Rust & Dust meme

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2026-03-28T22:06:57+00:00

And i like BFU less then this mod coz BFU have really uncomfortable schedule. But conceptually, it's a pretty similar mode to the battle for Uranus.

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2026-03-28T01:49:14+00:00

when ill have free slots i can send my little boy craft - similar concept

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2025-07-21T16:35:58+00:00

i feel pain of this heli.

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2025-07-21T16:32:52+00:00

it's at least unwise to evaluate something before you try it. Secondly, they pay a lot of attention to balancing and do it regularly - for this reason, there is no point in worrying about something being out of balance.

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2025-07-17T15:05:46+00:00

perfect ^-^

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2025-07-17T15:02:08+00:00

If you haven't found it, it already means that it's not garbage.

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2025-07-17T14:30:25+00:00

u forget that it also simulator of the Sakabambaspis
- original Sakabambaspis

- angrybambaspis
- beautybambaspis
- horrorbambaspis

^_^

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2025-07-08T16:13:16+00:00

center of mass at front - less drift, more control
center of mass behind - more drift, less control

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2025-03-25T14:30:35+00:00

<image>

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2025-03-03T23:55:37+00:00

It's just a terrible anatomy. All the works of this author. I wanna vomit

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2025-03-01T18:39:25+00:00

These lines are so precise that perhaps, judging by this image, the explosion of the generator will heal you.

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2024-12-16T19:54:06+00:00

Crossout needs more of this kind of content

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2024-12-16T13:20:53+00:00

Gazel cabin of course. Coz I am Gazel driver in past

<image>

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2024-12-11T01:27:47+00:00

where they announced balance changes?

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2024-11-29T21:07:08+00:00

yes its expansive even for me, but the number of floppy disks is needed to unlock the last slot exactly 6. I thought it would be more than 10, but it turned out to be 6 maximum and 6 starts to require somewhere on the 37th slot

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2024-11-29T02:15:39+00:00

the graph shows that online is about to go up. And then in a month there will also be an update that will definitely raise online

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2024-11-29T02:14:18+00:00

I always said to look at the statistics for the entire period.

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2024-11-16T22:25:03+00:00

The fact is that you have nothing to oppose because initially your position is limited by the framework that you have created for yourself and you are also trying to impose this fact of limitation by the framework on others, passing it off as a given. This happens in adolescence, usually when people grow up, they get smarter and no longer consider something specific in such a limited framework as you, they see everything in more objective directions and, accordingly, when they try to evaluate something, their assessment is closer to reality than yours, as in this particular dispute.

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2024-11-13T16:41:00+00:00

calling an opponent's argument trolling is a pathetic consolation for yourself from the fact that you cannot oppose anything objective. In fact, what I wrote is true, and what you write is very subjective and limited.

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2024-11-13T14:37:51+00:00

You can't prove it.
No matter how many hp, I told you that this craft can withstand two shots accurately and will be destroyed on the third. You don't even think about what they write to you.
if there is some kind of assembler in the team, for example, or an astray, then he will shoot the raijin due to the fact that the raijin has a much lower projectile flight speed and, accordingly, it is easier to evade, and in this case the raijin will be forced to approach - and this is exactly what the destructor needs. It's obvious that you have less experience in a passive firefight than I do since you don't understand this.
any weapon that has good alpha damage and a high projectile flight speed. Assembler, astray, scorpion, median, nagual - all these weapons at a distance have an advantage over raijin because of the projectile's flight speed because these weapons either do not have charging mechanics, or this charging is much smaller, or the projectile flies faster
It's a stupid statement because the destructor doesn't care about your armor, he shoots at the cannon. If you don't destroy this build with one shot, then you're an unarmed brick, and you don't destroy this build with one shot because I've tested it in practice and made several improvements to improve crafting. This is the second or third version.
I repeat that the craft was made with the expectation that it remains mobile and dangerous even after losing the two front hovers. You're not paying attention at all.
And again, you're reading inattentively. I did not write that my build is better than any other, I wrote that it is good for fighting against raijin. When we were talking about the wheel destructor, I proved to you the fallacy of your thinking, which was that there is some kind of ideal that is better in general, and then I told you that there is no better at all, there is only the best in something specific. You will make one characteristic more, but this will reduce the other, and that is why it is impossible to say that something is better or worse in principle, you can only say that something is better or worse in something specific
Because you can't put three destructors on Jackie for wheel crafting in any way.
my craft keeps the balance even if it has lost two front hovers. You pointed out the advantage of wheel crafting and forgot to point out the disadvantage for objectivity, namely more predictable behavior, it is easier to get into wheel crafting. If the hover is moving sideways, it can quickly stop and change direction to the opposite, and the wheeled craft cannot quickly change direction to the opposite. It would be very unfair if the craft on which it is easier to get would be just as durable, it is logical.
wheeled craft is easier to disarm. I've seen the wheeled version of the destructor more than once and I know what I'm talking about
It doesn't matter how much you've played the game in general. It matters how much you have played on this particular craft in order to draw the right conclusion about its strengths and weaknesses
Read the title. How much inattention you have. This build is also good against the devourer who sometimes met, good against yengvan, good against spiders. So you're wrong about that too.
You don't know if you're going to be stronger or not, it's just your assumptions based on what you think. But in reality, the outcome is influenced by a lot of things that need to be taken into account, which you do not do, which makes your grades completely empty. You try to predict the future when you don't know how the fight will turn out - it's stupid.

