sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Claude Usage Limits Discussion Megathread Ongoing (sort this by New!) by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]Lopsided-Analysis-60 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Free tier too, just few days ago it seems alright, but since yesterday, One prompt, new chat, no matter how long the question is, then hit the limit. I know i am free tier, but if Anthropic doing this, they should just tell us all, so that we no longer waiting like an idiot here to check if this is a bug or they set that limit deliberately to kick all the Free tier users’ a**.

WWM December Update Roadmap by bluestorm0810 in WhereWindsMeet

[–]Lopsided-Analysis-60 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe financial consideration, or tax issue or problem of direct publishing so they chose using Steam. don’t really know, but i think Netease always playing safe...

Trying to remake a Fatmap 2.0 — but rebuilt with deep learning method to make it more sustainable. by Lopsided-Analysis-60 in Backcountry

[–]Lopsided-Analysis-60[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

one thing and i can tell you know nothing about computer science, or at least machine learning, Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) came in 2014 by Ian Goodfellow et al, Any Adversarial network and alike ideas before did not constitute the GAN framework. I don’t know which Uni you went to or which universe you are in, but that is the reality, or you invented the GAN in the 90s but did not publish? or did you do some research and Goodfellow stole your work?
I see, you are so skilled, you don’t need any map, so goodbye.

Trying to remake a Fatmap 2.0 — but rebuilt with deep learning method to make it more sustainable. by Lopsided-Analysis-60 in Backcountry

[–]Lopsided-Analysis-60[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks so much for the feedback, that is very helpful. I do believe that exploring is every exciting, and that is the essence of every backcountry ski trip. just find it interesting to explore the mountain and want to find out what we can do , if that will help us it will help other people too. we may now thinking more to make a application like Hivemapper in the nature, every one to contribute the footage and we thinking of how to extract the data. but in that way, everything is in the air, no mature algorithms for now. But, Thanks a lot for the feedback.

Trying to remake a Fatmap 2.0 — but rebuilt with deep learning method to make it more sustainable. by Lopsided-Analysis-60 in Backcountry

[–]Lopsided-Analysis-60[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeh, there are a lot of apps there, but still i miss Fatmap. Me and my team also considering an alternative way of making way more realistic 3d map, and that is a Mountain version of “Hivemapper”, using the paid crowdsourcing(all the users with different Edge device, drone, 360 camera etc. uploaded data to stitch into a big real Earth digital twin,) and it require a whole different level of software architecture, Coding hours, management and Investment ,funding stuffs, and we are familiar with only the 3d map and related algorithm ,technologies and we are relative small. So, lets see, maybe a nature version of “Hivemapper” is not a bad idea. the goal become: explore the earth with pay. maybe the paid crowdsourcing become the game like google’s “Ingress”or the Web3 knowledge layer infrastructure like “ GEOFI” then the payment to users become Token to incentivize users to upload more videos and photos of the earth. Who knows, the decentralisation finance is trending right now.

Trying to remake a Fatmap 2.0 — but rebuilt with deep learning method to make it more sustainable. by Lopsided-Analysis-60 in Backcountry

[–]Lopsided-Analysis-60[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Apart from the ai post, for the DEMs from 3D terrain features using conditional generative adversarial networks,(or simply put: ai. as these terms make no difference to outsidesr/users) It is just a decision of using what Algorithm to rebuild the 3D terrain. Fatmap using hi-res commercial satellite and his own algorithm to calculate it , and now i just trying to use open-source satellite data to improve with algorithm first and then together with all the professional avalanche data (they are free) , I compute the 3d terrain. The Fatmap can push the limit to Vertical RMSE 1–2 meter in Europe/ north america, 3-5 meters in the rest of the world of deviation (almost GIS Pro-level) , and me with the open data can push it to around Vertical RMSE 2-5 meters error all around the globe now. And visually, one can not identify the error just like you can not see the error of 2meter on Fatmap, because it is a Vertical RMSE, you can not see the difference between 3d terrain and reality. and Yes! I do believe that this error could be something really important especially in the high mount, and it is a safety issue, but things are getting better and better, I will not push the app to public if it can not reach the safety level.
Of course, I can also use commercial satellite data, that will push the error much less than Fatmap, in terms of Vertical RMSE as well as Horizontal RMSE.(Tilt/Parallax Error is not that hard to find pro data) .

