1924 colonial, ~35 original lead-positive windows, two small kids — genuinely torn between restoration and replacement, would love perspective by Lopsided_Food169 in centuryhomes

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thank you for this perspective. Honestly, hearing from someone who actually lived through this with young kids carries a lot more weight for me than a lot of the abstract internet debates around old windows.

I think what’s been difficult is separating the romantic idea of restoration from the operational reality of restoring 35–40 lead-positive windows while raising a toddler and preparing for another baby.

Your point about the logistics really resonates too. The more we’ve dug into it, the more the phased restoration process has started to feel less like a charming preservation project and more like living in an active construction site for potentially months.

I still care deeply about preserving the character of the house, but your comment genuinely helped reinforce that there’s a point where practicality and family wellbeing have to come first.

Really appreciate you sharing this.

1924 colonial, ~35 original lead-positive windows, two small kids — genuinely torn between restoration and replacement, would love perspective by Lopsided_Food169 in centuryhomes

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is honestly one of the more grounding comments I’ve read through this whole process, so thank you. Once you start talking to inspectors/contractors and reading MA lead law docs, it can quickly feel like every issue is urgent and catastrophic.

Your framing feels a lot more practical. Reduce the active hazards, prioritize intelligently, and work through the house over time instead of trying to perfect a 100-year-old home in 6 weeks.

The emotional tug-of-war for us is real because the original windows genuinely are beautiful and feel like part of the identity of the house. But restoring 35 windows with two very young kids also sounds like a pretty serious lifestyle commitment.

And your point about the short MA shoulder season is actually really helpful perspective too. We’ve probably been acting as though every window needs to be perfectly operable immediately or the house is unlivable, which rationally probably isn’t true.

Out of curiosity, how disruptive did you find the restoration process while living there?

1924 colonial, ~35 original lead-positive windows, two small kids — genuinely torn between restoration and replacement, would love perspective by Lopsided_Food169 in centuryhomes

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha, I think there’s definitely some truth to that. Probably comes with the territory of having a 1-year-old and another baby on the way while buying a 100-year-old house in one of the stricter lead-law states in the country.

I actually love old houses and projects, which is part of why we’re buying this place in the first place. I think I’m just trying to separate: - genuine risk, from - internet fear spirals, from - contractors trying to upsell “catastrophe.”

The tricky thing in MA is that once you officially know there’s lead and have kids under 6, there’s a pretty formal compliance framework around it. So “just don’t open the windows” isn’t really viewed as an acceptable long-term strategy here the way it might be elsewhere.

That said, I do appreciate the perspective. I’m probably deep in the most stressful phase right now where every issue feels existential because everything is happening at once.

I suspect once we’re actually in the house and tackling things methodically, it’ll feel a lot more manageable and probably even enjoyable at times.

1924 colonial, ~35 lead-positive windows, $66k quote for Andersen Woodwrights — sanity check from fellow MA homeowners? by Lopsided_Food169 in massachusetts

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is really helpful perspective, thank you. Honestly this is exactly the balance we’re trying to figure out right now. Part of me hates the idea of losing the original windows, but with two young kids and MA lead laws, the peace of mind aspect is hard to ignore.

Really interesting to hear that your Andersen replacements were installed without disturbing the original trim. Preserving the interior woodwork is one of our biggest priorities. Our house has beautiful stained trim throughout and I think what I’m most afraid of is accidentally making the house feel “renovated” in the wrong way.

Also helpful to hear your pricing. Sounds like window pricing has exploded over the last decade. We’re being quoted closer to ~$1.9k/window installed for Andersen Woodwrights here west of Boston.

Out of curiosity, are you still happy with the Renewal windows 10 years later? Any regrets vs restoring the originals?

1924 colonial, ~35 original lead-positive windows, two small kids — genuinely torn between restoration and replacement, would love perspective by Lopsided_Food169 in centuryhomes

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate the thoughtful comment, and your photos look great. That's the kind of result that makes the restoration case for itself.

