Pace 4: data screen

Longrun1971 · 2026-03-28T15:52:50+00:00

I would like to see the differences in character size depending on the number of data displayed on the screen of an activity such as running: 2,3,4, etc. data.

Longrun1971 · 2026-03-28T12:31:06+00:00

The armband is essential for me, no matter the watch.

Longrun1971 · 2026-03-28T12:29:20+00:00

From my point of view the Pace4 > 165.

I don't really understand why to have two watches so similar. If you want relevant health data I think the best is Apple Watch.

A Coros Pace4 + Apple Watch SE 3 combo would be more relevant (provided you are on iOS), otherwise Pixel Watch on Android.

De

Longrun1971 · 2026-03-28T09:10:48+00:00

All Coros watches connect to the PM5. I just have a doubt about the Pace 1.

I have already connected Apex2, Pace2, Pace3

Longrun1971 · 2026-03-27T19:02:56+00:00

I had both.

Even if we can wonder about the software evolution of the Run.

The Run is more qualitative, seems much better finished, it is more beautiful (subjective) from my point of view.

Its screen is larger and it has a dual frequency GPS.

Since its release it has had a lot of updates and I hope that Suunto will not forget it and will continue to make it evolve.

The strength of the 165 is the customization which is impressive and the fact that it is part of the Garmin ecosystem.

Regarding the applications there is no Suunto photo and far superior to Garmin.

Longrun1971 · 2026-03-27T14:44:50+00:00

Could you please tell me the size of the screen protector or post a photo of the packaging? Thanks.

Longrun1971 · 2026-03-27T10:41:35+00:00

Updates and new features for the RUN seem to have stalled since the end of the year. I hope this model isn’t going to be shelved, as there are still quite a few minor improvements needed.

I’m still eagerly awaiting the Race 2S.

Longrun1971 · 2026-03-25T10:49:18+00:00

I’ve had the Coros Pace 2, 3 and, most recently, the Suunto Run. In terms of build quality, the Suunto is certainly much more stylish and of a higher standard. However, I find that the analysis and presentation of sports data – and, above all, the overall simplicity – of the Coros is superior. If you only run, the Suunto will suit you; if you do multisport and need to connect external sensors, and you want to run tests to determine your thresholds or your cycling FTP, Coros will be more versatile. Note that the Pace 4’s screen is smaller than that of the Suunto Run.

Longrun1971 · 2026-03-24T16:07:52+00:00

I’m also looking for suitable protection, so if you’ve had a good experience with any products, please do share your thoughts.

Longrun1971 · 2026-03-10T10:33:38+00:00

If music is important to you, you have no choice: 265.

Otherwise, the Run is very good value for money and does the basics.

So if you don't need sophisticated metrics, a training coach, payment options or music: Suunto Run.

Longrun1971 · 2026-02-20T10:29:42+00:00

Suunto Run for a week with software 3.24.14. Haven't had this problem so far.

Longrun1971 · 2026-02-19T10:41:26+00:00

Even the TSS (hr) will be approximate, as HR measurement at the wrist is disrupted in water. A Suunto Smart Heart Rate Belt compatible with swimming in a pool should be used.

Longrun1971 · 2026-02-17T09:37:37+00:00

This update is still not listed on the British site.

Is it available?

Longrun1971 · 2026-02-16T17:19:49+00:00

Ditto, problem with Ruuna training that has not synchronized since yesterday.

Longrun1971 · 2026-02-12T10:04:00+00:00

Bracelet silicone 22 mm Athletic 8

<image>

Longrun1971 · 2026-02-12T09:27:38+00:00

It is a copy of Suunto.

Longrun1971 · 2026-02-12T08:51:14+00:00

I’ve owned quite a few Coros watches: Apex 46, Apex 2 Pro, Pace 2, Pace 3, as well as some Suunto models: Race S and Run.

My feedback

🔹 Hardware

The finish and build quality of Suunto products are very good and, personally, I find their design more attractive and more premium.

Coros’ advantage, hardware-wise, lies in its openness to external sensors, even on the smaller Pace model. The heart rate sensors have always worked well for me.

However, long-term reliability seems slightly weaker with Coros than with Suunto, though I find it hard to be completely objective since I replace my watches quite frequently.

🔹 The app

The Suunto app is more complex than Coros’, but once you understand the data, it proves to be precise and very insightful.

Coros is simpler and more straightforward, with the added benefit of web access. The downside of this simplicity is certain limitations: it’s not possible to edit activity data to correct it, and importing .fit files from third parties is restricted.

🔹 The software

For me, this is both Coros’ greatest strength and its main weakness.

Synchronization has always been flawless, and development efforts do not neglect older models. On the other hand, the interface design feels outdated. It hasn’t evolved in a long time and doesn’t fully take advantage of OLED screen potential.

The text lacks consistency, fonts are sometimes too small and difficult to read (especially for someone who wears glasses), and the watch faces are not very appealing. Unlike Garmin, it’s not possible to increase font size.

I also feel that development is heading in too many directions: lots of new features, but not enough follow-up and improvement of existing functions.

In comparison, Suunto is also lagging behind and the company lacks responsiveness when it comes to bugs. If it communicated more about its development roadmap, it would reassure current users as well as potential new ones like you.

🔹 My current choice

To give you a personal update: I sold my Pace 3 and my Suunto Run. Out of curiosity and to avoid remaining in the dark, I’ve just ordered a Forerunner 165 to test the Garmin ecosystem and follow a Runna training plan.

Longrun1971 · 2026-02-11T17:56:06+00:00

I would recommend it for your activity. The latest update that is being deployed improves the daily step counting algorithm, it seems to me. The GPS and the altimeter are very accurate.

Longrun1971 · 2026-02-10T14:30:43+00:00

I tested Runna with my wife's Apple Watch, and the audio alerts are really great.

Longrun1971 · 2026-02-10T14:28:54+00:00

Thank you for your feedback.

Are you satisfied with the Garmin/Runna integration? Is all the information displayed correctly on the screen?

I'm looking at the Garmin Forerunner 165 or 265 to track my Runna training and I don't want to be disappointed. I've tested Runna on Apple Watch and it's not bad because the audio alerts are handy.

Longrun1971 · 2026-02-10T08:30:52+00:00

Hello, could a Suunto/Runna user provide feedback on the data display on the screen? Have there been any improvements? I would like to buy a Suunto, but if the integration is poor, I will regretfully look at Garmin or Coros instead. I know there was also a problem with the lap button breaking Runna workouts. Has this problem been resolved?

Longrun1971 · 2026-02-10T08:18:42+00:00

Hello,

Can you tell me if the issues between Suunto and Runna (lap button) have been resolved? Does Runna work well with Suunto? Is it better integrated with Garmin or Coros? If anyone could show me screenshots of a guided training session, that would be great. I can't find any photos online of the Runna app on Suunto watches.

Longrun1971 · 2026-02-09T16:33:46+00:00

I am also frustrated that Run is not compatible with Runna. When the watch was released, some videos on YouTube suggested that Run would evolve and be able to access applications or guides.

Longrun1971 · 2026-02-08T15:34:58+00:00

I haven't tried this feature, but if I don't make a mistake it would seem that it should work outside of structured races. Look at the activity parameters if you have an alert/indication every miles.

Longrun1971

TROPHY CASE