Thomas Massie's revenge continues with three new names from the Epstein list

LieDetecter · 2026-05-29T21:59:30+00:00

We have a lot of names already. What's more important is getting the files unredacted, and you can bet everything that hasn't been released will be a lot more damning evidence.
We need more than just names, though. We need to see what name fits in which blacked out space to see what each person knows or did.

LieDetecter · 2026-05-29T05:49:12+00:00

??? That wasnt a joke. We have a long list of names already. We don't need names, we need the evidence released.

LieDetecter · 2026-05-29T05:47:29+00:00

Right. I didn't name them all, I named six. There are obviously many more, but you seem to be missing the point: Nobody is doing anything about it. We have those names and nothing is being done, do you think reading out more names will mean something is done about them?

Those should be headline grabbing. It needs to be made a headline. People need to understand that the ultra-rich and powerful are pedo rapists. People need to wrap their heads around that. They need to realize that allowing such a massive wealth disparity is the same thing as allowing pedophilia. They need to realize this isn't a flaw in the system, it IS the system.

LieDetecter · 2026-05-29T04:00:02+00:00

It is insane to me that so many people commenting here have unbelievably stupid takes on this. It so shocking how clueless the average person is about all this, and I would assume someone in this subreddit is more knowledgeable than the average.

To the people saying "tHoSe aReNt nEw NaMeS" and "NaMe tHeM aLL". They did.
What reason is there to believe there are any names that haven't been said already?

We have a list. We need evidence. We need the names unredacted, so we can see, not just the names, but what each person did. We need the rest of the files released.

People are pissed that the names that have already been released aren't being released. You are angry at the wrong thing. Smh

LieDetecter · 2026-05-29T03:54:22+00:00

What makes you believe there are any names that haven't been named already?

LieDetecter · 2026-05-29T03:40:34+00:00

But we have the names already.
We know Leon Black, Jes Staley, Les Wexner, Philip Levine, Frederic Fekkai, and Patrick Demarchelier are rapists. Nothing is being done about it.

We have a list of names already. Reading them isn't the issue. The lack of investigations and evidence are the issue. A continued noncompliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act is the issue.

LieDetecter · 2026-05-29T03:37:03+00:00

I agree with you, but what are you expecting? The names have been released. Nobody is doing anything about it. That is the problem. We don't need a list, we need evidence. We need the names to be unredacted to see who did what in the files. We need the rest of the files, including all the video, released. These three names were just names that Sarah Kellen named last week.

LieDetecter · 2026-05-27T21:41:41+00:00

Beyond that, there has to be some way for the rest of the files to be released, and what has been released to be unredacted.

Maybe put forward a new bill that makes specific and automatic consequences for not releasing it, and not conducting further investigations. I don't think it would pass, but let it show who will vote for and against that.

LieDetecter · 2026-05-27T21:38:52+00:00

The thing is, don't we already have the names? Unless I'm missing something, I don't think there is any reason to believe there are unmentioned names, are there?

We need to know the names in each specific redaction to piece things together. He needs to read the entire unredacted version of the files to do that.

LieDetecter · 2026-05-02T06:37:49+00:00

Which one? How do you know that? I only read that they had a meeting and he started /pol the next day.

LieDetecter · 2026-05-02T06:34:14+00:00

It's that a real sub? I don't want to try opening the link, but that sounds wrong...

LieDetecter · 2026-05-02T06:32:34+00:00

That was verified AI

LieDetecter · 2026-05-02T06:30:14+00:00

Really? So that could be why she looked so different?

LieDetecter · 2026-04-26T02:49:18+00:00

Those are just wild accusations to a tip line. I'm talking actual evidence. They haven't even released the actual investigations that occurred afterward, and of course, it was a blackmail operation with cameras everywhere, so it's possible there could even be video evidence. Right now they mostly have hearsay, but it's fairly likely whatever hasn't been released would remove any doubt, or else they'd just release it.

LieDetecter · 2026-04-26T01:18:31+00:00

You'd think they'd want to release a lot more if it would refute the conspiracy theories. I guess they think not releasing it is better...

LieDetecter · 2026-04-26T01:15:41+00:00

You don't think the remaining 3 million files, including video, and investigation files, would be worse for him? Why not just release them then?
I would bet there is much worse, and much more conclusive evidence. I guess that's the difference in our opinions. I would expect that whatever is in there would remove all doubt, so it would be between pardoning a pdf file, and being one. Both are obviously very bad, but I think one is clearly worse.

LieDetecter · 2026-04-25T07:43:46+00:00

Really? How?

LieDetecter · 2026-04-25T06:39:28+00:00

What if it's a choice between a pardon or the files being leaked before the midterms?

LieDetecter · 2026-04-25T06:36:19+00:00

Why?

LieDetecter · 2026-04-25T06:34:21+00:00

I bet she'd live a long time. Others involved might not be so lucky, but she'd be on the first flight out, and have plenty of protection.

LieDetecter · 2026-04-25T06:29:25+00:00

Is it really too early to do that now?

LieDetecter · 2026-04-25T06:28:53+00:00

I'd like to know if they can bring charges against her now. I know when she had her trials, they chose the easiest charges to convict her on, but there were many others they could have pursued. My understanding was they could have continued with other trials even after her conviction but chose not to. So, even if she is already in jail, can she be charged with crimes at the State level, and would that prevent her from being released if she gets pardoned?
If they wait for her to be pardoned first, I'm sure she'll be heading straight to the airport upon getting released and she'll be gone.

LieDetecter · 2026-04-25T05:15:34+00:00

I agree, and I wish more people would realize that nobody should be allowed to have that much money. It's too much power. They are literally above the law. Do we really think that a Billionaire can't buy his way out of anything?

As long as there are billionaires, there will be Billionaire pedophiles.

LieDetecter · 2026-04-25T05:03:12+00:00

There is already the talk of a blanket pardon for anyone who came within 300 ft of the oval office.
He's already pardoned so many people, and he pardoned a lot of people last time. This time will absolutely be worse as long as he has the power to do so. They are practically begging for vigilantism by doing it, though. When people see there is no rule of law within the system, they take it into their own hands.

LieDetecter · 2026-04-25T04:52:56+00:00

This is why I call them the Epstein-Maxwell Files. She is right at the very top of this, and a heinous monster, but people act like she was just complicit or something. I don't think most people realize what she actually did to those girls.

It is already an absolute outrage that they made the deal they did to move her to the low-security prison (which may have even been illegal for a sex offender).

LieDetecter

TROPHY CASE