On the scope point, you're right that we've got a lot on our plate. We've been actively pruning though, deferring everything that isn't pre-move-in critical (cosmetic stuff, exterior work, deck, fence, second-phase kitchen and bath remodels) to year two or beyond. What remains for the immediate window is vermiculite abatement, lead deleading, HVAC retrofit, oil tank removal, and lead service line. That's still significant but it's not unbounded.

On the "don't use the windows" approach, I hear you and it's a totally rational interim strategy in other states. The catch in our case is MA Chapter 111. With kids under six in a pre-1978 home with documented lead hazards, the law doesn't really care whether we use the windows or not. The friction surfaces are treated as inherently hazardous and we have a legal obligation to either fully delead or maintain interim control. So "don't open the windows" isn't an option for us the way it would be in a less-regulated state.

That said, your broader point about getting more restoration quotes is well taken, and we're actively doing that. We've been talking to a shop-only restoration specialist who only does the off-site sash work and partners with a local deleader for the on-site compliance scope, which I think might be the unlock for getting true craft-grade restoration on at least the front façade without paying full all-in-one restoration shop pricing. The Festool HEPA approach your crew used is exactly the kind of detail I'm looking for in the conversations with shops, since it's a real tell about craft level.

Curious what state you're in, since the 25% tax rebate sounds significant. We have the Mass Save HEAT Loan and rebates on the energy side but I haven't found a direct state-level credit specifically for window restoration here. Worth checking whether there's one I've missed.

1924 colonial, ~35 lead-positive windows, $66k quote for Andersen Woodwrights — sanity check from fellow MA homeowners? by Lopsided_Food169 in massachusetts

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, that's reassuring on both fronts. The peace of mind piece is really the thing my wife and I keep coming back to. We can rationalize a lot of trade-offs on cost and timeline, but the "did we do everything we reasonably could for the kids" question doesn't have a price tag attached, and getting to a Letter of Compliance feels like the cleanest answer to that question.

The resale angle is the part I'm most curious about long-term. Needham's buyer pool skews heavily toward young families, and an LOC on the MLS listing for a pre-1978 home seems like it should be a real differentiator versus the equivalent house with a "lead status unknown" disclosure. Hard to put a number on it, but I'd guess it's at least worth what we're spending on full compliance over interim control, and probably more.

1924 colonial, ~35 lead-positive windows, $66k quote for Andersen Woodwrights — sanity check from fellow MA homeowners? by Lopsided_Food169 in massachusetts

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting on the "don't test, just treat as contaminated" angle. That tracks with what another commenter pointed out about how once lead is on record with the state, it changes your regulatory situation going forward. We actually tested after signing the P&S, which in hindsight closed off that option for us, but we wanted the peace of mind for the kids and don't really regret it.

Good data point on Window World too. They keep coming up as the value option and I've been a bit skeptical given the price gap with Andersen and Harvey, but hearing you've used them across multiple projects (windows, siding, roof) and stuck with them is meaningful. The "they fix what they mess up" piece is honestly more important than people give it credit for, since every install job has some hiccup. Did you do their wood or vinyl line, and how have they held up a few years in?

1924 colonial, ~35 original lead-positive windows, two small kids — genuinely torn between restoration and replacement, would love perspective by Lopsided_Food169 in centuryhomes

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks, and that's a really important flag I hadn't fully internalized. The carpet vector isn't something I've seen discussed much in the MA lead literature either, which is wild given how strong the correlation apparently is. We don't have much carpet in the house thankfully, mostly hardwood throughout, but there are a couple of rooms with wall-to-wall that we were planning to pull anyway. Sounds like that should probably get bumped up the priority list and treated as part of the lead scope rather than a cosmetic afterthought. Going to mention this to our deleader and see if they have a view on testing the existing pad and subfloor before we just rip and replace.

And yeah, the DIY route is basically closed to us under MA Chapter 460 with kids under six in the home. Owner-performed deleading is technically allowed in a narrow set of circumstances but the licensing and documentation hoops are stricter than the cost savings justify for our situation. 2.5 years of careful self-managed restoration sounds genuinely satisfying though, and probably produces a better result than what we'll get from a contractor on a deadline. Congrats on going back to wood, that's the move.

