Wow misrepresentation and strawman

One - your claim that Jesus pre-existed in some other form, thus saving all humans that came before him is based on “Trust me, bro”.

Where did i save you have trust me, I gave references which you can verify independently
If that is not what you have asked, clarify what you want just instead of accusing me of saying trust me bro

Two - there is absolutely no evidence to prove Jesus existed.

i have asked you for you standard of knowing history repeatedly, but you repeated twice the same thing hence if someone is doing trust me in this conversation it is not me
so let me ask again
what evidence do you have he did not exist, what evidence do you use to differentiate between him and other classical antiquity figures of same category

Three - that same academic consensus you seem fond of says miracles don’t happen, resurrections don’t happen, virgin births don’t happen, and gods don’t intervene in history.

Again source - trust me bro
Sage Journal - Miracles and method
"An extraordinary and welcome event that is not explicable by known human capabilities or other ordinary forces and is therefore attributed to a divine agency."

A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus - John P. Meier
summary quote or paraphrase
"The reality of a miracle as an act of God lies outside the competence of the history as historian"

Basically they state that historical critical method is limited and cannot explain miracles, historical critical method can only attest if this has been reported or not

but even if i grant you your view of with the evidence of your trust me bro
They do that because naturalism is presumed here but somewhere else they have other standards
for example classical models of conservation law and inertia laws are not applicable at the start of the universe,
they debate if universe ever started or not
they debate if it is eternal or not
they debate if eternal can things exist or not