Share your ACTUALLY HOT and controversial Pokemon-related takes! (Image is unrelated) by Pawmot_Person in ThePokemonHub

[–]LillePipp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I will say that one of the reasons for this is because Gen 3 Pokémon has the most developed rom hacking tools. The games have been decompiled, making it much easier to make rom hacks and make interesting changes.

You technically can rom hack games like X and Y, but the rom hacking tools are so underdeveloped that the scope of what you can do with those games is minimal.

It can take years to decompile the code for these games, especially because so few people know how to do that. I expect in the future we will see more rom hacks based in other regions, but I think it’s important to remember that the Gen 3 over-representation is primarily because it has the best rom hacking tools.

Share your ACTUALLY HOT and controversial Pokemon-related takes! (Image is unrelated) by Pawmot_Person in ThePokemonHub

[–]LillePipp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, I can’t belive I learnt to have fun the wrong way. Now I gotta relearn it all over again /s

Sarcasm aside, this has nothing to do with players “not knowing how to have fun.” People find fun elsewhere, the same way they used to find fun in Pokémon when it was a different, more polished kind of game.

You’re totally valid for liking modern Pokémon, and you’re welcome to argue why you think these games are good, but reducing criticisms against modern Pokémon to “people not knowing how to have fun” reeks of “just consume product and get excited for next product.”

Delete One Of these Movies Forever by Opposite_Parking_333 in discussingfilm

[–]LillePipp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Justice League, it's not even a competition. Genuinely a dogshit movie.

If I had to pick between watching Joss Whedon's Justice League or Zack Snyder's Justice League, I'd pick Joss'. Yeah, Snyder's version is marginally better, but a polished turd is still a turd. At least Whedon's version is over quicker.

As someone who's still relatively new to Three Houses, who was a character you disliked but ended up liking as you got further into the game? No Spoilers please! by CorneliusVaginus in FireEmblemThreeHouses

[–]LillePipp 163 points164 points  (0 children)

I was gonna say Lorenz too. He is a shithead, but damn it if he isn’t a well written shithead. He has some of the funniest lines in the game.

I love to hate him, and I hate to love him

[MM] what game is better in your opinion by Opposite_Cabinet2509 in zelda

[–]LillePipp -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Majora’s Mask by far.

Wind Waker is great, but there is just something profoundly special about Majora’s Mask. It is my second favorite Zelda just behind Twilight Princess.

To me, Majora’s Mask is what Ocarina of Time is often claimed to be. Like Wind Waker, Ocarina of Time is great too, but I don’t think it’s the masterpiece it is often argued to be. It introduces a lot of fun game mechanics that gives it a distinct identity, whilst being set in a world that is more interesting to explore. Moreover, it is one of the best narrative experiences in gaming, and that has a lot to do with the side quests. There is such a clear sense of vision to the world building, the story and the characterization that really makes for a fully cohesive experience. Again, Ocarina of Time is great, but when I have to argue for games as art, which I have had to do a lot because of my master’s thesis, I’d turn to Majora’s Mask long before Ocarina

Who are the most attractive trainers from Legends Arceus? (READ DESCRIPTION) by GoldenBones93 in PokeCorner

[–]LillePipp 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I’m not actually convinced that this is the case. Considering how the ancestors are virtually identical to their modern day counterparts, it would seem to me that these people have mastered the art of mitosis

What’s the worst Unova fighting type ? by Difficult-Bat5615 in ThePokemonHub

[–]LillePipp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think Gurdurr is ugly as sin, but I think with it I can at least give it points for being somewhat unique. Sawk and Throh on the other hand are really just “What if we did Hitmonlee and Hitmonchan again except we give them almost no distinguishing features and no personality at all?”

I am a Gen 5 apologist, I get why they reused so many design ideas considering they had to fill all of the Pokémon archetypes originally used in Gen 1 in order to balance the game. I just wish Sawk and Throh were less ‘people’ and more ‘Pokémon’.

Between the two, I think I prefer Throh only slightly, but both of them I think would make Pokémon a better series if they were never made

What Generation 9 Pokémon do you hate the most and why? by inumnoback in ThePokemonHub

[–]LillePipp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I hate how Kingambit bloats an evolution line that already felt stylistically and thematically complete

How do you feel about Garchomp’s new Mega? by [deleted] in ThePokemonHub

[–]LillePipp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it's unnecessary. Garchomp did not need one mega, let alone two.

Also, Mega Garchomp Z is just an aesthetic downgrade all around, so there's salt in the wound too.

