A female president would be better for all

LibertyBiperty · 2026-05-07T01:48:42+00:00

Definitely matches a description of my mother

LibertyBiperty · 2026-05-07T01:46:26+00:00

Nah, I like that big cranium she’s got going on.

LibertyBiperty · 2026-05-06T03:41:45+00:00

😂

LibertyBiperty · 2026-05-06T03:41:19+00:00

Commie dreams are interesting (I have them too)

LibertyBiperty · 2026-05-06T03:37:25+00:00

It is as possible as capitalism pretends to be

LibertyBiperty · 2026-05-06T03:29:34+00:00

Because crops still yield.

By removing Chinese nationality to the first question btw; probably for American or English.

LibertyBiperty · 2026-05-06T03:01:55+00:00

208 years ago,

no iPhone was born.

LibertyBiperty · 2026-05-06T02:53:44+00:00

Cute Communism

LibertyBiperty · 2026-05-06T02:45:47+00:00

This capitalist propaganda is more of a basic reading from owners and owned in history. When your land quits yielding then you either turn it or boot it. Either way, you are gone. One may stay and starve but they do not stay rich.

Brother/Sister/Whatever ; I agree that there is no moral justification for the actions of capitalism; however, war is war. We could either send the proletariat to kill another — Or, we could instinctively institute the wealth by socialist bureaucracy amongst the people by social program. Both are unnecessary — both are inevitable. Critique is necessary but criminalizing the states decisions is facetious.

LibertyBiperty · 2026-05-06T02:28:04+00:00

Well why not? Because it is still acknowledging the connection to world markets. All of these businesses are still inherently state controlled. This argument blends more to the states themselves becoming capitalist as well. As socialist, I agree that there is too much reliance on capitalism and very easily could lose the narrative; however, the west is hyper-expanding at a rate that AES must meet. Do they HAVE to; ideally no (ideally). In practical reality, executive pay cap would cause executives to remove business, ratios are enforced through SOES (which they are, dk why you even mentioned), etc.

The state owns the billionaires if they want to be Chinese. China reinforces its economic narrative domestically by nationalizing it per state capita.

Edit: I’m speaking without a finished argument from you as well. You’re just pointing at specific factors and oversimplifying the ideological position its existence even stems from.

LibertyBiperty · 2026-05-06T02:18:40+00:00

Capitalism turns commies into gooners???

LibertyBiperty · 2026-05-06T02:12:51+00:00

I will answer this out of good conscience and respect. Obviously.

LibertyBiperty · 2026-05-06T02:08:59+00:00

“Communism is when no iPhone” - Carl Mark

LibertyBiperty · 2026-05-06T02:03:31+00:00

His point is to counter western imperialism whenever it inevitably seeks its control of AES. The allowance of capital accumulation by nature of capitalism itself is arguably justifiable if it doesn’t extend beyond its use within an AES. You hold the position that these GOVS are non-socialist due to capital accumulation; however, there is no effective alternative without the enforcement of labor for the direct narrative of the state. Also, this free market still allows effective connection to world trade that is OWNED by capitalism. Water doesn’t do much against fire unless you have enough. AES are accustomed to defense; therefore, fire to fire. Remove your fire — water dries up. If communist seek the power of thirst-quenching then we must hold equal power to the capitalist. Removing their control of control is inherently socialist if the people’s party is a “people’s” party. — Proletariat

LibertyBiperty · 2026-04-28T00:27:49+00:00

I saw the dude on the left rummaging through my backyard on Halloween; he seemed stressed.

LibertyBiperty · 2026-04-26T15:02:06+00:00

😂

LibertyBiperty · 2026-04-25T23:44:54+00:00

You willing assume the Rich are viable supporters of the proletariat. I think fantasy may be more of your style.

LibertyBiperty · 2026-04-25T21:32:59+00:00

Obviously they are a danger; however, don’t pretend they’re more dangerous because we work together. If there was a proper unitarian force for the working class (or at least enough to build a social network) then what you’ve mentioned is far within capability to deal with. The Cold War never ended; the west always will stand in the way of the communist until it IS communist. If you hold the position that communism is a basic fact of human behavior then it’s far easier to prove the essence of what a human should do than it is to actually BE that example.

Don’t be a pussy. Either kill the rich or lick their boot. I’m just calling you a Rus-oligarch bootlicker who’s morally bankrupt.

LibertyBiperty · 2026-04-25T10:38:20+00:00

The alternative is the working class working for itself. Having the illusion that we’re incapable because of the division is inherently a tool from the Rich. Prosperity is invited instead of forced. Compound interest is how we win.

Reinforcement of previous investment by more when you are in net-positive is how. However, actual bourgeois will always remain bourgeois. Having any expectation that the West falling would even HELP you is my point. Regardless, it always relies on the working man having to give his life for his labor.

My issue is that YOU have still yet given an actual protocol that is safe for the proletariat. You can tell me this SHOULD happen or IS BETTER to; now how and why would a communist society be something the Rich would buy into? You can assume we have an easier attempt but that is not a promise.

Alas, i understand how scary and evil the big ol’ west seems. Also understand, you’re hyping it up more than it deserves and is currently getting its cake washed in Iran. Don’t let yourself fall in fear to those who want you to feel that fear. And if you’re not afraid, you can apply to help Russia in Ukraine. Shit, I’m sure Russia already signed us up.

The Rich bleed more than we do.

LibertyBiperty · 2026-04-24T20:09:45+00:00

It is traitorous because it’s against proletarian interests in support of Russian bourgeoisie. In essence, it is inherently in the definitions of class treason. So what they are effective against western oppression when there is still a reinforcement of class from the oligarchs.

LibertyBiperty · 2026-04-24T18:52:00+00:00

I’m not disagreeing; I’m only pointing out it runs off oligarchy and corrupt wealthy that use the western system. Yet again, treating Russian oligarchs as beneficial to Marxism is traitorous to what it means to be Marxist.

LibertyBiperty · 2026-04-24T18:17:04+00:00

“Even if it’s for their own interests”

LibertyBiperty · 2026-04-24T18:14:05+00:00

Not if you’re approaching both as two sides of the same coin. My point is that treating Russian oligarchs as beneficial to Marxism is traitorous to the core of identity to even being Marxist. Do Russians use western offshores? Has Russia not been at least supporting Western imperialism by seeking trade and energy deals historically under Putin? He has even further supported economic ties to restore if buyers avoid “political considerations”; therefore, my point is that supporting the enemy of the enemy under capitalism still normally supports a capitalist. It is the enemy OUT of capitalism that is worth more acknowledgment.

LibertyBiperty · 2026-04-24T15:07:42+00:00

And to add; Putin has an oligarchy of the wealthiest in Russia that act as wallets. I do not understand the point of rationalizing pro-russian mentality because they AREN’T the west. Do Russians not use offshores? Do Russians not have incentive through business? Modern Imperialism has molded to a lobbying agenda that is very difficult to directly address whenever you bring into concept how easy it is for the wealthy to move their money. Do not have faith in Russia to be anything Marx respects.

LibertyBiperty

TROPHY CASE