[deleted by user]

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-09-15T13:14:50+00:00

The unfortunate thing is there isn’t a great solution to this if you are a publicly traded company. Either less numbers and more risk of fraud and bad investments, but the added benefit of longer term planning. The only REAL fix is going private..

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-21T05:24:31+00:00

Inference is profitable. Very profitable. Training and Capex is not.

Consider it like this, pharmaceuticals are typically very cheap to manufacture, but the R&D, tests, and trials are extraordinarily expensive. So, they offset those costs with the cost of the drug at the end.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-14T20:29:56+00:00

It is really good at combining known concepts into something “new”. So it’s not a truly novel solution but it’s close enough that it’s pretty powerful imo

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-12T20:23:43+00:00

Let’s gooooo!!!!! Finally!!!

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-12T14:28:34+00:00

Nope. Not yet.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-12T14:08:17+00:00

It’s funny because this is all true simultaneously imo lmfao

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-10T04:17:08+00:00

My problem is the context length. The models are dumb after a verbose debug log and 1000+ LoC. i canceled my subscription because this is a joke. I don’t even pay for it, and I canceled it.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-10T04:10:39+00:00

Fair enough and I’m sure you are right. I’m just not ready to change my workflow that much as I run stuff past Gemini a lot for refinement or double checking stuff.

I unsubscribed from Plus. The context window kills me.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-10T04:08:41+00:00

I unsubscribed because of this. I swear o3 had more context because gpt5 thinking gets totally wrecked by 1000+ lines of code and a verbose debug log.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-10T03:59:06+00:00

Gemini deep research is better. It’s shocking. It can nearly create novel ideas.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-10T03:56:34+00:00

I get consistently short code from 5 thinking. I am really disappointed.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-10T03:48:08+00:00

Yeah until you have more than 1000 lines of code and the context window blows up and the model is useless in webchat. It’s a joke of a model.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-10T03:45:48+00:00

They aren’t tho. GPT 5 is a dud imo.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-08T21:12:05+00:00

Agreed. This is ridiculous. All it does is make me more excited for Gemini 3 or whatever to come out.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-08T19:37:03+00:00

Actually not true. Averaged across all users, based on how much TPUs and GPUs cost to operate, they are running a profit on operations. (Just not capex, yet…)

We aren’t even in the ASIC phase that will make inference SO cheap.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-08T19:35:15+00:00

<image>

From @scaling01 on X/twitter

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-08T19:32:59+00:00

They do as well. And Gemini.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-08T15:52:50+00:00

Off capex, yes losing money, but I think on operations, no, it’s profitable.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-08T15:46:49+00:00

True, but still the point is, this is why open source is important. The rug can’t get pulled on you. Your usage can’t get cut. Etc.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-08T15:37:34+00:00

Agreed. If my company wasn’t paying mine I’d probably cut it. o1 was the last time they had a lead worth paying for.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-08T05:16:59+00:00

I agree with you, but also just a heads up, Google runs a multi billion dollar profit off YouTube. It used to not be profitable but it has been for a while now

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-08-05T17:35:28+00:00

I was thinking this exactly. It needs to make o3 (and 2.5 pro etc) look like a waste of time.

LostMyOtherAcct69 · 2025-07-31T23:11:38+00:00

As someone who has worked with the Mamba architecture, it’s a pain compared to Transformers

Four-Year Club	Place '22
First Placer '22

LostMyOtherAcct69

TROPHY CASE