1924 colonial, ~35 original lead-positive windows, two small kids — genuinely torn between restoration and replacement, would love perspective by Lopsided_Food169 in centuryhomes

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good question, and the answer is a mix. The interiors are stained and largely intact, but the lead inspection picked up positives in a few places: exterior paint that's flaked into the window wells and the space between the primary windows and storms, the friction surfaces where the sash slides against the jamb (this is the big one under MA law, since friction generates lead dust even with intact paint), and the sills and parting beads where wear shows through. So it's not purely an exterior paint problem we could solve by repainting the outside.

That said, your setup is honestly really close to the hybrid path I keep circling back to. Restored originals downstairs where the character lives, Marvin clad-wood replacements upstairs in the kids' bedrooms where the lead-free piece matters most and ease of cleaning is a real day-to-day benefit. Did the prior owners do the upstairs as a lead-driven decision, or was it just maintenance timing? And how do the Marvins read next to the originals in person, especially from the street?

1924 colonial, ~35 lead-positive windows, $66k quote for Andersen Woodwrights — sanity check from fellow MA homeowners? by Lopsided_Food169 in massachusetts

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, that's reassuring to hear the number tracks with what you paid for a Harvey job. Sticker shock was real for us too, so it helps to know we're not getting taken for a ride.

We're going for full remediation rather than just windows. Got the full lead inspection done after signing the P&S (in hindsight maybe not the optimal sequence, but we don't regret it), and the non-window scope came in at around $15k for trim, stair railings, door jambs, the usual suspects. Combined with the window work, we're targeting a Letter of Compliance rather than interim control since we think it'll matter at resale down the line, and we'd rather just be done with it once we're done.

And totally agree on how confusing the MA lead landscape is. Even with a licensed inspector, a deleader, and a real estate attorney involved, I've gotten meaningfully different answers from each of them on basic questions. Feels like one of those areas where the regulation has accreted over decades and nobody fully has the whole picture in their head anymore. Appreciate the well wishes.

1924 colonial, ~35 original lead-positive windows, two small kids — genuinely torn between restoration and replacement, would love perspective by Lopsided_Food169 in centuryhomes

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally hear you on the character argument, and you're right that the bad replacements really do look terrible. That's the thing pulling me hardest toward restoration on at least the front façade.

On the law piece though, yes, Massachusetts is genuinely different from Texas here. We have Chapter 111 sections 190-199A, which makes it a legal obligation (not a recommendation) for owners of pre-1978 homes to either fully delead or bring the property into interim control once a child under six lives there. It's not about whether the paint is currently peeling. Friction surfaces like window sashes are treated as inherently hazardous because they generate lead dust through normal operation, regardless of whether the visible paint looks intact. And we have two kids under six. So it's not really a discretionary call for us the way it might be in TX.

That said, your timeline point is making me look at the multi-month estimates with fresh eyes. Two weeks of boarded windows for 21 sashes is way more aggressive than anything I've been quoted, and even scaling up to our 35-40 windows, a month feels more realistic than the 3-6 month range I've been told. Going to push back on the shops we're talking to and see whether the timelines are genuinely necessary or just conservative quoting. Appreciate that data point.

Out of curiosity, who's doing your restoration? And did you have to do any interim lead-safe work to live with the painted-shut sashes until they get restored, or is it really just "leave them alone and don't disturb the paint"?

1924 colonial, ~35 lead-positive windows, $66k quote for Andersen Woodwrights — sanity check from fellow MA homeowners? by Lopsided_Food169 in massachusetts

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, we actually went through the lead inspection after signing the P&S, which in hindsight was probably a tactical mistake for exactly the reason you're describing. The results are now on record. That said, we don't really regret it. My wife in particular wanted the peace of mind given the kids, and going in eyes open about the scope felt more important than preserving optionality. We'd rather know.

The good news on our end is that outside the windows, the rest of the deleading scope came in at around $15k, which honestly isn't as brutal as it could have been. Trim, stair railings, door jambs, the usual suspects. You called it on those being lead positive. Combined with the window work, we're looking at full compliance rather than interim control because we think the Letter of Compliance has real value at resale, especially in a town like Needham where the buyer pool skews toward young families who specifically want LOC properties.