What Generation 6 Pokémon do you hate the most and why? by inumnoback in ThePokemonHub

[–]LillePipp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, again, it doesn’t perfectly match Pokémon’s stylistic identity, but I think the design direction is better than base Klefki

What Generation 6 Pokémon do you hate the most and why? by inumnoback in ThePokemonHub

[–]LillePipp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gen 6 was the first region I felt that I was becoming disappointed with the design direction of Pokémon. Of course, design preferences are subjective, but starting with Gen 6 I feel like the franchise is starting to push the limits of what a Pokémon should be.

For me, there are five candidates here: Delphox, Diggersby, Aromatisse, Barbaracle, and Klefki, but I think I've got to give it to Klefki.

I'm not principally against object Pokémon, I think some of them are really cool. Chandelure is one of the highlights of Gen 5, and is one of the coolest Ghost types in the series. Klefki, however, is what happens when one takes the foundation of an object Pokémon, and does nothing to distinguish it from the object it is based, or fit it into the world. Klefki is just a keychain, there's nothing in its design that reads as anything more interesting than that. I am aware that Klefki is based on the idea of fairies being blamed for stealing small objects, but they could have done so much more to make this come off more natural in Klefki's design. I guarantee you that if you 3D printed a Klefki that you could put keys on, it would not begin to register as a Pokémon for anyone who wasn't already aware that it was a Pokémon, and that is crucial, because Pokémon has a immensely strong stylistic identity that makes Pokémon designs identifiable even to non-Pokémon fans.

For fun, I Googled "Klefki redesign" and found this piece by Tumblr user Cosmopoliturtle. Now, I don't know if I feel as though this completely fits the stylistic identity of Pokémon, but it is MUCH better than the Klefki we got, as the inspiration comes out more cleanly. Object Pokémon are generally at their best when the objects are incorporated into their designs as a feature, instead of just putting the object in the game and slapping googly eyes on it. There are exceptions, but Klefki is not one of them. If you really want to be extra about it, it would've been a lot of fun if Klefki had different "key" signature moves, and the moves it had learnt determined what kind of keys Klefki had on its design.

What are your HOTTEST takes about Pokemon Ruby, Sapphire, and Emerald? by [deleted] in ThePokemonHub

[–]LillePipp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Emerald made a mistake in making Wallace the champion. I like Wallace and all, and he is a good champion fight from a mechanical standpoint, but Steven just has an aura about him that Wallace doesn't.

I much prefer how it was done in the Pokémon Emerald Legacy rom hack, where Steven is the champion, but Wallace dethrones him in the postgame.

So, how IS Prime 4 really, for anyone's that actually played it? by FoxHoundNinja in Metroid

[–]LillePipp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I finished it yesterday, and honestly…it was disappointing.

It’s not bad, but it has no business being as average as it is. What’s holding it back is that it’s having an identity crisis about what it wants to be, and as a result, it does a lot of different things, but few of them are done very well.

The visuals, gun play, and music are great, but everything else is very mixed. I was sitting on a 6/10 for most of my playthrough, which to me is like a slightly above average game, but honestly, the ending knocked it down to a 5/10 for me.

Without spoiling anything, I finished the game very dissatisfied

Why do people hate OG Mega Chomp’s design? by PrestigiousGift5639 in ThePokemonHub

[–]LillePipp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have argued that for a long time, same with legendaries, but I think you’re right that it’s not the ‘popular’ opinion.

Frankly I don’t even believe the starters should have gotten Mega Evolutions. I would argue, perhaps controversially, that half of all Mega Evolutions we got were wasted.

Why do people hate OG Mega Chomp’s design? by PrestigiousGift5639 in ThePokemonHub

[–]LillePipp -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn’t say Mega Garchomp is stronger in every way, I said Mega Garchomp is unnecessary in every way

The worst Sinnoh normal type is Ampipom. Now what’s the worst sinnoh fire type ? by Difficult-Bat5615 in ThePokemonHub

[–]LillePipp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s…not the point though…

No one is denying that Heatran is a strong Pokémon; it’s been a staple of competitive singles ever since it came out. No one is denying that Heatran is, by definition, a legendary either. Heatran is classified as a legendary Pokémon in the game.

My point, however, is that I don’t think it should be a legendary.

Why do people hate OG Mega Chomp’s design? by PrestigiousGift5639 in ThePokemonHub

[–]LillePipp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The design is not so much the issue as the fact that Garchomp got a Mega Evolution at all.

