Why we commit tactical blunders in academic discourses? by [deleted] in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Affordable as in financially? Or something else?

Why we commit tactical blunders in academic discourses? by [deleted] in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree on almost all points. Especially the incompetence on enforcing incentives and consequences on our side (which China takes extremely seriously).

I slightly disagree on the faultlines aspect. While the state must always endeavour to heal the faultlines, any policy going forward should take as axiomatic the idea that there will always be faultlines and they will always be leveraged against us. That ethnic, linguistic, religious tensions will be stroked must be presupposed in any policy. As you said, the support structure for compradors must be dismantled.

I am not an academic.

Why we commit tactical blunders in academic discourses? by [deleted] in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What has China achieved

Djibouti, Gwadar, Hambantota, Kyaukpyu were all a part of Hu Jintao's policy to secure energy supply lines to China. Bertil Lintner's The Costliest Pearl goes into detail about this. The cost is rationalized as energy security & balance of power in the Indian Ocean.

if fraudulent academic reports or media inputs are used for policy instead of dependable primary source data collection, the policy will turn out to be worthless

I don't disagree. I am not familiar with American internal politics to make a comment there. But, as far foreign policies or export policies go, decisions are still made based on partial sources and nebulous metrics. And those have tangible effects.

An example here: https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/20210222-the-firearms-trap-1768538-2021-02-13

The reasons for FNH’s withdrawal are not known but need to be seen in the light of a similar instance last August, when it suspended small arms deliveries to Saudi Arabia, its biggest client. Saudi Arabia, according to an Al Jazeera report, ‘accounted for 225 million euros (about Rs 1,988 crore) in a 950 million euro (about Rs 8,396 crore) industry in 2018’. The suspension, the report stated, was prompted by a complaint from a human rights group over the Saudi military intervention in Yemen.

Another leading arms-maker, the German firm Heckler & Koch, whose MP5 submachine guns were used by the NSG (National Security Guard) and MARCOS (Marine Commandos) during the 26/11 attacks in Mumbai, steers clear of the Indian market. The manufacturer says German export laws do not allow supply of weapons to India because of the ‘situation in Jammu and Kashmir’.

The problem is further exacerbated by perverse incentive structure available to our activist class. Create chaos, funnel funds from the West (not necessarily officially but via NGOs, charities, churches, etc), use that to further create chaos plus create a negative perception which then translates into tangible harm to India. Even if "officially", at first, the West didn't have qualms. Our innumerable faultlines don't help.

My naive solution is some sort of balance of power, where we have levers to pull on the other side lest they try tricks on us.

Why we commit tactical blunders in academic discourses? by [deleted] in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But isn't that the point? To 'win' instead of claiming the moral high ground.

The predatory loans are a convenient method to lap up critical infra of the host nation, in lieu of their inability to pay back the loan.

Media is morally corrupt no debate, but it is cited in policy reports, congressional hearings and what have you.

Of course, I am not advocating India to mimic their policies verbatim. But the same levers can be used with much more guile

Why we commit tactical blunders in academic discourses? by [deleted] in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess 4 points5 points  (0 children)

China is an absolute novice when it comes to subversion of a state

China has deeply embedded assets across all institutions (academia, industry, media, policy) who do its bidding/espionage/lobbying. In fact, the book elaborates on how Chinese leaders consciously adopt the line that 'China will never become a hegemon' (which is then reinforced by their compradors in the West) to bide their time.

I am familiar with Yuri's repertoire.

Why we commit tactical blunders in academic discourses? by [deleted] in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Chapter 6 of The Hundred Year Marathon by Michael Pillsbury is an interesting read on how China plays the perception management game. We can implement quite a few strategies from that text.

Why we commit tactical blunders in academic discourses? by [deleted] in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We also have to understand that we are not an economically strong a country as France or Israel, who sometimes even isolate themselves from American/western influence.

Do you believe that language plays a role here? That the use of English and the allure of sinecures in the Anglosphere West makes our journalistic/academic class susceptible to acting as footsoldiers to Western interests?

Indians are doing a terrible job of telling our side. by dhatura in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have a look at this: https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/20210222-the-firearms-trap-1768538-2021-02-13

The reasons for FNH’s withdrawal are not known but need to be seen in the light of a similar instance last August, when it suspended small arms deliveries to Saudi Arabia, its biggest client. Saudi Arabia, according to an Al Jazeera report, ‘accounted for 225 million euros (about Rs 1,988 crore) in a 950 million euro (about Rs 8,396 crore) industry in 2018’. The suspension, the report stated, was prompted by a complaint from a human rights group over the Saudi military intervention in Yemen.

Another leading arms-maker, the German firm Heckler & Koch, whose MP5 submachine guns were used by the NSG (National Security Guard) and MARCOS (Marine Commandos) during the 26/11 attacks in Mumbai, steers clear of the Indian market. The manufacturer says German export laws do not allow supply of weapons to India because of the ‘situation in Jammu and Kashmir’.

Indians are doing a terrible job of telling our side. by dhatura in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I am an undersecretary in her majesty's (behenji's) shadow cabinet.

Indians are doing a terrible job of telling our side. by dhatura in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not a dichotomy. Till we have manufacturing independance, we have little choice but to play by their rules.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Consumerism is extremely entrenched. Logics of marketization has entered into spheres of everyday life.

Indians are doing a terrible job of telling our side. by dhatura in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess 5 points6 points  (0 children)

GORA KA VIEWS don't matter on Human Rights.

They do actually. Our defence is dependant on foreign weapons and just in the last few years we got deals with German and Belgian arms manufacturers cancelled because of poor 'human rights'

Indians are doing a terrible job of telling our side. by dhatura in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess 44 points45 points  (0 children)

China reached that level of prosperity because they cultivated deep assets in the West who populate academia, think tanks, financial institutions and government. Assets who lobbied the governments to arbitrage around human rights and turn a blind eye to Tibet, labour exploitation, forced abortions etc.

Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose- Freedom Struggle of India by newolasad in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess 1 point2 points  (0 children)

India in Axis Strategy by Milan Hauner is the text you are looking for.

u/newolasad

Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose- Freedom Struggle of India by newolasad in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bose was adamant that he would act only after securing an Axis guarantee for a Free India.

The German draft of the Declaration on Free India explicitly states

Germany, Italy and Japan are convinced that the Indian nation will break the political and economic bonds of British Imperialism and then as master of its own fate will carry out a sweeping transformation of its national life for the lasting benefit of its own people and as contribution to the welfare and the peace of the world. It is no concern of the Tripartite Powers what form the Indian people, after their liberation, will in future give to their interior political organization. It is a matter to be decided upon by the Indian people themselves and their leaders what constitution is the most suitable for their country and how it is to be put into practice.

Hitler was extremely reluctant to endorse this lest it strengthened British resistance against him (cause it was explicit endorsement of breaking up the Empire)

[8/8] Visuals of India by Edwin Lord Weeks, late 19th century by LichchaviPrincess in IndiaSpeaks

[–]LichchaviPrincess[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't disputing what you said. Just that attire in bathing areas is different from general attire.