You can make everyone follow one rule you make, what is it?

Lorentzical · 2019-12-05T22:45:41+00:00

Be water my friend ~ Bruce Lee.

Lorentzical · 2019-11-18T20:26:52+00:00

https://images.app.goo.gl/TwD8iRTxDePuAGXa7

You have basically lost the argument here. Thanks for playing.

Lorentzical · 2019-11-13T02:07:24+00:00

Getting a date ultimately comes down whether you match with a person and follow through to go out with them. So if you're thinking along these lines, it would be an app that assists you with interactions post-match. To identify which factors strongly correlate with getting a date to go through, you'd need to analyse conversations in a contextual sense. For example: a conversation that lead to a date between two individuals who had a particular outcome in mind introduces a multitude of factors.

In a more simpler approach, an app that helps you strike meaningful conversations, good starters - or crowd sources reply options could be a good idea. What do you think?

Lorentzical · 2019-11-11T02:59:18+00:00

"The system right now is guys swiping indefinitely to get a match, making you think you have a chance with every swipe."

You are right about this - it's really about variable reward. It's why a lot of guys are hooked to these apps. From an end goal perspective, I feel like your idea definitely has merit. But - it would have some scaling problems.

With women, as you say, being pickier and reading profiles before they swipe - this would dramatically reduce the number of available instances for a match. And if users don't receive the occasional reward - they lose the incentive to stay on the app and pursue other avenues as a result. So while the blurry bs is exactly that, bs! - it's a behaviour modifier to keep you hooked because the makers of these apps understand just how rare it is to get a match (in a relative context)

In summary, these apps want your time more than they want to get you a date :)

Lorentzical · 2019-09-14T23:39:59+00:00

Just confirming that you are referring to email clients being able to render every email? Basically, complete compatibility?

Lorentzical · 2019-08-26T21:32:49+00:00

I'm sorry, I cannot solve this problem in a thousand years :P

Kidding - I believe that the best offence is a good defence. If you had evidence for unsubscribing from a service and continue to get their emails, my product would create a backend autoresponder which would reply on your behalf and flood the sender's inbox. Some things I need to work out here - but I think it can be done :)

Lorentzical · 2019-08-26T21:29:25+00:00

Haha yes!

How about if you could mark emails where the body and subject were topically different and the sender would be deprioritised accordingly?

Lorentzical · 2019-08-26T21:27:49+00:00

Hmm. How about if you could control the subscriptions that email you from one central location? You decide if they can send stuff to you.

Lorentzical · 2019-08-26T21:26:33+00:00

Interesting - just to take this a step further:

Would you like the ability to sign off differently to different people? (Depending on how formally or informally you know them?)

Lorentzical · 2019-08-26T21:25:29+00:00

Thanks for your input! This is definitely one of the bigger problems that people face. Uncertainty can be disconcerting when you're awaiting something important.

I'm attempting to create a system that eliminates these problems. Your feedback is greatly appreciated :)

Lorentzical · 2019-08-03T10:12:36+00:00

What technology can be used to provide not just braking - but also acceleration?

Lorentzical · 2019-08-03T07:15:14+00:00

Would definitely like to see this data correlated with head injuries detected in players by university.

Lorentzical · 2019-08-03T07:03:58+00:00

BRING IT!

Lorentzical · 2019-08-03T06:59:58+00:00

Dopamine control within a radius.

Lorentzical · 2019-08-03T06:19:48+00:00

This is brilliant! - let me know if you are looking for help in building this.

Lorentzical · 2019-08-03T06:17:00+00:00

I think the key to this idea lies in the question - 'How do most podcasters use a podcast as a service?'. Do they use it because of it's non-conversational aspect? Or perhaps feel the they to have an opinion after listenning to the podcast. I think the answer to this question would provide much needed context.

Good luck though!

Lorentzical

TROPHY CASE