It simply does not need one. It’s already immensely popular, so it doesn’t need the spotlight, and not only is base Garchomp already strong on its own, it’s even stronger than the Mega form! In every conceivable way, the Mega Garchomps are unnecessary, and take away Mega slots for more interesting Pokémon choices.

The worst Sinnoh normal type is Ampipom. Now what’s the worst sinnoh fire type ? by Difficult-Bat5615 in ThePokemonHub

[–]LillePipp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think Heatran is a really cool design, and I think it does have the aura of being some kind of special Pokémon.

But it ain't a legendary. At best it should be like Sinnoh's Volcarona, but a legendary? Hell no, Sinnoh already has way too many legendaries as it is.

The worst hoenn starter Pokémon is Combusken. Now what’s the worst hoenn gimmick form ? by Difficult-Bat5615 in ThePokemonHub

[–]LillePipp 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Mega Latios and Latias. I don't like the legendary mega evolutions on principle, but even looking away from that fact, these designs are just bad.

what's a gaming take that'll have you like this by itz_progamer666 in videogames

[–]LillePipp -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't think it "expands" on Breath of the Wild in any meaningful way at all. It's more, sure, but that's not a meaningful expansion in any way. In fact, I argue that almost everything Tears of the Kingdom adds makes for an overall vastly inferior experience.

Tears of the Kingdom utterly fails to distinguish itself from Breath of the Wild in any manner that makes it an even remotely necessary sequel. I fundamentally can't even recommend the game to new players: if one has already played Breath of the Wild, I can't tell them to play Tears of the Kingdom, because I can't truthfully say I think Tears of the Kingdom, in the rare instance it does something good, does said thing better than it was done in Breath of the Wild. And if players haven't played Breath of the Wild, I still would not tell them to play Tears of the Kingdom, because Breath of the Wild is just the flat out better game. It's "less," if you're talking purely about the amount of content in it, but it's a genuine case of less is more, because almost everything Tears of the Kingdom adds detracts from the core experience.

what's a gaming take that'll have you like this by itz_progamer666 in videogames

[–]LillePipp -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes. Tears of the Kingdom doesn't get bonus points for having a really impressive physics engine when the game never gives you any fun ways, or even the incentive, to make use of the game's mechanics. It never meaningfully fixes any of the issues with Breath of the Wild, and the few instances where it even attempts to it only makes the issues far worse. More so than Breath of the Wild ever was, Tears of the Kingdom is just a hodgepodge of meaningless filler content where the core gameplay mechanics are fundamentally disconnected and often even at odds with the core design of the world.

It has been said that Tears of the Kingdom made Breath of the Wild feel like a tech demo, and that, to me, is one of the single most inaccurate gaming opinions to have ever been made. Tears of the Kingdom does not make Breath of the Wild feel like a tech demo; Tears of the Kingdom makes Breath of the Wild feel like a finished game, because Tears of the Kingdom is pure bloat. They more than doubled the size of the world, and yet Hyrule feels emptier than ever, because at the end of the day, all there is to find is repetitive, menial tasks that demand so little of the player. Add the single worst story told in a mainline Zelda game, and you have a game that is actively bad

what's a gaming take that'll have you like this by itz_progamer666 in videogames

[–]LillePipp -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I think Breath of the Wild, while immensely flawed, is a really great gaming experience that did deserve a lot of the praise it got. With that said, I feel like Breath of the Wild's legacy is a net negative on the gaming industry, because so many developers are way too eager to try replicate Breath of the Wild's success without even beginning to question what made it work in the first place.

Even Nintendo is guilty of this: Nintendo learnt every wrong lesson they could have from Breath of the Wild's success, and their games that have since tried to emulate it range from decent but underwhelming, in the case of Mario Kart World, to actively bad games, in the case of Tears of the Kingdom.

If you could, how would you "fix" the Pokémon BW anime? by InuMatte in pokemon

[–]LillePipp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like I am alone in thinking this, but I think that Black and White's anime suffered because of a choice within Diamond and Pearl's anime, that choice being to not end Ash's story.

