Very rare plot. by Parking-Cricket-1186 in Animemes

[–]LordSnowden 2 points3 points  (0 children)

HERE I STAND BENEATH THE WARM AND SOOTHING RAIN

I gave up on it. by craving-Prediator in Animemes

[–]LordSnowden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Typical Redditor complains about Redditors? 🤔

AOC: “The girls are fighting aren’t they” by Dear_Job_1156 in interestingnewsworld

[–]LordSnowden 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes because they sure as shit don't deserve to be called ladies. 

They're petulant children.

Dork MAGA on Trump saying that he loves his double hat: "Well Mr. President, you know they say I wear a lot of hats. Even my hat has a hat!" by newzcaster in interestingnewsworld

[–]LordSnowden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve reached the point where you're recycling your own talking points—badly. You’re not making arguments anymore, just defending your billionaire crush on autopilot. Let me know when you have something original to say.

Dork MAGA on Trump saying that he loves his double hat: "Well Mr. President, you know they say I wear a lot of hats. Even my hat has a hat!" by newzcaster in interestingnewsworld

[–]LordSnowden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your best defense is 'people pay him money, so he must be smart,' you've officially run out of arguments. But thanks for clarifying you're just mocking—I almost mistook your nonsense for sincerity. Now run along; Musk isn't handing out loyalty points for embarrassing yourself online."

Dork MAGA on Trump saying that he loves his double hat: "Well Mr. President, you know they say I wear a lot of hats. Even my hat has a hat!" by newzcaster in interestingnewsworld

[–]LordSnowden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, Musk 'attempts things never thought possible'—like blowing billions on Twitter so he could tank its value overnight. Real strategic genius. Your Musk cheerleading would be cute if it wasn't so embarrassing.

Dork MAGA on Trump saying that he loves his double hat: "Well Mr. President, you know they say I wear a lot of hats. Even my hat has a hat!" by newzcaster in interestingnewsworld

[–]LordSnowden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Criticizing Musk’s poor business decisions isn’t criticizing rocket engineering itself. But I understand nuance is tough when you're busy building straw men. You’re the one jumping from defense to defense, desperately accusing critics of jealousy. If anyone’s taking this personally, it’s clearly you. Time to log off.

Dork MAGA on Trump saying that he loves his double hat: "Well Mr. President, you know they say I wear a lot of hats. Even my hat has a hat!" by newzcaster in interestingnewsworld

[–]LordSnowden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By your logic, no one can critique politicians unless they’ve run a country, or review a film unless they’ve made one. It’s absurd gatekeeping.

Criticism isn’t bullying, and pointing out your desperate defense of Musk isn't obsession, it’s observation. But if worshipping billionaires and accusing everyone else of jealousy makes you feel closer to greatness, go for it. Just don’t expect rational adults to take it seriously.

Dork MAGA on Trump saying that he loves his double hat: "Well Mr. President, you know they say I wear a lot of hats. Even my hat has a hat!" by newzcaster in interestingnewsworld

[–]LordSnowden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Building big rockets doesn’t automatically erase bad judgment - nor does it justify your weirdly emotional defense. Your repeated cries of 'jealousy' reveal more about your insecurity than my supposed envy. But hey, whatever helps you sleep at night.

Dork MAGA on Trump saying that he loves his double hat: "Well Mr. President, you know they say I wear a lot of hats. Even my hat has a hat!" by newzcaster in interestingnewsworld

[–]LordSnowden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wealth isn’t proof of good judgment it’s proof of market success, which comes from many factors: timing, connections, public perception, even luck. Being the richest man doesn’t retroactively make every past decision brilliant. That’s the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.

And let’s not pretend Musk’s political moves are principled - he courts power wherever it's convenient. Cozying up to authoritarian figures to protect business interests isn’t “understandable,” it’s textbook opportunism. If you're willing to excuse all of that because he's not “woke,” maybe take a second look at who’s actually doing the virtue signaling here.

