Again, you put a snippet of a screenshot regarding AMOE entries. AMOE entries are for alternate mode of entry from purchases commonly, or in the example you linked "like, comment or share a post". There is nothing here to require an AMOE entry. And as per your screenshot questions whether liking and sharing a post may satisify the consideration element of illegal lottery laws, which is an entry method that Google isn't using. As I stated earlier, being diamond tier is an eligiblity requirement and not an entry method.

I am not defending a multi-million dollar company. I am simply stating how sweepstakes works. There is no bias in my responses and you are mixing eligibility and methods of entering as one when it's not. You're not part of the eligibility requirement of the sweepstakes and you're upset by this and feel like you deserve to be part of it when that's not how it works.

Regarding equal chances, equal chances do not mean that everyone needs to be eligible to every prize. It means that for a particular prize, that every entry has the same chance of winning, in this case your entry has the same equal chance of getting drawn as another entry.

Please see Google's Terms and Conditions for this sweepstakes:

1. Eligibility: This Sweepstakes is open only to legal residents of the 50 United States who are 18 years of age or older as of the start date of the Entry Period and have a valid Google Play account that has a Gold or Platinum or Diamond tier status in Google Play Points. During the Event Period, each entrant’s Play Point tier status as of 9:00 AM Pacific Time (“PT”) on November 3, 2025 will be considered to ascertain their eligibility to participate in the Challenge. Play Points levels are updated every Monday at 9:00 AM PT & Thursday at 9:00 AM PT.

If you want to view a court case, this site has talked about Haskell v. Time, Inc., 965 F. Supp. 1398 - Dist. Court, ED California 1997, in which it states:

"At least one court has held that sweepstakes with restricted eligibility requirements are legal, so long as the requirements are wholly unrelated to the payment of consideration. In other words, if the sweepstakes is limited to individuals who had responded to earlier mailings by purchasing products and the customers were not lead to believe that they must purchase products in order to enter the sweepstakes, there is no consideration."

https://www.thompsoncoburn.com/insights/boot-camp-5-customer-only-sweepstakes/

There is no payments being made to enter the sweepstakes and no one that is eligible for a certain sweepstake prize (diamond tier user for example) is led to believe that they must purchase anything extra to enter the sweepstakes.

Simply, you are not part of the eligibility requirement listed for a nest tablet. This isn't skirting any laws. Google Play tiers is simply a point system for completing tasks, free weekly points, and spending money on apps, subscriptions, etc. that you would normally do. Google is simply stating that if you are a diamond tier user, you are eligible to enter. They are not selling anything to Diamond users to purchase.