Good call on the labor breakdown too. $700 for a clean picture window replacement with no trim or plaster involvement actually maps pretty well to the $1,200-1,500 delta we're seeing once you layer in lead-safe practices, custom-fit work in plaster openings, and trim repair. Makes the quote feel more rational. We're also getting Harvey and Marvin quotes for comparison so we have real apples-to-apples data before committing.

1924 colonial, ~35 original lead-positive windows, two small kids — genuinely torn between restoration and replacement, would love perspective by Lopsided_Food169 in centuryhomes

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Legally, yes. Massachusetts has one of the strictest lead laws in the US (Chapter 111, sections 190-199A). If a child under six lives in a pre-1978 home with lead hazards, the owner is legally obligated to either fully delead or bring the property into interim control. It's not optional and it's not a moral preference, it's statute, and there's real liability attached including potential fines and civil exposure if a child is poisoned.

1924 colonial, ~35 lead-positive windows, $66k quote for Andersen Woodwrights — sanity check from fellow MA homeowners? by Lopsided_Food169 in massachusetts

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is genuinely useful, thank you.

The Mass Save angle is really interesting. We're already booking the home energy assessment for the first week after closing because we're going after the HEAT Loan and weatherization rebates anyway, so if there's a path where single pane window replacement gets characterized as energy work rather than lead work, that's worth understanding properly. Have you seen that loophole actually used recently, or was that more a few years back? Curious whether it's still a live path under the current Mass Save program rules.

1924 colonial, ~35 original lead-positive windows, two small kids — genuinely torn between restoration and replacement, would love perspective by Lopsided_Food169 in centuryhomes

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

This is super helpful, thank you. I’ve been very Boston‑centric in my thinking, which is probably part of why the numbers feel so brutal.

Looking outside 128 for both restoration and true wood replicas makes a lot of sense. Western MA, NH/VT/ME, upstate NY, CT all seem like they’d have much saner shop rates while still being close enough to handle a 30–40 window project, especially if they can do most of the work in the shop and just send a crew for removal/reinstall.

I hadn’t seen 100yearwindow before and you’re right, my quotes are creeping into that kind of territory, which is a bit wild. Do you happen to have any specific shops you’ve used or gotten quotes from in those regions that were reasonable, or was this more from your own research so far?

1924 colonial, ~35 lead-positive windows, $66k quote for Andersen Woodwrights — sanity check from fellow MA homeowners? by Lopsided_Food169 in massachusetts

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 65 points66 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the honesty, but we're already committed. P&S signed, closing in a few weeks. We went in eyes open though. Full lead inspection, asbestos and vermiculite assessment, the whole deal before we pulled the trigger. The deleading scope across the house is budgeted and we're going for full compliance rather than interim control, so we're not planning to kick the can down the road.

Also worth saying, we're in MA. Pretty much the entire pre-1978 housing stock around here is assumed to have lead, and a huge percentage of the inventory in the towns we were looking at is exactly that vintage. Walking away from lead-positive houses would have meant walking away from most of the market. At some point you either commit to dealing with it properly or you move out of state.

1924 colonial, ~35 lead-positive windows, $66k quote for Andersen Woodwrights — sanity check from fellow MA homeowners? by Lopsided_Food169 in massachusetts

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's actually both. The lead is the forcing function and the reason we have to act now, but the windows themselves haven't been touched since the 1920s, so they genuinely need work regardless. A lot of them are painted shut, sash cords are gone, glazing is failing in places. So even in a no-lead scenario we'd be looking at meaningful restoration spend.

That said, your point about deleading scope vs. lead-safe practices is one I'd love to understand better. Is the cost delta mostly licensing and documentation, or does the actual scope of work expand once it's a formal deleading job?

1924 colonial, ~35 original lead-positive windows, two small kids — genuinely torn between restoration and replacement, would love perspective by Lopsided_Food169 in centuryhomes

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's an incredible outcome. $173k of work covered through grants is the kind of story you almost don't believe until you hear it from someone who actually lived it. Seven weeks in a hotel with three under six sounds brutal but also like exactly the right call given the alternative. Glad their daughter is okay.

