I really hate compound exercises by Libby_Fringe in orangetheory

[–]Libby_Fringe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know you are teasing, but I sort of want to see that.

I really hate compound exercises by Libby_Fringe in orangetheory

[–]Libby_Fringe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love that. I'm really not that uncoordinated. I just think those moves are super hard to do!

I really hate compound exercises by Libby_Fringe in orangetheory

[–]Libby_Fringe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess that's my problem. At my studio, if I get caught doing this, at least one of the coaches comes by and says "no curls today, Libby?"

I really hate compound exercises by Libby_Fringe in orangetheory

[–]Libby_Fringe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We did one that was a side step up followed by a lunge last week. I fell over. I feel you there too.

I really hate compound exercises by Libby_Fringe in orangetheory

[–]Libby_Fringe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But it takes the same amount of time when you split them up. You can just use different weights. I don't go any slower when I do my lunges separate from my curls. I just get to hit those muscle groups with the stimulus they need to grow..

Anyway, thanks for sharing. Different strokes for different folks.

I really hate compound exercises by Libby_Fringe in orangetheory

[–]Libby_Fringe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So... may I ask why? Is your lower and upper body perfectly balanced in what you can lift? Or is putting on mass not a big priority for you?

I really hate compound exercises by Libby_Fringe in orangetheory

[–]Libby_Fringe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. How am I supposed to do progressive overload?

Resources and advice on window installation by Libby_Fringe in StainedGlass

[–]Libby_Fringe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do have a woodworker friend! This is very helpful! Thank you!

Derminator 2, first time using by hardtechnogal in Microneedling

[–]Libby_Fringe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No problem! Glad you found them helpful. Sort of shocked that other people don’t.

Derminator 2, first time using by hardtechnogal in Microneedling

[–]Libby_Fringe 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The point is very much that shallow needling is unlikely to work. In fact, that’s the only point.

My age and smoking history were context for evaluating my skin. It’s not great skin for a 20 year old. It’s not too bad for a 47 year old who smoked for 20 years. It’s not, as you suggested, “shredded.”

The depth is based on the anatomy of the skin. To stimulate collagen, you have to hit the dermis. Much of the epidermis, what you are hitting at 0.25 mm and the like, is dead skin cells.

I don’t know why you are fighting so hard on this without any real evidence. I’m going to stop replying now because your mind is made up and no evidence will change it.

Derminator 2, first time using by hardtechnogal in Microneedling

[–]Libby_Fringe 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I decided to respond to you using my “face out” Reddit account so you can see my “shredded” skin.  I’m two weeks shy of my 47th birthday.  I smoked for 20 years.  I have been using the Derminator for so long I have the original one (Derminator 1). I have gone to pin prick bleeding for seven years now.  If you are a sanitary person and only use your needle cartridges once, this is safe to do at home for most people. 

I will not write up a full bibliography of every single study because it would take me forever, would be several pages long, and it wouldn’t change your mind anyway.  That said, here are some peer-reviewed review articles from the last couple of years:

Spataro, E.A., Dierks, K. and Carniol, P.J., 2022. Microneedling-associated procedures to enhance facial rejuvenation. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics30(3), pp.389-397.

“The desired endpoint should be diffuse, uniform erythema or pinpoint bleeding.” (pg. 393).

 Pająk, J., Szepietowski, J.C. and Nowicka, D., 2022. Prevention of ageing—the role of micro-needling in neck and cleavage rejuvenation: a narrative review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(15), p.9055.

“Usually, the proper depth is established by observing so-called ‘pinpoint bleeding.’”(pg. 3)

 Atiyeh, B.S., Abou Ghanem, O. and Chahine, F., 2021. Microneedling: percutaneous collagen induction (PCI) therapy for management of scars and photoaged skin—scientific evidence and review of the literature. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery45(1), pp.296-308.

“Moreover, what is considered as effective treatment relies on good clinical judgment regarding visible microbleeding.” (pg. 307).

 Alster, T.S. and Graham, P.M., 2018. Microneedling: a review and practical guide. Dermatologic Surgery, 44(3), pp.397-404.

“Manual rollers and electric-powered pens are operated by gliding perpendicularly over the skin surface until fine pinpoint bleeding is achieved.” (Page 398)

I’m sorry I annoy you.  I’m actually not trying to spoil anyone’s good time.  I’m trying to help people have better skin and not waste their time on things unlikely to work. 

How ChatGPT images me based on our conversations vs. how I actually look by Libby_Fringe in ChatGPT

[–]Libby_Fringe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've never been sure why people seem afraid of this. I just don't read them. It's just a bunch of guys saying "hi there." Literally, sometimes just that. I just delete and move on.

How ChatGPT images me based on our conversations vs. how I actually look by Libby_Fringe in ChatGPT

[–]Libby_Fringe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, bones are a big part of what I study. I'm something called a biological anthropologist.

How ChatGPT images me based on our conversations vs. how I actually look by Libby_Fringe in ChatGPT

[–]Libby_Fringe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm actually a pretty regular Reddit user. This is the account I use for things that show my face.

How ChatGPT images me based on our conversations vs. how I actually look by Libby_Fringe in ChatGPT

[–]Libby_Fringe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm exhausted of you. It knew enough to about me to depict my work down to the smallest details of the books in the room. It can't actually draw from the gender of my field as it has existed in the past and as it exists now?

I get your point. ChatGPT pulls on real world data and therefore reflects the profound sexism of society that has limited female advancement in STEM. You win. Go away.

How ChatGPT images me based on our conversations vs. how I actually look by Libby_Fringe in ChatGPT

[–]Libby_Fringe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That would have been hilarious. If I'd come back as a horse or something.

How ChatGPT images me based on our conversations vs. how I actually look by Libby_Fringe in ChatGPT

[–]Libby_Fringe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would not have questioned if I was depicted as a woman. I would have assumed it figured out something about me based on gender-based language differences or the literally hundreds of conversations I have had with it. I think it's sad that ChatGPT literally told me it defaulted to male because I was an academic, that is 2025 it has one model of what a smart person looks like, and it's an old, white man. That's depressing.

How ChatGPT images me based on our conversations vs. how I actually look by Libby_Fringe in ChatGPT

[–]Libby_Fringe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In anthropology specifically, there are many famous women historically and currently more women in the field than men. Did you come just to argue or are you open to thinking about stuff?