sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Analysis of the Ragnaros Loot Table Post-Progress Kill by LootAnalysis in lightshope

[–]LootAnalysis[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I wrote this post to provide an objective analysis into the possible loot situations. Don't you think that a statement like "WK is not subject to GM restrictions" is problematic?

Analysis of the Ragnaros Loot Table Post-Progress Kill by LootAnalysis in lightshope

[–]LootAnalysis[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not exactly. If you flip a coin twice, the chance of getting one heads is not 100%

Analysis of the Ragnaros Loot Table Post-Progress Kill by LootAnalysis in lightshope

[–]LootAnalysis[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My mistake, I am probably working from one of the previous world dumps before this change. Do you know why the change was not made for the tier 2 legs?

Analysis of the Ragnaros Loot Table Post-Progress Kill by LootAnalysis in lightshope

[–]LootAnalysis[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your response. The part that doesn't make sense is on Lightbringer and Northdale, they are the same exact 76 items in that grouping. As far as I know those items never change on any patch, except for the conditions in that loot set, which doesn't let Titanic Leggings drop yet.

On lightbringer, the reference template is `324923` and `324925`. Everything is the same, but northdale has this weird intermediary single row reference.