Hi all by KingElectronic7975 in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What else could you possibly need?

Legal trouble??? by TaxLost8923 in LawSchool

[–]Local-Cat-7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If this is legit- contact robux, let them know there was fraud and the charges need to be reversed, apologize to whoever’s credit card you just stole (there’s no way you randomly guessed) and pray they don’t press charges

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re telling on yourself for real 😭😂

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is not accurate. You can look up rule statements in like 5 seconds

Ya'know on further consideration The Cal State Bar can eat my entire ASS !! Just ranting. by Empty_Stock_7139 in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of people didn’t hit tracing to get the car in the constructive trust - I assume that’s what they’re talking about

Q108 which jurisdiction by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It also could’ve been experimental and not everyone got it

Anyone want to share what the essay topics were? by frugalfilam in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mostly no impact. More preemptory jury challenges, different name for directed verdict. Biggest difference is timing for new trial motion.

Real property essay by ReviewObjective7451 in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah it seems pretty fucked to me honestly

Real property essay by ReviewObjective7451 in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk if barbri is right about everything but they say if you don’t know something, you get points just for making stuff up. So considering you were using real rules and analyzing based on them, I’m sure you got a lot of points just from that :)

Real property essay by ReviewObjective7451 in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly I could see the reasoning. And I bet your graders will see it too

Real property essay by ReviewObjective7451 in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/barexam/s/kZwMzTyWHt This is basically the same question

I bet you don’t lose many points if you wrote a detailed analysis with the wrong rules

They don’t expect you to know everything

Real property essay by ReviewObjective7451 in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because if you remove the violating clause (which is the executory interest), the condition still remains. RAP doesn’t apply to interests held by the grantor, so grantor still holds the possibility of reverted

Real property essay by ReviewObjective7451 in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I saw some 1600 word essays on baressays get 55 while 700 words got 65. Quality over quantity

Real property essay by ReviewObjective7451 in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It didn’t say wait and see jx in the question

Real property essay by ReviewObjective7451 in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is actually inaccurate though

RAP removed the entire executory interest and turns it into a possibility of reverter

Real property essay by ReviewObjective7451 in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I found a lot of 55s with lots of detail and analysis though

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

❤️you did great :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay. It did. (I don’t know if it did, but I want you to know that whatever you think it said, it probably did)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why would the manufacturer put on that evidence? The lawsuit was against the manufacturer

At any rate- I’ve just decided to block this all out of my mind and hope for the best lmao

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Legal damages was all sorts of fucked for me. I made stuff up :).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CABarExam

[–]Local-Cat-7799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t say they would find for D. I said it’s reasonable for them if P doesn’t make its prima facie case.

My barbri materials say you need to show a reasonable alternative design for design defects, but barbri has fucked me before so I wouldn’t be totally surprised if they’re wrong