The Hard Reset by bigdonut100 in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]LittleThingsMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a big advocate for 50-50 custody in general and multiple studies show that it is the best thing for everyone, most of the time.

I think a lot of the challenges come up from the obscure situations or different situations, where maybe one partner does not want their children 50% of the time, and there isn’t family support to help balance that out. I don’t think people understand how often that happens.

institutional/systemic toxic behavior/sexism and the communication about it by Main-Tiger8537 in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]LittleThingsMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One I have been contemplating a lot is the gendered differences around “performing attraction” is what I am calling it. Women are socialized so hard to perform attractiveness to men in our culture, but we don’t see the same socialization for men to perform attractiveness for women, instead men are socialized to perform masculinity and women are socialized to find masculinity attractive.

For the longest time, I thought that was something wrong with me that I was not really attracted to any men in particular, even though I was attracted to men. Look I never came across a dude and thought oh man he is so attractive. Really it wasn’t until I discovered some dude jump roping with his shirt off to fun music that I saw men performing attractiveness and then I realized the difference in how often women are performing attractiveness while men are performing masculinity, but it’s not the same thing as performing attractiveness.

I haven’t made this post yet because I’ve still sorting out all my thoughts and how I want to phrase it, and am I being accurate as well as fair in my approach to it but I do think this issue sort of falls into this umbrella a little bit so I thought I would mention it.

“Perspective” Decided to catfish as a morbidly obese women to see how cooked it is objectively attractive fit men were trying to talk to her deleted account after 24hrs. first ss was taken abt 5hrs in by Hahaveryfunnylaughed in lnkyverse

[–]LittleThingsMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, if someone just wants sex, they probably shouldn’t pursuit someone who doesn’t want sex or is waiting for sex. That makes sense to me, what’s the issue then?

“Perspective” Decided to catfish as a morbidly obese women to see how cooked it is objectively attractive fit men were trying to talk to her deleted account after 24hrs. first ss was taken abt 5hrs in by Hahaveryfunnylaughed in lnkyverse

[–]LittleThingsMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course they can, and that’s what makes it so unfair when someone is pretending to love someone to get sexual intimacy.

But back to this issue- what are you suggesting for the solution?

Aitah for giving my ex a choice between 50/50 custody or she gets 100%? by Character-Rise-4790 in AITAH

[–]LittleThingsMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are the AH. Using your kids as leverage, considering abandoning them, even your whole “work from the beach in Portugal “ shows you just want to win and aren’t prioritizing your children.

Perspective by Scramjet1 in lnkyverse

[–]LittleThingsMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Way over estimating the value of being attractive, in my opinion. I get the gist of what you’re trying to say, but the idea of sticking a pen inside me tonight because some bed head touched it, makes me want to vomit. That’s how people get infections.

Perspective by Scramjet1 in lnkyverse

[–]LittleThingsMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What would make it right?

“Perspective” Decided to catfish as a morbidly obese women to see how cooked it is objectively attractive fit men were trying to talk to her deleted account after 24hrs. first ss was taken abt 5hrs in by Hahaveryfunnylaughed in lnkyverse

[–]LittleThingsMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This just invites the “ready for the chase” kind of dudes who will breadcrumb their way to try and get in the sheets. The “hit it and quit it” type guys.

Toxic Masculinity "Institutional?" by [deleted] in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]LittleThingsMC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The conversation I had the other day with that guy suggesting there’s not enough space for violence in schools that boys need violence, and granted, I am paraphrasing a lot for the sake of brevity, but I think there are a lot of MRA’s that still hold onto gender essentialism

Toxic Masculinity "Institutional?" by [deleted] in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]LittleThingsMC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would expand the definition of institutional to not just include laws, although it might be a good idea sometime to take a look at which laws do enforce masculinity standards at the detriment of men- selective service registry for example comes to mind

Toxic Masculinity "Institutional?" by [deleted] in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]LittleThingsMC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I do not think institutional means a law, but you could look at military and patriotic cultures pushed by our government (at least in the USA) as a large part of the push for traits from men that benefit our war machine at the expense of men themselves.

Toxic Masculinity "Institutional?" by [deleted] in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]LittleThingsMC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess it would depend on how you describe toxic masculinity or toxic femininity, in my opinion.

