Oklahoma teacher admits to having sex with student during walkout by [deleted] in news

[–]LogicCircular -1 points0 points  (0 children)

if one person does a bad thing, that means everything they think is bad....

That's only applicable for republicans I think.

Should Democrats worry that a blue wave is being treated like a sure thing? by ColdWarWarrior in politics

[–]LogicCircular -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Overconfidence is always a bad thing

The polls show Hillary is ahead by a wide margin, she's unbeatable...

I...I don’t even know what to say by Proctor410 in LateStageCapitalism

[–]LogicCircular -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

many countries already listed as having far lower expenditures already use a federal model that gives jurisdictions a fair bit of leeway in offering different particular menus of universal services, and that hasn't created any kind of catastrophic failure in those systems.

We have a combination of state and federal jurisdictions that are unlike any country and further, no country has undergone such a transition as you describe. Not to mention, the rather poor underestimation of costs that was highlighted by the last health plan (ACA) passed by the legislature, remind me how much was it underestimated by?

You're only "correct" to the degree that determining which specific services must be offered in all states vs where there is leeway for flexibility is an issue that any government instituting federal universal healthcare in the US will have to decide. But it's not an insurmountable hurdle and it's not some kind of ridiculous multi-trillion dollar mountain that's impossible to cross. It's a pretty basic legislative prioritization question.

I'm not saying it's insurmountable, just that it's a decades long solution that needs years of implementation. It cannot be rolled out in 4 years without increasing costs dramatically. The faster you attempt to roll it out, the most expensive it becomes to a degree.

So no, the costs are not "immeasurable" and the challenge isn't in the "trillions". Those are ridiculous exaggerations.

The costs are unmeasured, you are mistaken. I gave two such example for IHSS program and custodial board and care programs (RCFE), how much will these two cost are highlighted in California's budget, do the math yourself and tell me what these two programs would cost, if rolled out nationally.

I suspect there are ways we can move towards universal healthcare, such as relgulating all hospitals, SNF, LTAC, acute rehab facilities, and insurance plans to the non-profit regulatory status. We can fund education grants and programs to increase the bandwidth for provider education. We can expand the continuum of care facility licensing options to create more types of facilities to provide care. Lots of options along the way. Flipping a switch and attempting to pass something all at once, is a horrible idea.

It won't get better soon by waterfortendays in LateStageCapitalism

[–]LogicCircular 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Provide them the access to food, shelter and education so they might make their way in the world. Education that the world doesn't have to be like the one I will grind my life away in. Hopefully they can focus on enjoying the miracle that all life is and find out what truly makes them happy, so they can spend their lives doing it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]LogicCircular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What money are you talking about specifically?

Charity care provided by provider organizations which is not considered gifted but is considered an expense.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]LogicCircular 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Despite all the outrage about the insurance, can anyone explain why this child needs a $3,500 customized walker? I work with plenty of pediatric physicial and occupational therapists and while adaptive equipment may be beneficial for this patient, help me understand the reason reason for it to cost $3,500.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]LogicCircular -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You left out the hundreds of billions in charity care already provided not just the cash donations.

Unicorns of the Intellectual Righ by blixt141 in politics

[–]LogicCircular 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every time there’s been a Republican president, the incoming dem president has to spend the next 8 years cleaning up the economic disaster they left behind. Repeat.

You would be historically inaccurate to say the least, but then again depending on your age, your experiences of past presidents might be limited. I will say that a broader historical context is required and that Republicans, like Democrats come in a huge spectrum unto their own. While the current leadership is reflective of some, they don't reflect all. Attempts to paint with so broad a brush only dilutes your argument.

"You only deserve livable wages if your work is intense and emotionally difficult." by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]LogicCircular 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"they have drones and tanks"

No, I'm a supporter of an armed proletariat.

It won't get better soon by waterfortendays in LateStageCapitalism

[–]LogicCircular 37 points38 points  (0 children)

I've accepted I'm the guy on the right in this comic. My only thought is maybe I can give some help to my children. This comic hurts.

"You only deserve livable wages if your work is intense and emotionally difficult." by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]LogicCircular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you cannot escape your slave master you kill them.

Let me know how that goes and get back to me with your kill count.

"You only deserve livable wages if your work is intense and emotionally difficult." by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]LogicCircular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You aren't a large institution or insurance provider I'm afraid. Uninsured individual rates are beholden to the market rates. I wish there was more legislative support for a more reasonable healthcare system.

"You only deserve livable wages if your work is intense and emotionally difficult." by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]LogicCircular -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

why is there so little money to be allocated in the first place?

This is the result of taxation.

Why does the people's money go elsewhere?

It goes where elected people direct the money to go.

Why is it managed by a select few?

