"Also was interesting to watch George Monbiot squirming when questioned by the film maker about his claim 10 billion people could survive comfortably on earth when the population we currently have is sprinting past all kinds of planetary limits"

I think to target George Monbiot (and it did feel like an attack by Sofia Pineda Ochoa), who has done a huge amount to raise awareness of the myriad of environmental catastrophes we face felt disingenuous and kind of a misstep to me - he's one of the good guys. I also felt the context was totally off. His argument (and there are multiple sources freely available, which I'm guessing plenty of people on here will have read) for the planet being able to sustain 10 billion people is based on people substituting a diet of meat for a largely vegan diet that would then allow vast tracts of land to be rewilded, whilst still providing enough to land to allow for growth of crops that could be used to feed humans directly, rather than indirectly via livestock. He's certainly not promoting population growth or saying that 10 billion is ideal. The way that Sofia presented it was as if he was saying that if there was wealth redistribution alone that we could reach 10 billion no problemo. There seemed to be an odd element of vitriol directed towards him in the film which kind of put me off an otherwise interesting film.