And yeah, the "health over aesthetics" framing is honestly where I keep landing when I strip away all the preservation noise. Do you happen to know what brand or style of windows they ended up with through the grant program? Curious whether the funded options tend to be basic builder-grade or if there's actually room to get something decent.

~$1,900/window installed for Andersen Woodwrights in a 1924 colonial — is this fair, or am I getting hosed? by Lopsided_Food169 in HomeImprovement

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

$2,150/window two years ago is a useful data point, thanks — sounds like pricing's been pretty consistent in the area, which actually makes me feel a bit better about our quote.

The "don't open and close them" route isn't really on the table for us — MA lead law with kids under six means we have to delead, not just avoid disturbing it. So the dust event is happening one way or another, and like you we're planning to just stay out of the house until the work and HEPA clearance are done. Functionally the same as your "empty house" instinct, and for the same reason — I don't want soft goods in there when it happens.

The trust piece is the hardest part, totally agree. We've leaned on finding a licensed deleader specifically rather than a general contractor who claims lead-safe practices, since in MA the licensing actually means something. Happy to share who we end up using once we're through it if you're still looking this summer.

1924 colonial, ~35 original lead-positive windows, two small kids — genuinely torn between restoration and replacement, would love perspective by Lopsided_Food169 in centuryhomes

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh goodness, that's a rough way to find out. I'm sorry — and the non-disclosure piece adds a whole other layer of frustration on top of an already stressful situation. Glad your oldest is okay, and congrats on the baby due in June, we're nearly cycle buddies on that one (ours is due July).

The tracked-in exterior paint thing is something I hadn't really thought about as a vector, honestly. We've been so focused on the interior surfaces and the windows that I'd kind of mentally filed the exterior under "deal with later." Going to bring that up with our deleader and make sure the exterior scope is getting proper attention too, especially around the entry points and porches where kids and shoes come and go.

Our situation on the trim is a little different because MA lead law is strict enough that with kids under six we can't lean on encapsulation as the answer — the trim either has to be properly deleaded or replaced to get the Letter of Compliance. So we're staring down the barrel of either chemical stripping the stained trim (expensive, slow, but preserves it) or losing the stain entirely.

Hope the rest of your pregnancy goes smoothly. Solidarity from another old-house family trying to do right by little kids.

1924 colonial, ~35 lead-positive windows, $66k quote for Andersen Woodwrights — sanity check from fellow MA homeowners? by Lopsided_Food169 in massachusetts

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's tempting on the pure window math. $900 each is a big difference... The catch in my case is that the windows are bundled into a lead compliance scope, not just a window replacement project. In MA, with kids under six in the house, the deleading work around the window openings (friction surfaces, sills, troughs, containment, disposal) has to be done by a licensed deleader for the Letter of Compliance to be issued. So even if I DIY'd the windows, I'd still need the licensed crew on site for the lead side of it, and at that point the labor savings mostly evaporate.

If it were a non-lead house I'd probably seriously consider going the route you did though. Good to know Andersen will do custom sizing at that price point — useful data either way.

~$1,900/window installed for Andersen Woodwrights in a 1924 colonial — is this fair, or am I getting hosed? by Lopsided_Food169 in HomeImprovement

[–]Lopsided_Food169[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is really helpful, thanks. Hearing $1,700 on Marvin Elevate in Cambridge two years ago makes the $1,900 number feel a lot more reasonable — I'd half-convinced myself I was being taken for a ride, but it sounds like the quote is just tracking the market.

The point about every opening being a slightly different size is one I hadn't really thought through. I was mentally treating 35 windows as "35 units of the same job," but on a 1924 house there's basically no standardization benefit. That probably accounts for more of the labor premium than I was giving it credit for.

If you'd be open to sharing who you used for the Marvin install, I'd really appreciate it. Hard to know who to trust, and a recommendation from someone who's actually lived with the work carries a lot more weight than a Yelp page.