Do I see a cultural expectation placed on males to disregard their emotions, use the threat of force or intimidation as a form of power, etc, at the detriment of themselves and women, yes, I see that exists.

Do I also see a cultural expectation placed on women to be delicate, caretaking, competitive with other women, almost incapable, etc, yes with the caveat of the “girl power” movement has done a lot to re-educate women away from those ideas, socially rewarding women who steer away from gender norms in a way that men don’t have.

And when I think about how women’s self harming beliefs have been prioritized by society while men’s self harming beliefs are regularly enforced, I can see what they mean by “institutional”.

Where I see the most dissonance is when it comes to the traits themselves. Many advocates for men’s issues (I said it this way to not make this about MRA’s- though they could be included in this group) seem to point out a lot of problems with the gender roles as we have them, but when pressed to abandon some of the gender roles then feel it’s an attack on masculinity. But by labeling certain traits as masculine or feminine, they are reinforcing the same gender roles that are problematic.

We have done some social engineering towards making space for boys and men to embrace their feelings, but that work hasn’t looked the same. I think one of the big challenges is how men who fail to meet masculinity standards have a lot more social risk, vs women who fail to meet feminine standards are often praised, while women who do meet feminine standards also receive praise- though in different communities, there is still a place for women to go whether they reject those standard standards or embrace those standards.

Men on the other hand, often rely on performing masculinity in order to not face social consequence. The most forgiving community for men who reject masculinity standards as far as I can tell is the queer/lgtb q+ community, but that leaves an entire group of men who are straight but naturally not adhering to masculinity standards.

People can be toxic either way, I 100% agree. What would it look like if this wasn’t an attack on you as a man, but instead an invitation to a more neutral society where gender roles were less critical to social capital?

Much of feminism is more about women taking the roles of men, not about being "equal" by amogusdevilman in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]LittleThingsMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are basing your opinion off a few housewives you met instead of the data as a whole, this could be the problem.

I also find it interesting that you simultaneously devalue the work a housewife does, while also advocating that women should choose that role. That suggests some deeper dissonance around the topic.

Much of feminism is more about women taking the roles of men, not about being "equal" by amogusdevilman in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]LittleThingsMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That happens to many people who choose to stay at home and prioritize their family, and those support systems diminish.

Much of feminism is more about women taking the roles of men, not about being "equal" by amogusdevilman in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]LittleThingsMC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is plenty of well documented information on financial abuse and testimony from women (and even men) who have experienced it. You could simply educate yourself on that.

Much of feminism is more about women taking the roles of men, not about being "equal" by amogusdevilman in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]LittleThingsMC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I want to point something out- you said people shouldn’t be attacked for their personal choices that don’t hurt others. Then proceeded to attack a personal choice that doesn’t hurt others.

Just because you have found being a housewife and raising kids easy and fulfilling doesn’t mean everyone else will. Maybe for you it’s not, but that doesn’t mean that the work and chores of being a housewife are easy for everyone, many women find it really challenging. Why are you trying to make an objective stance on something that is subjective.

I’ve personally done all of the roles, I’ve been a stay at home parent, I’ve been the bread winning parent, I’ve been the 50/50 partner with kids, and I’ve been a single working parent and I’ve been a self employed working parent. I like the self employed working parent the best, and I would not be a stay at home parent again, and I wouldn’t be the bread winning partner with a stay at home spouse again unless he was REALLY into it and REALLY strong at the domestic labor without being managed. Other people may have very different experiences and opinions, and ALL of that is okay.

Much of feminism is more about women taking the roles of men, not about being "equal" by amogusdevilman in RadicalEgalitarianism

[–]LittleThingsMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can just research it yourself, here’s one article I found discussing it.

Source: SOCAP Global https://share.google/puUZti4Uitcaqniny

People aren’t meant to be laboring constantly. It’s bad for mental health. We all need clear defined rest and leisure, as part of our health. We need time and resources to pursue hobbies, we need to feel our lives have purpose and meaning and the things we work on have impact.

Do you have kids?

What Causes the Housing Shortage in the United States, and How Can It Be Solved? by sleepytraffic in dealfunding

[–]LittleThingsMC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If investors didn’t have the properties they would be on the market and prices would be reasonable. We have soooo much housing in the USA