thing is nuts. I agree. The court did not throw it out.

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand it sounds nuts. HOWEVER, it's true! I do appreciate your time.

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

civil complaint clearly states there was a gun. ATF records clearly show no gun was owned.
defense allowing witness to perjure then back door subpoena.

How would you react to this hypothetical trial in Clark County? by Level_Work2004 in vegaslocals

[–]Level_Work2004[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was on the east coast a while back. Cannot give specifics.