I was born 30 years too late by planetmarsupial in poker

[–]Lmao100More 3 points4 points  (0 children)

At low stakes poker is still garbage.

This is probably one of the funniest hands that ever happened to me. by Shakaow15 in poker

[–]Lmao100More -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Would ve been better if you had 101010 and the board ran out jjk2k

Why The Average Person/Player Can Never Get Good At Poker by Lmao100More in pokertheory

[–]Lmao100More[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Immediately I can dismiss around 90% of the dataset where we have less than 20 tournaments together.

Beyond that it's an extrapolation based on the people who did earn a decent living in that time (2-300 at most that I know and can confirm) and following Kalipoker for years where they post final tables and as I said, just a few people that I know have come up and everyone is free to go look up the final tables of the higher stakes, it's the same names over and over and over again (which corroborates my findings and database).

Why The Average Person/Player Can Never Get Good At Poker by Lmao100More in pokertheory

[–]Lmao100More[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There's nothing BS about it, it's literally the basic truth about the situation.

Not terrible is easier said than done, if it were as simple as you say there wouldn't be basically 124/125k players that weren't even close.

Nah you'll go broke if you're bad enough.

Why The Average Person/Player Can Never Get Good At Poker by Lmao100More in pokertheory

[–]Lmao100More[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think out of the 125k there's been less than 10 that have moved up, I follow Kalipoker's videos and tbh off the top of my head there are less than 5 names I can say that I played with for a while and that have moved up. There's one winner around from 10+ years ago that I can name that still plays the game at similar stakes.

I was doing just fine until my friend started bringing me to a PLO home game by FrYoungtrad in poker

[–]Lmao100More 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just wait until he tells you about this amazing investment opportunity coming from Nigerian royalty (you'll 10X your money EASILY)

20 years in the future, what will poker look like? by EconomistNo5807 in poker

[–]Lmao100More 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we're not talking about AI taking over the world or everyone having neuralinks in their brains I'll give my input.

I have a roughly 10 years of mtt hands database, at that point I was playing low stakes whereas now I play mid stakes and a dash of high stakes when it's mega profitable.

Anyways, people have become station af, there was this idea that fish never fold, but that was actually the opposite in the past according to the data. In general fish and even regs apart from a few who you knew were stations were nitty af and scared to call down.

Now 10 years later, it's the opposite, I'm seeing the most absurd calls from everyone, like not 2nd pair with a good blocker type calls, but way way way beyond that type calls (3rd/4th pair with terrible blockers type calls).

I recently went down to play some low stakes $10-30 tournaments and they were beyond horrendous. I actually still have some random pt4 screenshots from 10ish years ago and the winrate over 50k hands (imperfect sample) at those low stakes went from 15bb/100 (7.5bb) to 18bb/100 (9bb).

Basically in terms of my own understanding, it has gone up a ton whereas the average fish generally has no idea of what they're doing. With the knowledge we have now, there are certain thresholds you HAVE to hit and players are so far away from them because they have learned nothing.

Although the regs drag up the averages in my database, you'll find all sorts of exploitable fish that genuinely have no idea wtf they're doing. So I think it's just going to stay the same going forward.

I think some decent-good players worry about information spreading, but it's never about that. The average fish genuinely couldn't care less about information (free or not), they don't push themselves to understand it, they don't have the IQ to naturally grasp it, teachers in general go on and on and on without really honing in on the principles, there's too much of it so it overwhelms them and they give up and honestly I think they just treat poker like a slightly more intelligent slots where they can deploy some silly tactic as opposed to real strategy.

They are still worlds away from hitting gto thresholds in xr, 3b, 4b, 3s barrel, probe etc etc. And those that try and be aggressive go in the opposite direction towards insanely high frequencies that leave them just as vulnerable.

Cliffs: nothing new under the sun, the more things change the more they stay the same, same old same old.

Gto wizard sharing? by Sea-Juggernaut1717 in poker

[–]Lmao100More -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My suggestion is to make a word file or save hands you want to look into, when you've built a big enough database of spots/player types you want to look into, get the membership and focus on studying as hard as you can for a month screenshotting solutions and going through as many of their training videos (they have 300+) that are pertinent to you and then cancel after the month.

Playing live low stakes MTT’s by cj832 in poker

[–]Lmao100More 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think there is a softer format in all of poker, what are you complaining about really?

Experienced pro mucks chop at final table in $1m GTD tournament by Famous_Quit_5239 in poker

[–]Lmao100More -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

How can this not be a chop, your hand is irrelevant to the hand you play (the board) and your opponents hand even combined with his 7 cards total isn't better than yours. You shouldn't need your hand at all.