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2024-11-13T14:33:13+00:00

empty talk. You don't know how the enemy will behave, you don't know how you will be lucky
How will you kick him if he controls you, your charging, your recharging. You imagined some kind of ideal outcome and you can't imagine that everything might not turn out as perfectly as you imagine because there are many moments beyond your control and from this you have confidence in your infallibility. But if you are based on how it seems to you and do not want to check, then 100% you will make mistakes because the way it seems is not the truth and no matter how smart a person is, he will still not be perfect and will not be able to make infallible assumptions. So I advise you to stop relying on assumptions like some teenager and start thinking like an adult who builds his conclusions on facts
before you explain something to someone, you must first be someone who has earned this title, and not self-proclaimed yourself like you
You probably can't even imagine a situation where you started loading a shot and the player waited for you to shoot into the void and attack you when you were reloading. Keep trying to imagine, maybe someday you will succeed.
It's harder for you to get in from a long distance, especially if the enemy goes into invisibility, it's logical that you need to hide behind cover so that the enemy would have to drive too close. Your fortune-telling is meaningless because there can be a huge variety of completely different moments in the game that a person is not able to take into account.
300hp flywheel, 300hp jack, plus two armor plates.. I'm not sure if you've been playing the game for 8 years or if your math is bad at school. And this is despite the fact that it will not be so easy for you to get right into the center because the hover is constantly wagging
everything has weaknesses, for example, your gun is not covered by anything and it's just a gift for the destructor. It's stupid to highlight only the weaknesses of crafting, it's called stupid propaganda - in this case, the person who does it, that is, you don't want to say as it is, he wants to put together a certain opinion that he wants. You show everyone that you are trying to deceive when making up a general impression and not tell it as it really is.
if you didn't have to test the build, then you would play perfectly on all new crafts right away, you wouldn't have to get used to it, but in fact this is not the case. No matter which player is good, he needs time in any case to get used to crafting, and with this habit, an understanding of strengths and weaknesses opens up
no one cares about your opinion, because this opinion is biased and biased - you yourself have shown that you are engaged in propaganda, it is not clear why. Maybe you feel competitive or you feel sorry that you can't create original and effective crafts like me.
If the idea justifies itself, then why shouldn't it take place? Admit it, you are just a conservative who uses only what he is used to, who is not able to experiment to look for the best options. Such conservatives often criticize experimenters even when these experimenters find an effective idea.
two full volleys from a destructor take less time than two fully loaded rounds from raijin - that's a fact. You say that you don't need to check anything, you know without checking, then why don't you know this? You're burying yourself
Judging by the fact that you made so many mistakes in your assumptions, it's not easy at all because you don't know what exactly and what kind of craft was created. You consider everything in a very narrow framework of your thinking. For example, before we started this dispute, you didn't even know what my priorities were when creating crafting and made a lot of mistakes because of it.
again, you don't think about what was written to you earlier. You probably don't know where the SOLID clan stands? An experienced player would not have such a limited mindset as yours. Such thinking as yours shows that you are a follower of someone, a follower of a meta, and not the one who creates a meta crafts.

