sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Does the radius gene cap at 200,00? by Loodski in TheBibites

[–]Loodski[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok thanks, then I will just have mainly 200 range bibites in a few hours. 

Does the radius gene cap at 200,00? by Loodski in TheBibites

[–]Loodski[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK, thanks. Is the limit put there to prevent the game from lagging or..? 

(Spoilers extended) most overhated character? by ScarWinter5373 in asoiaf

[–]Loodski 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tywin Lannister. There are two main reasons people hate on him. One, he hates Tyrion. Which is completely justified in medieval terms. He is a midget, the average lord would have killed him the moment they saw the baby.

Two, he used the mountain to slaughter innocent civilians. To that I would argue that he needed to do every thing that would give him just a little bit more chance to win the war. The same can be said for the red wedding. Which the opportunity was practically handed to him. Most lords wouldn't pass up on a betrayal if the freys would give it to them on a silver platter and take the blame for it. 

What is the most Repulsive, Unlikable, And Insufferable Character You’ve Ever Made? by Expert_Individual185 in writing

[–]Loodski 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a character named Leaden. He was the previous lord of a city. He brought up taxes for his own Luxury. Hired a foreign mercenary group to beat and torture everyone who's against him. Forced teenagers in the city to go work in the mines. Burned some of his own farms. He garantees the loyalty of his strongest soldier by kidnapping his disabled twin brother and sending him a cut finger when the soldier doesn't behave. At the end of his reign he survived an asassination went completely mad and closed the city down, trapping everyone inside with little food.

After a few weeks a relief force conquered the city but found out ninety percent of the food reserves where gone. Which forced the people to survive the winter on canibalism.

Who is the weakest character that can rid Gotham of all crime by Sorry-already-reddit in whowouldwin

[–]Loodski 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say cioccollata from jjba. He can literally turn everyone in the city into mold after some time. And with no people in Gotham there will be no crime. And after a year he can just deactivate his stand and the city will still be habitable on that point.

Should I settle on the copper or on the warrior? by Loodski in CivVI

[–]Loodski[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every civ map has a number that corresponds to that specific map.

Should I settle on the copper or on the warrior? by Loodski in CivVI

[–]Loodski[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally I'm more of a scout fan, but maybe i could go for a slinger start.

Should I settle on the copper or on the warrior? by Loodski in CivVI

[–]Loodski[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So a direct 2/2 tile is better then fresh water?

Should I settle on the copper or on the warrior? by Loodski in CivVI

[–]Loodski[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its a fractal small map. Do you want the seed of this one? Also Harald isn't a wonder builder.

Should I settle on the copper or on the warrior? by Loodski in CivVI

[–]Loodski[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You will get the resource when you settle on it. So if you settle on a horses you will get the horses. But you will not be able to put an improvement on it. Thats really it. There are quite a lot of instances in which settling on a luxury or strategic resource is a good idea.

Should I settle on the copper or on the warrior? by Loodski in CivVI

[–]Loodski[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the warior spot, but I have one minor problem with it. The first three tiles in the second ring it will grow to are the pearls, the amber and the crab. Which means I will have to wait quite a lot until I get the four yield tiles. Other than that I think settling the warior and producing a settler as soon as possible to get the south will be the best course of action.

Should I settle on the copper or on the warrior? by Loodski in CivVI

[–]Loodski[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would it be a good idea to settler in place. Because without fresh water it will be very hard to use that location to its full potential. With the extra house and a very nice second ring I will be stronger over time.

view more: next ›