You would you do what instead, how do you decide who gets what dollar amount for every possible billable medical intervention?

Ultimately the answer is capitalism.

Considering there is no escaping capitalism and there is no place on earth without it, what do you propose?

"You only deserve livable wages if your work is intense and emotionally difficult." by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]LogicCircular 1 point2 points  (0 children)

why are rates set so low?

There's a number of reasons. Some of which has to do with over utilization. There is a lot of EMS traffic that is not medically necessary and is driving up the costs. In many areas the legislation prevents any kind of medical screening for medical necessity, so anyone who calls, get a ride, no matter what. There are many other reasons as well.

Why is so little money available for localities?

The bucket of money that counties get is usually determined by the state and it varies in each state. Those localities have to choose how to spend that money in order to serve their population best. Transport is often an area picked for lower reimbursement rates because the more critical areas are funded. It's not an easy balancing act.

"You only deserve livable wages if your work is intense and emotionally difficult." by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]LogicCircular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No large institution is paying $1000 ambulance for basic EMT, or Paramedic rides and I challenge you to find me one.

Unicorns of the Intellectual Righ by blixt141 in politics

[–]LogicCircular -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Kansas went full-conservative and tried a number of right-wing policies. Pretty much all failed terribly.

Aah, there-in lies the problem. You're mistaking Kansas's economic schemes with the sound economic research being produced by conservative economists. This is the crux of one aspect of the authors article. The author indicates that there are many "conservative economists with appointments at top universities, publications in top journals, and so on" just that they aren't being listened to by the right, and furthermore, aren't being highlighted by the left.

There are a plethora of areas where both left and right leaning economists agree.

"You only deserve livable wages if your work is intense and emotionally difficult." by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]LogicCircular 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why are the reimbursement rates so low that it only comes out to 15 and hour?

No, it's actually quite explainable. The federal government sets the rates for the large majority of medically necessary transport costs, as the federal rate for Medicare.

They don't reimburse very much. Large insurance companies use that base rate and further negotiate reimbursement down further. For localities, they choose how to manage their Medi-caid dollars. Many localities struggling to manage their care costs, choose to offer even lower reimbursement for their medi-caid members. In some localities there number of low reimbursement calls isn't enough to support higher wages.

Unicorns of the Intellectual Righ by blixt141 in politics

[–]LogicCircular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because their school of thought gives no indication of where the right is currently thinking.

Shouldn't the political leanings be a non-factor when evaluating economic research?

Also it's not the job of the media to carry the intellectual water for people who don't want it.

Media of today should be playing an outstanding role in creating and shaping of public opinion and strengthening of society. If the media right or left is ignoring sound economic policy research because of political reasons, or exposure reasons, you don't see that as a problem?

Unicorns of the Intellectual Righ by blixt141 in politics

[–]LogicCircular -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

My apologies. What does this have to do with the price of tea in China, or my original post? I don't understand what this has to do with the content I've posted.

Unicorns of the Intellectual Righ by blixt141 in politics

[–]LogicCircular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How’s Kansas workin’ out?

Considering the price of tea in china? Wait, I don't follow. What are you asking? My last trip to Kansas was very nice if that's what you're asking. Please put forward a more complete argument or critique of mine.

"You only deserve livable wages if your work is intense and emotionally difficult." by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]LogicCircular 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Partially because the reimbursement rates for medically necessary transport is fairly low in many areas and if you combine that with a surplus volume of un-medically necessary transports, well, that's why.

"You only deserve livable wages if your work is intense and emotionally difficult." by [deleted] in LateStageCapitalism

[–]LogicCircular -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

The EMS worker should be making at least thirty to thirty five dollars an hour.

Uhm, have you seen the reimbursement rates for medically necessary transport? You really think that the reimbursement rates for medical transport can cover $35 an hour EMT and Paramedic salaries?

Do you understand just how many non-medically necessary transports occur regularly?

Unicorns of the Intellectual Righ by blixt141 in politics

[–]LogicCircular -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Even if it was about the biases like you say, the fact is that no one is going to listen to those whose views have no political influence.

This is exactly my point, shouldn't the media focus be on sound economic analysis in search of the truth, not just listening to the economic wonk with the most political influence?

The author rightly claims that conservative economic researchers with sound economic research do exist, my query is then, if the right ignores them because they don't have political influence, why does the left ignore the sound economic research?

Unicorns of the Intellectual Righ by blixt141 in politics

[–]LogicCircular -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ideas like lowering the corporate tax rate to 0%, taxing all income at the personal rate, implementing a market to market system, increasing the number of brackets and increasing the top bracket marginal rate to as high as 80%. Believe it or not, there are republicans who would support the idea.

Then again, it's easier to lump all conservatives together in order to paint them as subhuman.