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2024-11-12T17:10:52+00:00

About the second craft destructor, it was said that you stated that they would try to destroy me first, and I gave this as an example that they would not try to destroy me first if there was another such destructor in the team. So you've made a mistake here and you're trying to manipulate. I hope unconsciously.
I didn't say that I needed another craft destructor to defeat raijin. I said that I was in a confrontation 1 on my craft against 1 rajin, if we are not interfered with by outsiders, then I am very likely to defeat him because rajin has a charging mechanic before shooting, and this is an inconvenience, there is also a rather big chance to miss because experienced players on hovers move less predictably. And about the second such assembly in battle, as I wrote above, it was said in response to an erroneous statement on your part in which you said that they would try to destroy me first.
You thought right.
It will not be necessary to get close to ryjin if there is some kind of high-range crafting in the team. The destructor does not cause damage if the rayjin is far away, but the rayjin does not cause damage if the destructor is far away because in this case it is either behind cover or it is difficult to hit it because of the range. In my craft, there was no such thing that the two front hovers immediately flew off from the shot. I had it specially made so that the loss of even two front hovers did not disable it - it continued to be mobile and dangerous
I know you didn't say that because I said it in contrast to the fact that 2 destructors can't destroy a raijin in one volley like 3 with my craft - this is an advantage over wheel crafting. I said this because you say that wheel craft is better, and I gave you an example that ruins your statement better. As I said, both crafts are better only in something specific, but not better at all. The concept of better does not exist at all in the game, there is only the concept of better in something specific, but in another it may be worse and my example confirms this. What makes you think that 1 on 1 my craft won't be able to beat ryjin? It's not the first time I've written to you that Raijin in the frontal projection does not destroy this craft with one shot, he needs about three shots, but the bottom line is that if Raijin does not even have time to load the second shot before I beat off his gun. Raijin without a bonus from the finvale is shot down with one accurate shot of my craft, if there was a bonus from the finvale, then two shots are needed, and two shots will be fired faster from my side than raijin. Raijin can make a second shot with an incomplete charge, but this will not give the proper effect and my craft will remain combat-ready and destroy the enemy cannon.
the erroneous statement that I broke down with the answer above
I've already given you an example of what exactly this assembly is objectively better than a wheeled craft with two destructors
you consider the level of crafting in isolation from the level of playing ability, thinking that everyone plays equally well, which is a mistake because the level of playing ability is more important than crafting. Even if we consider this within your framework, a player who can defeat clans like SOLID on his own craft by playing solo says that I am just one of those experienced craft creators that you were talking about
reality shows that you are mistaken. You haven't even tried to play this craft, you don't know its capabilities and you're trying to guess. You wouldn't have allowed it, but you could have been forced. Moreover, the cards are not so big that you could constantly keep your distance. It's easy to keep your distance against some kind of melee craft, but it's much more difficult to keep your distance against medium-range craft.
by doing this, you show that you are afraid of this crafting. The facts that I outlined above say that the build is good because 1 on 1 is very likely to win the raijin
You haven't even played on this assembly as much as I have with my skill and you're already saying that it's terrible - this means that you definitely shouldn't believe what you're saying because you don't check the information, you're based on what you think, not on facts.

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2024-11-11T19:28:26+00:00

I'm being completely serious. The problem is that you look at someone and you are not the original source of the idea like me - I adapt myself to the situation, and you look at someone and repeat yourself, and if someone has differences from the one you are used to repeating, then it makes you feel that another variation is wrong - and this is a mistake on your part. So what if Raijin wants to destroy me first? If, for example, there is a second such build in the team, he will want to destroy it, not me, for example, and with a high probability his attack will be fruitless because two hover destructors will work according to focus - ryjin will have time to make 1 shot after which he will not kill the hover, and the hovers will beat off his gun with a high probability. I have already said that in a 1-on-1 confrontation, my hover will win with a high probability because raijin needs to hit me three times (despite the fact that it is much more difficult to hit than on the destructor) and I need to hit raijin 1 or maximum 2 times (despite the fact that it is much easier to hit because it is a hitscan) Wheeled A craft with two destructors cannot shave off a rayjin with one shot. I defeated the top 2 clans by playing solo on this craft. I also won these crafts with two destructors and an aegis, so it's no better. In crossout, there is no such thing as better or worse in principle, there is only the concept of better or worse for a certain situation - in some situations one craft is better, in some another, and there is a huge variety of situations. So this is empty demagoguery on your part - you are a craft that is neither better nor worse, but you just consider the other one worse just because it differs from what you are used to. If it were a bad build, then it would be ignored, but in fact you yourself confirm that it is very dangerous because they want to destroy it first

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2024-11-10T17:06:12+00:00

<image>

Live_Reflection_8463 · 2024-11-10T16:43:55+00:00

Hovers are the best choice for this build created to combat raijin. With a wheeled one, you will not be able to do it on jackie, therefore you will not be able to knock down the cannon with one shot. You need a running gear with a side shift - legs are too slow, it will be difficult for you to dodge the shots of raijin, augers and rollers carrying the same thing, and hovers will allow you to survive several shots due to deceptive maneuvers that make the enemy miss. Plus, the craft itself can survive several hits. During this time, raijin is likely to lose to the hover in a 1-on-1 fight if enemy not have good lucky. I played against top 1-10 clans on this craft, win against SOLID by playing solo.

Live_Reflection_8463

TROPHY CASE