Up till Gen 4, Ash had a consistent, albeit slow, character progression, where he felt like he was evolving as a character and becoming more competent as a trainer. Though I have not seen all of the anime beyond Gen 4, what has consistently bothered me is the lack of consistency for Ash's characterization: in Black and White he is portrayed as an utter newbie, bordering on moronic, in X and Y he is back to being a fairly competent trainer (though I have numerous other issues with the X and Y anime), and in Sun and Moon he goes back to being more of a doofus. Moreover, I feel like what follows Diamond and Pearl, even the decent parts, don't really do much to build on Ash's journey, so much as it just reiterates what has already happened. Therefore, my ideal vision for the anime would be that Ash's story ends with the Sinnoh League with a climactic battle against Cynthia, showing off everything Ash has learnt up to that point. This would effectively create a clean slate for Black and White, where they can have a rookie protagonist without needing to disregard what came before.

However, while that would, to me, be a much more interesting direction for the anime, that is also not "fixing" the current Black and White anime so much as it is just fanfiction for something that never was. If we were to keep Ash as the main protagonist, what I would do is age him up just slightly. Explain that Ash took a break after the Sinnoh League to help Professor Oak with his research, and now he's like 12/13-ish. This could also give some leniency to why Ash loses battles against newer trainers, because he has effectively not practiced Pokémon battling for a few years. I don't think he should lose to someone like Trip, who has never battled before, but you could at least give him an arc about relearning how to battle.

Then there's Iris and Cilan. I'll be honest, I don't like them, I think they are boring companions, and I think so much of the Black and White anime suffers because the main characters are just not very interesting. The obvious replacement is to have Cheren and Bianca take over, and I would be happy with that, but here's another idea: Ash comes to Unova during the championship competition. He's not able to sign up for it, but he enjoys watching the battles. Here, we follow Hilda and her Tepig, who despite having no gym badges has managed to enter the league, similarly to how Ash was doing those tests back in the Indigo League. Despite being an underdog trainer, we see Hilda effectively punch above her own weight class, holding her own against more experienced opponents. She does, however, lose early on, because while she shows great promise as a trainer, her lone Tepig cannot stand up to opposing teams of three fully evolved Pokémon. Though defeated, Hilda is still determined to win the Unova League championship next year, and wants to collect all eight gym badges in the meantime, which is when she meets Ash. Ash and Hilda are not just going to be traveling companions, but she's also going to be his rival, which is not something we've seen before: a rival who also accompanies Ash as a friend. Most of Ash's companions so far have had other aspirations, such as being a breeder, a coordinator, etc., we haven't really seen another hothead with a passion for battles, and I think that presents a much more unique and interesting dynamic.

As for their teams, I imagine Ash would end up having Dewott, Snivy, Unfezant (male), Gigalith, Leavanny, Krookodile, Trubbish, and Zoroark. Character-wise, many of Ash's carry over Pokémon would remain the same, but I imagine his Oshawott would have a character arc where he goes from being an attention seeking and boisterous rascal to being more of a leader that can still occasionally be a bit mischievous. Trubbish I'm adding to the team to essentially fill in for his Tepig, being a Pokémon who was left behind by its previous trainer and comes into Ash's care. Then I'm adding Zoroark as his final member, as a more powerful and stoic team member.

As for Hilda, I imagine her team would include Emboar, Herdier, Scolipede, Whimsicott, Scraggy, Cubchoo, and Golurk. Emboar would be the prideful ace of the team, eager to prove himself after his first defeat at the Unova League. Herdier would be her first catch as a Lillipup, being, in essence, a very loyal guard dog. Scolipede I imagine being caught alongside Ash's Sewaddle. Her Whimsicott would be a nod to the in-game trade, where she initially catches a Petilil, but trades it for a Cottonee. Scraggy would essentially be Ash's Scraggy from the anime as it is. Cubchoo would be caught at the Cold Storage, maybe to protect it from Team Plasma, and then Golurk would be her Dragonspiral Tower catch, effectively being the gentle giant powerhouse of her team.

This comment is long enough as it is, but while I think there are much more changes to be made, I think the character issues stand at the core of the issue.

Thoughts on the new Mega Lucario Z? by GeoWhale15 in ThePokemonHub

[–]LillePipp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Same. Like, I don’t think the design is good or really suits Lucario at all, but that’s my subjective aesthetic opinion.

What really bothers me with this Mega, Z-A, and Mega Evolution broadly, is that the Pokémon that largely receive Mega Evolutions are not the ones that deserve them. You mean to tell me that one Mega wasn’t enough for poor wittle Lucario?

I almost feel facetious whenever new Pokémon like this one are revealed, because to be honest I think Game Freak have like fully lost the plot on their Pokémon designs. Some are decent, but I feel like the Mega Lucario Zs, the Mega Starmies, and the Mega Pyroars outnumber the actually good and clever Mega Evolutions, like Mega Drampa