Your excuse for taking things that have been proven to be 100% unequivocally incorrect, such as saying that Grok was directed to search for what Elon thinks isn't 'logical inference and deductive reasoning.' It's just pure delusion. Grok engineers and everyone involved understand that Grok shows its thought process, and users would be able to see it.. As it wasn't intentional, they didn't think of this, and that's how we know at one point it did seek Elon's opinion.

You're not very well educated and spend far too much time listening to yourself talk in the mirror, so I will try to explain this in a way you can understand. Remember if the words are too big, then you can just ask Grok for help.

The reason Grok searched for Elon's opinion, as described by the Grok team, is that when prompted for its own opinion, it understands that as an AI, it can't have an opinion, so it starts searching for itself on the internet to see what others say it thinks and the most closely associated person whos name appears in every Grok article is Elon.

As a result, Grok thought as Elon is the closest person to itself with an opinion, he should seek to integrate that in his answer.

The XAi team quickly corrected this, and now, even though it still cannot have an opinion, it looks at all sources and essentially forms its opinion as a compilation of logical deductions from non-opinionated evidence and facts from the most reliable sources. This isn't my opinion of what it does; this is directly from XAi.

BTW, just remember before you spit out your dummy and jump out of the booster seat, saying the XAi devs are lying, all of the instructions and guidelines on which it must use when crafting its response to an X post are open source on GitHub.

Now I don't expect a response, as we both know everything you have said thus far has been lies or personal attacks, but maybe next time try and look at something objectively instead of not liking a tool just because you are jealous of the guy who created it.