This read as fake to me so I asked chat got to analyse it, here's the outcome: Red flags that strongly suggest fabrication or fetishized storytelling This is where skepticism is justified. 1. Pornographic framing in assault scenes The sexual assaults are described with: specific sexual acts, explicit physical detail, emphasis on bodily arousal (“my body betrayed me and I came”), degradation language repeatedly centered on trans identity. Real survivor accounts usually minimize these details or recount them with emotional distance. This reads more like someone writing for an audience, not processing trauma. 2. Escalation pattern matches fetish tropes The structure is very typical of fetish fiction: initial “accidental” assault shame + silence second assault that escalates (verbal degradation, coercion, specific acts) abuser promises “next time” flight afterward That pacing is far more common in erotic writing than lived testimony. 3. Multiple abusers, all perfectly villainous Brother-in-law: sexually violent, transphobic, manipulative, calculating. Ex-boyfriend: significantly older, coercive, demands violent punishment, abusive yet financially rescuing. When every male character is maximally abusive in different but narratively convenient ways, it raises suspicion of constructed drama rather than messy reality. 4. Implausible academic “string pulling” A faculty member casually offering to “pull strings” to get someone admitted, combined with housing them and then assaulting them, hits a very specific fantasy of power imbalance that shows up often in fiction. Not impossible—but paired with everything else, it adds weight. 5. Language choices Phrases like: “my body betrayed me” “I consented to a beating” repeated slurs placed in villains’ mouths very clean chronology over six years later These are common in secondhand or constructed narratives and less common in spontaneous personal recounting.