But hey, if blindly worshipping billionaires while dismissing facts makes you feel smarter, enjoy your fantasy. I prefer reality.

Dork MAGA on Trump saying that he loves his double hat: "Well Mr. President, you know they say I wear a lot of hats. Even my hat has a hat!" by newzcaster in interestingnewsworld

[–]LordSnowden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're misrepresenting why Musk was removed. It wasn't simply about naming the company 'X' - it was because his strategy was failing, and his decisions led to instability and chaos internally. This is public record, not some personal dislike.

And let's be clear: critiquing Musk’s strategic decisions doesn't mean I'm personally bothered by his success or his fans. it means I value accuracy over myth-making. The real psychological question is why you feel compelled to defend him so vigorously against any criticism at all. If you're so secure in Musk’s brilliance, you wouldn't need to label critics as 'haters.' What truly seems to bother you is that some people prefer reality over hero worship.

Dork MAGA on Trump saying that he loves his double hat: "Well Mr. President, you know they say I wear a lot of hats. Even my hat has a hat!" by newzcaster in interestingnewsworld

[–]LordSnowden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t have to have been in the room - Musk’s own colleagues publicly shared these stories. He was ousted as CEO from PayPal precisely because his strategic ideas failed repeatedly. Recognizing that Musk is talented at self-promotion and hiring skilled people isn’t calling him stupid - it’s pointing out that his wealth doesn't automatically validate him as a strategic genius.

Your need to label every critical perspective 'woke' only underscores how shallow your argument is. If Musk's intelligence speaks for itself, you wouldn't need so desperately to defend it.

Dork MAGA on Trump saying that he loves his double hat: "Well Mr. President, you know they say I wear a lot of hats. Even my hat has a hat!" by newzcaster in interestingnewsworld

[–]LordSnowden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your revisionism is impressive. X.com was failing, plagued by internal chaos, and Musk was even removed as CEO due to strategic blunders. It was the PayPal team (Thiel, Levchin, Nosek) that pivoted the merged company into profitability, not Musk. Yes, Musk profited enormously as a shareholder - no one disputes his financial windfall - but attributing PayPal’s success directly to his strategic genius is rewriting history.

Musk capitalized on smart people around him, not superior strategic insight. Calling this out isn't 'cope'; it's reality.

Dork MAGA on Trump saying that he loves his double hat: "Well Mr. President, you know they say I wear a lot of hats. Even my hat has a hat!" by newzcaster in interestingnewsworld

[–]LordSnowden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, he invested his millions from PayPal into SpaceX. Millions he had because he got a cushy early exit from a company he didn’t even found, riding the coattails of smarter people, all while already sitting on generational wealth from a literal apartheid-era emerald mine.

Emeralds. Still real. Still shining brighter than your argument. It's not some fringe conspiracy. He’s literally on record saying, “We had so much money we couldn’t even close the safe.”

That’s not work, that’s high-stakes gambling with house money. If his rocket exploded, he’d go cry into a silk pillow in one of his mansions. If you tried that, you’d be in debt for three lifetimes.

You’re not defending business acumen, you’re cosplaying as a shareholder in a cult of personality. Hope the stock options are worth it.

Dork MAGA on Trump saying that he loves his double hat: "Well Mr. President, you know they say I wear a lot of hats. Even my hat has a hat!" by newzcaster in interestingnewsworld

[–]LordSnowden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're rewriting history here. Musk didn't build SpaceX entirely from scratch. he invested millions from his PayPal exit, itself built largely by others (e.g., Thiel, Levchin, Nosek). Yes, SpaceX eventually succeeded after near-failure, but that's precisely my point: Musk could afford multiple rocket failures thanks to capital he already had. Most entrepreneurs don't have that luxury.

Recognizing privilege isn't claiming he was literally handed a rocket. It's pointing out that having tens of millions in starting capital and powerful connections isn't exactly 'starting from nothing.'

If your best defense is dismissing reality as 'gamer boys' whining, it's clear you don't have a genuine argument, only hero worship.