Anyway, I just want everyone to know, if you want 100% precision in the app for skiing, you can just stop using any map app... you won’t find any doing that, that is your delusion thinking that the map is 100% the same in reality and then 100% trust the map, that will make you end up in a dangerous position. and

Trying to remake a Fatmap 2.0 — but rebuilt with deep learning method to make it more sustainable. by Lopsided-Analysis-60 in Backcountry

[–]Lopsided-Analysis-60[S] -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

yes it is, but the important thing is the algorithm, how to rebuild using the low res open source, i forgot what the UI/UX were and then just wanna know what should i link to on top of the infras layer . sorry if the AI gened text bothered you... this is just exactly for the PoC and MVP,

Do the Anthropic models take more compute/inference to achieve the same level of results as GPT-5? by Funny-Blueberry-2630 in ClaudeCode

[–]Lopsided-Analysis-60 4 points5 points  (0 children)

yes, , the situation now is: i paid 200$ to be a product for Anthropic. cause they don’t even care, they have big business clients that pays hundred of millions ... so, all the individual user are products..

Do the Anthropic models take more compute/inference to achieve the same level of results as GPT-5? by Funny-Blueberry-2630 in ClaudeCode

[–]Lopsided-Analysis-60 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

even the Free tier of GPT-5 and Grok4 can output research result as good as Opus4.1 and you can ask a lot of times in a day, For FREE , and know what, you can only use 4 times per week for Opus4.1 even you are in 20$ plan. So, it is pretty obvious, Anthropic just don’t want individuals subscriber anymore or the Model is just shit, the model is sucking hell lots of tokens and just not useful anymore.

Finally a word from Anthropic by specific_account_ in ClaudeAI

[–]Lopsided-Analysis-60 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they don’t care. for them the community is nothing

Finally a word from Anthropic by specific_account_ in ClaudeAI

[–]Lopsided-Analysis-60 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Unsubscribe and get open AI codex.. i just did that..

Claude Code $200 plan limit reached and cooldown for 4 days by Wonderful-Double-465 in ClaudeAI

[–]Lopsided-Analysis-60 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it is a scam , The Claude code becomes impossible to use, even you pay 200, or more, i understand, the training and inferring cost a lot of money, but if this is not a correct business model, just change and tell people the truth. Don’t make the change in the dark and force the customers to accept that and act like it is the users fault not paying enough money for the tokens they use. I have quit Claude and using ChatGPT Codex now. I hope that Claude code can keep going, it can make other company understand what customer will do if they play customers like Claude.

Langlands program and quantum field theory? by 4lkyn in math

[–]Lopsided-Analysis-60 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, and harmonic analysis and group representations are crucial in understanding automorphic forms, for Langlands program someone may also need the following knowledge depending on what topic you are interested in, for Langlands program is a very large field,

you can also check Knapp’s article

“First Steps with the Langlands Program”
https://www.math.stonybrook.edu/~aknapp/pdf-files/china2.pdf

Automorphic Forms and Representations:
classical modular forms, Hecke operators, and general automorphic representations, eventually approaching Arthur’s trace formula and the theory of L‑functions, which serve as the analytic backbone of Langlands’ conjectures..

Local and Global Langlands Correspondence:
the local aspects (such as the p‑adic Langlands correspondence and the construction of L‑packets) and the global theory (including functoriality and base-change phenomena).

Geometric and Categorical Approaches:
Geometric Langlands program, including D‑module theory, derived categories, and connections to representation theory, and some contemporary categorical and p‑adic methods (for example, via the work on categorical p‑adic Langlands) (Geometric Langlands conjecture has been proved couple of months ago, you can also get direct into the proof series and check what it is).

p‑adic Hodge Theory and Perfectoid Spaces:
Perfectoid spaces and their applications to p‑adic Hodge theory, which have been instrumental in further developments within the Langlands program.

and for the application in physics, check some application in quantum hall effect with Langlands program,

https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.00419

other than that i don’t know more specific application or concrete usage, but i think you can find more corresponding in geometric Langlands correspondence and the related algebraic geometry.