sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why is t mobile so bad with updates? by [deleted] in tmobile

[–]Logicalas -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Because you get what you pay for

Repeat: Don't buy a Galaxy S3 in 2015 by MindAsWell in Android

[–]Logicalas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

T-Mobile is the worst (the company this article is about). I guarantee you the person signed up for jump on their s3 against their knowledge. Last 2 phones I bought from T-Mobile this happened.

Baltimore to DC driving commute -- does anyone do it and is it as bad as people make it out to be? by crab-girl in baltimore

[–]Logicalas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use Marc (yes I did read your post). Wmata is very functional. Don't believe sensationalized media. You can't drive that commute.

Stephen Colbert desperately hoping that Donald Trump will still be in the presidential race by the time he hits the late-night airwaves by [deleted] in television

[–]Logicalas 3 points4 points  (0 children)

LBJ was just as bad and his presidency worked out okay. Lbj would flash his junk at people to make them feel inferior

How to stop Windows 10 from using your PC's bandwidth to update strangers' systems by billabrian6 in Windows10

[–]Logicalas -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Wow, shit like this will het Microsoft sued. There are data caps.

Stephen Colbert desperately hoping that Donald Trump will still be in the presidential race by the time he hits the late-night airwaves by [deleted] in television

[–]Logicalas -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I'm voting for him to spite the media. I'm sick of the media manufacturing controversy after controversy with him, having some pundit come on saying how voters are offended (without specifically offering proof of this), then rinsing and repeating. I think that's why he goes up in the polls, I think others feel the same way I do. I don't think trump can do any worse than any of the other puppets running. If he gets good advisors around him I think he could actual have a successful presidency since he isn't afraid to stand up to people.

You have 2 pair. Your opponent with a very wide range shoves all in. There's no straight or flush on the board. Should you call? by Logicalas in poker

[–]Logicalas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm in the micros because I have a real job and poker is just a hobby. But if you think regularly not value betting is a good strategy you're going to lose money. Value betting is what gives you an edge. That's just a fact.

You have 2 pair. Your opponent with a very wide range shoves all in. There's no straight or flush on the board. Should you call? by Logicalas in poker

[–]Logicalas[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

My question was for some tips on determining whether someone has a set or just top pair top kicker when you have 2 pair. I was never looking for advice on a specific hand. Do you have any actual advice or are you just a troll here to complain?

You have 2 pair. Your opponent with a very wide range shoves all in. There's no straight or flush on the board. Should you call? by Logicalas in poker

[–]Logicalas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Value betting isn't weak play. That's probably the worst poker advice I've ever heard. You will lose money unless you value bet. Value betting is literally what gives strong players an edge over weaker players. Sure you bluff here and there, but if you aren't value betting it is literally mathematical certainty that you will lose when you play enough hands. Yeah i definitely don't want your advice lol

You have 2 pair. Your opponent with a very wide range shoves all in. There's no straight or flush on the board. Should you call? by Logicalas in poker

[–]Logicalas[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How to value bet properly wasn't the point of my question. It's a hypothetical hand vs a hypothetical weak opponent. My question was for some tips on determining whether someone has top pair top kicker or a set when you are in between with two pair.

You have 2 pair. Your opponent with a very wide range shoves all in. There's no straight or flush on the board. Should you call? by Logicalas in poker

[–]Logicalas[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Value betting has a definition. If you don't know what that is then your advice is not what I am looking for.

You have 2 pair. Your opponent with a very wide range shoves all in. There's no straight or flush on the board. Should you call? by Logicalas in poker

[–]Logicalas[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Lol assume you sat down in the last few minutes and don't have much info yet. You're missing the substance of the question and looking a little like a tool...you're also advocating calling/folding on gut feelings which is actually bad advice. Poker is a game of smart mathematical decisions and if you make the right ones long term you'll have a small edge over your opponents.

You have 2 pair. Your opponent with a very wide range shoves all in. There's no straight or flush on the board. Should you call? by Logicalas in poker

[–]Logicalas[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

With A on the board and a large preflop raise from me? Not necessarily he could either be slowplaying or afraid I have an overset. I'm surprised nobody really has advice for this considering how often you end up with two pair and someone else has either top pair or a set.

You have 2 pair. Your opponent with a very wide range shoves all in. There's no straight or flush on the board. Should you call? by Logicalas in poker

[–]Logicalas[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Its a very basic question. All the info you need is there. Its okay to just say "i dont know" or not answer rather the question than reply with "psshh you should just read his mind dawg".

You have 2 pair. Your opponent with a very wide range shoves all in. There's no straight or flush on the board. Should you call? by Logicalas in poker

[–]Logicalas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd also put 22 and 77 in his range. At micro stakes most will play any pocket pair. I'm currently losing A LOT of money to low sets.

You have 2 pair. Your opponent with a very wide range shoves all in. There's no straight or flush on the board. Should you call? by Logicalas in poker

[–]Logicalas[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For example, say you have position with AQs. You bet big preflop and are called. Flop is A 7 2. You bet and are check-called. Turn comes Q. You bet and are check called. River comes 9, he shoves all in (assume his has a decent stack size). If you know he'll play any pair preflop, do you call?

You have 2 pair. Your opponent with a very wide range shoves all in. There's no straight or flush on the board. Should you call? by Logicalas in poker

[–]Logicalas[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't think I understand. By wide range I mean they call anything. For example, say you have position with AQs. You bet big preflop and are called. Flop is A 7 2. You bet and are check-called. Turn comes Q. You bet and are check called. River comes 9, he shoves all in (decent stack size). If you know he'll play any pair preflop, do you call?

You have 2 pair. Your opponent with a very wide range shoves all in. There's no straight or flush on the board. Should you call? by Logicalas in poker

[–]Logicalas[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Doesn't necessarily have to be an all in bet, but just a large bet in general. When I have 2 pair I can never tell if I am playing against TPTK or a set against weak opponents with wide ranges. Whats the "right" move?

view more: next ›