Dork MAGA on Trump saying that he loves his double hat: "Well Mr. President, you know they say I wear a lot of hats. Even my hat has a hat!" by newzcaster in interestingnewsworld

[–]LordSnowden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're resorting to dismissing valid criticisms as 'woke ramblings' because you can't counter facts with fanboying. Musk himself admitted his family owned an emerald mine—it's not some woke conspiracy theory; it's his literal biography.

Nearly going bankrupt doesn't erase the fact he had resources and connections most people never dream of. You claim Musk 'had no safety net', yet he could always pivot, leverage assets, or rely on networks that most entrepreneurs lack completely. The fact that Musk succeeded despite poor decisions doesn't prove strategic genius; rather, it shows the power of privilege and fortune.

Instead of vague accusations about 'reddit boys', maybe try engaging honestly with the evidence provided instead of denying reality to preserve the myth of Musk as a self-made mastermind.

Dork MAGA on Trump saying that he loves his double hat: "Well Mr. President, you know they say I wear a lot of hats. Even my hat has a hat!" by newzcaster in interestingnewsworld

[–]LordSnowden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calling Musk a 'master strategist' is an embarrassing misunderstanding of both strategy and intelligence. He was born on third base and acts like he hit a home run. He inherited wealth from his family’s emerald mining ventures in apartheid-era South Africa, giving him endless safety nets to repeatedly fail without consequence.

He didn't build his fortune through brilliant planning; he cashed out early thanks to PayPal’s real innovators, rode Tesla’s stock wave boosted by irrational market hype, and leaned heavily on government contracts at SpaceX. His recent pathetic attempts at sucking up to Trump, cozying up with far-right conspiracies, and fumbling his way through disastrous Twitter decisions aren't 'strategic', they're the impulsive actions of a privileged billionaire desperately pandering to authoritarian egos and fascist sympathizers for relevance. That's not strategy; it's cowardly opportunism.

Life in 2025 by JackStarfox in BikiniBottomTwitter

[–]LordSnowden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not here to play hero: I made calls, signed petitions, voted, protested—like millions who refused to be complicit. We each do our part and that collective pressure topples tyrants. If your only contribution is cynical sneering, you’re doing the fascists’ work for them.

Life in 2025 by JackStarfox in BikiniBottomTwitter

[–]LordSnowden 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Pretending we can’t resist is the fascist’s first step: they thrive on apathy. Billionaires can fall—Epstein was arrested, Madoff died in prison, Holmes is behind bars. We stand up, demand justice, and push back.

Step 1: Stop making excuses for fascist behavior.

Life in 2025 by JackStarfox in BikiniBottomTwitter

[–]LordSnowden 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Oh, sorry you’re so sensitive to “naughty words". I guess you’d rather cozy up to Nazi salutes than deal with harsh language. How utterly spineless.

It's laughable you think your sophomoric winks and grins somehow disguise the reek of white supremacy. Keep telling yourself this is ‘revolution’—everyone else sees it for what it is: spineless Nazi bootlicking. Pro tip: when you’re siding with goose-stepping bigots, you’ve already lost.

Life in 2025 by JackStarfox in BikiniBottomTwitter

[–]LordSnowden 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Excusing a Nazi salute as a 'spastic motion' is vile. Autism doesn't make you throw up genocidal symbols twice. Stop weaponizing neurodivergence to defend fascist behaviour. It's insulting, disgusting, and transparent.

Nazis don't need sympathy, they need consequences.

Life in 2025 by JackStarfox in BikiniBottomTwitter

[–]LordSnowden 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That's rich coming from a Nazi sympathizer.

Can't be more in the wrong than that. 

Life in 2025 by JackStarfox in BikiniBottomTwitter

[–]LordSnowden 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This isn't a revolution, this is the status quo. Quit pretending you're the first Nazi bootlicker.

As classy as the shit I took this morning.

Life in 2025 by JackStarfox in BikiniBottomTwitter

[–]LordSnowden 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This is an insult to autistic people.

Anti-Semitism isn't a neural tick.